Writers Taking Risks - Assignment Example

taking risks Introduction To be a means taking risks, putting yourself and your concepts out there. Additionally, to be a writer means being vulnerable to criticism or even a subject of ridicule. If a writer has strong views on any subject, he or she is rest assured that some shade will be thrown their way, no matter how cautiously they present their evidence (White 65). O’Reilly in his book Kennedy’s last days has depicted well the risks he took and the responses he received. Summary of the source ‘Kennedy’s last days’ is about the exhilarating account of the horrific assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy. The book is for age 10 and over. OReilly chronicles a valuable, historical narrative of the tragedy that changed the nation. He presents information on the shocking events that lead to John Kennedy’s assassination that changed the course of American history. He also presents the political crisis the President was facing, his life and his family in the eye of the public. He recounts the gripping detail and brutal murder of John Kennedy, and how a sequence of gunshots killed a president that people loved. He also recounts how JKF sent the nation into the catastrophic division of the war in Vietnam. He also sent the nation to the culture changing repercussion of the Vietnam War. On the other hand, OReilly describes Lee Harvey Oswald as an angry Drifter, taken into police custody. His accusers accused him of the most notorious twentieth-century crime. OReilly also highlights the President as a brave leader, a hero, and a president whose desire was to make the world a better to live. Nonetheless, O’Reilly presents the government’s line that Harvey Oswald was a lone nut. However, Bill O’ Reilly book for young readers, Kennedy’s last Days about the JKF assassination might have remained inoffensively out of pasture had its author not been accused of fabricating a part of its monolog. Other writers and advocates have for a long time cataloged the meltdowns, exaggerations and many stumbles of OReilly. They perceive OReilly as being risky, recurrently unfair and inexorably lopsided. In the final pages of the book, he describes how he tracked down a shadowy Lee Harvey Oswalds associate in Florida. George de Mohrenschildt, the Russian-American businessman, had known Marina, Oswalds wife. He also helped Oswald get his first job. O Reilly in his book wrote that he heard a blast of a shotgun only to discover George had killed himself. However, news outlets are now challenging OReillys narrative with reports that he was in Texas at the time of the businessperson’s suicide. Moreover, a former anchor at WFAA-TV, Byron Harris said that OReilly stole that article out of the newspaper. He goes on to state that Channel 8 did not send him to Florida to do that story since it was a story of the newspaper that was broken by the Dallas Morning News. Critique His obsession so shades the authors reality perception with image and reputation. His whole view of the world is so theatrical that one almost cannot fault him for confusing stories that are bad and those that are true. OReilly is more of an entertainer. His book delightedly pursues nearness at the cost of taste (Waldman 5-7). Some of the stage effects are offensive. He introduces the death of Joe Kennedy, JKFs brother in the most sensitive manner. He introduces Joes plane crash tragedy in a manner that is practiced and clever. Conversely, his description of JKFs assassination on a single page is sensational. On the page, he describes the assassination of JKF in a manner that is gruesome leaving his readers with horrific images in mind. For instance, he describes how the first ladys face and clothes were showered with blood, brain, and bone fragments. Additionally, the author has the tendency for blurring the details of history without exactly fabricating them. He makes the stories fit his all-encompassing design. For instance, he says that Oswald was unhappy he did not attract widespread attention yet he wanted the media to notice him as well as appreciate him. However, there is some evidence that disputes these allegations. Oswalds return from the Soviet Union to the US in the year 1962 month of June generated some coverage in the newspaper in Texas. Nonetheless, he had anticipated for more attention than he had gotten since he loved attention. In fact, George, De Mohrenschildt described him as an actor in his own lifes stories. The idea that Oswald felt to show on earth for his time is more imagined than documented. The writing in his book attempts to conceal his biases that list towards historys great many theories about the fate, good and evil. According to OReilly, Kennedy is a hero and performer who is admired and beloved. Oswald, on the other hand, according to OReilly is envious whos come back from the Soviet Union in the United States does not attract widespread attention of the media. One can feel OReillys most cruel insult he can hurl at Oswald yet reach for both the highest compliment he can offer John Kennedy. Further, he refers to Kennedy as great while to him Oswald is small. OReilly wants his readers to admire the knack for self-mythology of the president and his capability to initiate change by presenting an inspirational face to the world. In relation to the context above, O’Reilly has attempted to be as risky as he can get. The factors that determine how risky a writer can be is when the writer exposes issues that might spark controversy. Additionally, they may be issues that can be pushed aside because they might be inconvenient. A writer gets risky by exploring the themes taken with refreshed eyes. The writers let reality shine by itself as they show character and events. They take risks to something with honesty, digging deeper into subjects that others may fear to delve into. Some readers usually appreciate this honesty (Bocco 3). However, some of the readers will despise the writing, dread it or even feel uncomfortable about the subject. For instance, O’Reilly has stuck to risk writing, focusing mostly on political content. His writing has not gone well with some of his readers who have accused him of being biased. For instance, his depiction of Harvey Oswald as a villain, who lacked class, was desperate for media attention and was envious of John Kennedy, is the portrayal of risk in his text. Nonetheless, OReilly has attempted to manage the risk by trying to criticize John Kennedy slightly that the readers do not agree to. He implies that his morals are up for grabs or only available on his eyeballs. Conclusion While it is true that no writer can make everyone pleased, concept diversity and tastes are what matters. Writers can nevertheless benefit from attempting to persuade openly through reasoned argument. Work Cited Bocco, Diana. Write Attitude. New York: Imbolc Books. 2014. Print Waldman, Katy. A Close Read of Bill O’Reilly’s “Nonfiction” Children’s Book. 2015. White, Fred. The Daily Writer: 365 Meditations To Cultivate A productive And Meaningful Writing Life. Canada: F + W Publications, 2008. Print.   Read More