God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything - Essay Example

Download file to see previous pages Therefore, the writing qualifies to be risky because like in other similar writings, Hitchens uses derogatory facts, and logical arguments to support the statements. On that note, his book is riskier than others because it breaks established norms and values considered sacred by society. Additionally, the writer understands the consequences of doubting God hence uses various fallacies and ideologies to prove the textual validity of his book. In other words, what determines how risky a writer could be is his audience’s background and culture. There are also social expectations that do not want to question conventional cultures and customs hence making the work of a writer both risky and controversial (Hitchens 87).
Therefore, the risks that interest me in the text include the questioning of the Old Testament in terms of its influence over the masses. There is also the element of how religion kills the inherent pleasure that people harbor in the context of intolerance and violence. In other words, Hitchens purports that issue of God has been used to deceive people to postpone their happiness and pleasure instead of focusing on other issues.
There are also the risks of generating wild debate in the arena of religious doubts especially in the context of logical arguments. Hitchens presents his ideas to oppose the usually held beliefs in the context of communal conformity and conventions. Therefore, the fundamental risk involves the rejection by friends and family members especially for holding an opposing view in the national perspective. Additionally, there is also the use of biblical stories that are questionable in view of scientific experiments and verification (Hitchens 75). On that note, there is urgency to comprehend the weight of risk for a writer in this context is totally unavoidable. This is because the author uses ridicule and mockery of God to further his atheist ideologies without a positive motive. Similarly, it is also paramount to inculcate the use of religious examples to distort the known facts of life and religion especially supplication God (Hitchens 136). Alternatively, in Hitchen’s book, the title is strangely conspicuous with an alarming title that is meant to arouse curiosity than the content therein. In other words, the author intends to create the impression of an ideologue taking the untraveled path of discrediting religion. This also applies to the use of strong terms in the context of intellectual presentations and analysis. Therefore, another fundamental issue that makes a writer’s works both dangerous risky involves the use of persuasive language to brainwash and reform. This begins with a change in the mindset of the audience though conventional help perceptions such as the belief in God and other inherent religious affiliations. On the other hand, it is also permeates to the broader spectrums of the audience without the intellectual ability to evaluate and make rational judgment of the book’s risky contents. It also leads to people forming a biased and prejudiced opinion of the understanding a controversial text such as ‘God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything by Christopher Hitchens. Therefore, it is essential for the reader or audience to acknowledge that creative people take such risks while guarded by an intellectual gusto to challenge the establishment (Hitchens 102). This is most reflected in the angry reactions from most audiences in the refusal to read the book because its anti-God stance. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More