StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices in the US - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices in the US" states that the disagreement explains why the justices need to change and respond to the new environment. However, the federal judiciary shall remain independent to ensure that fairness and justice prevail…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.1% of users find it useful
Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices in the US
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices in the US"

There was a belief that justices will never change the course of their tenures. The conventional view faced many challenges and implications. Professor Strauss has a view that Justices don’t reverse their beliefs with time to adjust to the dynamic legal environment. It was assumed that there was a lack of change in ideologies among the Justices. This conventional view is a result of empirical observation and intuition. One of the main challenges is the study done on the voting of justices. In civil liberties, writers reached a conclusion that the rulings of seven Justices (Burton, Burger, Harlan, Brennan, Jackson, Stewart and Marshall) remained unchanged over the period of their careers. The others, however, changed in significant ways. There was a great need to resolve the debate that had come up. There was a need to reconsider the appointment of justices. In trend to the left, we consider Justice Blackmun, who was among the twelve Justices. He said that when Justices go on Supreme Court their constitutional philosophies are not fully developed. Douglas and Harlan moved to the right and later changed to the left. When appointing a justice, we should ensure that we share the same ideologies with him.

Ideological values and votes of US Supreme Court justices

Supreme court justices are assumed to have strong dependent votes basing on their personal policies and values. Herman Pritchett’s The Roosevelt Court (1948) examines dissents and voting blocks of Justices. The court allows Justices to be dependent because there is no electoral accountability and the idea that the Supreme Court gives the last and final ruling. Justices are believed to be granted independent powers so that their rulings and not influenced by other parties. Their rulings hence are considered fair and just. Perceived values are not regarded as perfect ideologies of Supreme Court justices. The dependence granted to justices, therefore, renders their voting behavior unpredictable. There is a high correlation between the justices’ votes in civil society and their ideological values.

 

Separation of powers in the positive theory of congress and courts.

            Here we consider how powers are separated in courts. We shall consider the attitudinal model and the model of separation of powers. In an attitudinal model, judges make rulings basing on the facts of the cases and not their ideologies and values. In the model of separation of powers, Brian Marks, one of the first scholars says that the status quo come first. After the status quo, the courts react. Congress can adopt or refuse the committee’s proposal without any amendment. The court is assumed to have perfect and complete information i.e. justices have complete and perfect information concerning the congress. Enforced statutory interpretation and one-dimensional issues are also assumed. There are also assumptions about the congress like costless legislation/salience and limited veto points (Saul and Brenner,  55-649). There are several assumptions concerning congress/court interactions like last licks, exogenous judicial preferences. The legislative process can be divided into three models: the multiple veto model, the party caucus model and the committee gatekeeping model. We also have further tests which include the inferential measures of attitudes and median voters. Considering the Supreme Court in the U.S, the theoretical and empirical results pose doubts on the issue of the voting of justices. If we base on the multiple vetoes, then the courts are considered rational in voting. Observations have shown that justices are not dynamic when it comes to adjusting to the ever-changing political environment.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Summary Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 156”, n.d.)
Summary Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 156. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1671710-summary
(Summary Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 156)
Summary Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 156. https://studentshare.org/english/1671710-summary.
“Summary Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 156”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/english/1671710-summary.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices in the US

American Supreme Court

rg and select two supreme court justices.... Turning to the issue of diversity, supreme court justices must be cognizant of how their judgments affect all Americans.... Who are the people on the supreme court?... hellip; Part A Established in article III of the United States Constitution, The supreme court comprises of nine justices (the chief justice and eight other associate judges) whose are all presidential appointees under the censorship of the senate....
56 Pages (14000 words) Essay

Important Court Cases - 20th century american history

The supreme court agreed with them 9-0.... He refused to accept the ruling by the supreme court of the United States.... History tells us about the things we should never forget.... Few can dispute the historical role played by this case which almost certainly is the most famous American court case of the 20th century.... A book by Myrdal showed the court that the state of black schools was inferior (Myrdal 1944)....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

The Bill of Rights is Necessary Today

Obviously, the right to own arms was of supreme importance to the Founders given that it was listed second only after the freedom of religion and speech was documented in the First Amendment.... These four Amendments are invoked regularly today, argued, and debated in and out of court....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

The Bill of Rights Importance in the Justice System

Though not explicitly written into the Constitution, this presumption has been interpreted by several court rulings as implied in the Eighth and Fifth Amendments.... This right and others are outlined in four Amendments, the Fourth which protects against searches and seizures without benefit of a court warrant, in addition to the Fifth, Sixth and Eighth....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

The Supreme Court vs the Federal Government

Chief Justice Rehnquist admitted that supreme court justices “go home at night and read the newspaper or watch the evening news on television; they talk to their family and friends about the current events” and, consequently, cannot “escape being influenced by public opinion” (Baum & Devins).... (Assignment) The supreme court Vs the Federal Government In America, as Baum and Devins argue, the supreme court heeds more attention to the politicians, academics, and elites of the community than they do to the public opinion....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Justice Scalia's Supreme Court Rulings

Scalia believes various constitutional changes to the us laws should be interpreted with respect to their essence at the period of amendment.... Insert name Tutor Course Date Is Justice Scalia wise enough in his supreme court rulings?... Since 1986, Justice Antonin Scalia has delivered different rulings on various high profile cases in the United States supreme court.... This paper explores the philosophies of Justice Scalia as evident in some of the supreme court rulings he has made on discrimination and criminal procedure....
9 Pages (2250 words) Research Paper

Current Supreme Court Cases

Fernandez v California: supreme court of the United States Blog (SCOTUS-blog) 2015, Web, 25 Jun.... justices Alito, Ginsburg, Kagan, Sotomayors and the Chief Justice were against were against any motions filed with Randolph case as the basis hence agreed with the final decision(Russell 1).... However, Fernandez has four votes from justices Breyer, Kennedy, Scalia and Karlin who supported the Randolph summary judgment with the argument that the police officers went against the law by first taking into custody the objecting party and coming back to obtain consent of other co-tenant....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

The Selection and Description of Supreme Court Justices

The paper 'The Selection and Description of supreme court justices' presents the US Supreme Court Justice System which is on par in terms of power and influence as the President and the Senate.... The first nine supreme court justices were named in 1789, but it was not until 1816 that the Senate authorized the formation of the Committee on the Judiciary for the explicit purpose of considering and confirming (or rejecting) the nomination of an associate or chief justice for the Supreme Court....
10 Pages (2500 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us