Download file to see previous pages...
Mark Harper, the Minister for Constitutional and Political Reform in 2010 stated that offenders who are sentenced less than four years will possess right to vote in United Kingdom. These prisoners can take active participation in European Parliament Elections. However if the judge considers this kind of participation to be inappropriate then it can be eradicated while making the sentence. In overall context though there has been new laws implemented regarding voting rights of prisoners but it still needs to be incorporated throughout the system (Rozenberg, 2011). There are judicial officials who state that such form of rights initiate leniency in custodial sentence of a prisoner. On the contrary, the term democracy indicates that every individual shall be given their fundamental rights. Right to vote is one of the basic human rights which cannot be differentiated in context of an individual or a prisoner. From 1870, law was formed that restricted a prisoner from participating in European Parliament Elections. Successive governments in United Kingdom has sustained the particular position in relation to an individual breaking societal contract followed by imprisonment, will not be considered eligible for voting in any elections. This is a logical perspective as giving equal rights to prisoners will create more chaos in a region. However living in a democracy means every individual possess basic right, irrespective of their colour, creed, race, ethnicity, etc. The justifications given by politicians or judicial authority can be contradicted by stating that an individual involved in electoral fraud can be given a sentence by court (Easton, 2009). This sentence can indicate removal of voting rights for a fixed time period. Politicians being indulged in the procedure results into irrational moves. They are not focused on crime committed by prisoners while eradicating their right to vote but politicians are more inclined towards
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
In the United States for example, ‘non-citizens’ have not been accorded the right to vote. As a result, there have been campaigns and calls for extending voting rights to ‘non-citizens’ in the United States. This paper seeks to refute the calls for ‘non-citizens’ voting rights in the United States elections.
These young people were also called the Bright Young Things. 2 Part of that era's more pleasant face was the introduction of the car assembly line which mass production was perfected by Henry Ford with the Model T in 1908. All this social change involved the poor more than the rich but all were aware of a glittering new world of style and money, fashions and music.
In the past companies believed that the most important strategy is to win market share through product oriented mass-marketing; profitability and revenue would be generated; one hopes; by themselves through economies of scale. However in the 80's the increased competition in global markets and the declining turnovers of companies that relied solely on product oriented mass marketing prompted companies to consider how they could ensure business success in the long term by improving customer relationships and increase their orientation towards customer's needs.
The Forfeiture Act of 1870 denied offenders rights of citizenship and prisoners have been disenfranchised in accordance with the notion of civic death. Social exclusion serves to indicate to prisoners that, at least for the duration of their sentence, they are dead to society. However, disenfranchisement has not proved to be much of a deterrent. There is no evidence to suggest that criminals are deterred from offending behavior by the threat of losing the right to vote.
This is not to say that the rest of society look down on convicts (though is the case in some individual circumstances) but view them as a separate entity from themselves and the rest of the community and as a result subconsciously alienate this group of
Since prisoners are still citizens, they ought to enjoy the right to vote.
No, the political opinions of prisoners are as important as for ordinary citizens. The government does not grant the right to vote as it does other rights. This means the
But, it does not seem right to blow up any chances of steering a felon to the right path by not allowing him/her to vote. This is an established fact now that the UK’s ban on prisoners’ voting is a direct breach of
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Should Prisoners Be allowed To Vote for FREE!