Download file to see previous pages...
On the other hand, voluntary euthanasia is one which includes the consent of the patient while involuntary euthanasia does not include the consent of the patients because they are not in a position to make any credible decision (Kon 459). Lastly, involuntary euthanasia occurs when a person requests not to be killed only to end up being killed. This paper will give reasons why it’s immoral for the physicians to assist in suicide.
According to the constitution of United States, every citizen has the right to live. The constitution also states clearly that there is no one who has the right to take the life of the other. As a result, it’s illegal and unethical for any person to decide if the other person will live or not. With the increasing stress levels in the world, making such a move to be legal will lead to increased cases of euthanasia (Pereira 1075). Many physicians will be faced with many cases of voluntary euthanasia. It’s immoral for any physicians to help either in voluntary and involuntary euthanasia. Research indicates that when patients are in very intense pain, they are likely to take actions that are regrettable. As a result, voluntary euthanasia is an unethical way of giving a person who is not of sound mind an opportunity to make a critical decision about his existence.
Allowing physician assisted suicide will increase cases of negligence in our hospitals. Currently, the number of negligence cases in the health facilities has increased tremendously. As a result, when physicians are given the ability to terminate the lives of patients suffering from painful and terminal diseases, they will not put any effort to prolong the lives of these people. Instead, they will just be administering lethal drugs to such patients in order to end their lives. Therefore, they will get an escape route, an aspect that will reduce their levels
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
This first section focuses on public opinion on euthanasia. There is little question that euthanasia is a complicated issue. For the purpose of this paper euthanasia will refer to any activity that is enacted to enable a more rapid ending of a life that relieves pain and suffering of a patient.
Many epidemic diseases are under control and with the life saving drugs around, many excruciating illness have been eradicated. Apart from all these advancements, there are few issues which need to be discussed and need a crucial decision when it comes on choosing death by himself/herself or by a family for a terminally ill patient.
The issues that are challenged are beneficence, maleficence, autonomy, and justice. For instance, I will be using Terri Schiavo’s case (coma from 1990 – 2005 March) as an example because it is relevant to this critical discussion. I would apply the aforementioned ethical principles to the case and discuss if Euthanasia is ethical or unethical.
The author states that the euthanasia debate contains impassioned and compelling arguments on both sides of the discussion. Advocates of euthanasia want to diminish needless suffering. Numerous diseases such as cancer are responsible for causing patients to linger while experiencing an excruciatingly painful existence.
By definition, Euthanasia is the practice of deliberately ending life in order to relieve suffering and pain of a human being. It can either be voluntary or non-voluntary. Some argue that euthanasia is good death or when a physician decides to provide assistant to the patient by providing medication to gently end his life.
They include assisted suicide, active voluntary euthanasia and physician-aided suicide. In essence, these terms describe the ending of one’s suffering via termination of their life often via drugs administration. Today, Patients Rights Council (2012) reveals that assisted suicide is considered illegal in 47 U.S States apart from Washington, Montana and Oregon which support physician-assisted suicide.
Voluntary euthanasia is the process of ending the patient’s life to end pain and suffering but such a decision is made by the patient. Involuntary euthanasia involves performing euthanasia on a patient, who is able to provide informed
ocesses include: identification of the dilemma, the potential issues involved, the relevant ethical codes, applicable laws and regulations, consultation on the dilemma, courses of action and the consequences of decisions made among others. The two that matter the most among all
If the patient cannot take such a decision because of his/her physical condition, the choice can be made by his/her relatives. The question of permitting or prohibiting euthanasia is associated with constant and
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Euthanasia should be illegal for FREE!