Analysis of Sicko by Michael Moore - Movie Review Example

Sicko Analysis Introduction The movie d Sicko produced by Michael Moore in 2007 is one of the documentaries that serve to reveal the scandals in the American Health insurance systems. For many years, the American government has been striving to ensure that its citizens have access to quality health care by ensuring that each of them is insured. However, Moore reveals that this farfetched dream of offering each American a health insurance is yet to be achieved. Moreover, Moore reveals that even the percentage of the Americans that are insured do not have the confidence that they will receive health care when needed because of the numerous scandals and frauds surrounding the insurance systems. The movie drew numerous reactions from Americans. For some Americans, the movie exposed what has been happening in the health care system denying the Americans the level of health care they deserve. For others, the movie is, but an exaggeration of the existing drawbacks in the health care system. A close analysis of the movie reveals that Moore addresses critical issues that need attention if the health care system is to be improved. This paper will highlight how Moore successfully exposes the frauds and the scandals in the health care system. A documentary that seeks to make a revelation of an existing failed system should present facts and accurate statistics. It is wrong to make false accusations that lack evidence of proving the claims. This is what is expected in Moore’s film. For it to qualify as a successful documentary, it is critical to analyze whether Moore uses facts and provides evidence for all the claims that he makes. In addition, the claims made by a documentary should be compelling and strong enough to influence policymaking. This is the reason why producers should look for substantial evidence that can influence policy making in the end. The purpose of the documentary should remain evident and the producer should stay from propaganda. The integration of the producer’s opinion with voices from people considered as an authority in a specific field serves to validate the claims made in the film (Moore). Moore’s film can be analyzed based on these criteria in an effort to ascertain that he succeeds in making a documentary that exposes the failure of the health care systems. Evidently, Michael Moore presents facts in his film. He uses statistics to explain the percentage of Americans who lack insurance. He also highlights that over 45 million Americans have insurance covers that prove inadequate when they need medical care urgently. These are the realities evident from the American health care system. The evidence presents the percentage of Americans who lack any form of health insurance. However, Moore chooses to focus on the suffering of Americans who have health insurance covers, but are barred from accessing health care. Prior to making his film, Moore was involved in a rigorous research that sought to identify some of the setbacks in the health care insurance systems. He invited the public to relate their ordeals in the insurance system during the critical times when they sought health care. Therefore, Moore was in a position to obtain a diverse range of facts from Americans and their concerns about the health care insurance system. In order to make his evidence compelling, Moore incorporated specific stories of Americans who had suffered and lacked health care despite the fact that they had health insurance. Without doubt, the numerous stories, which reveal the grievances of the Americans and their disappointments with the health insurance system, make Moore’s claims valid (Moore). It is without debate that the health care system exhibits a form of dysfunction, especially when it comes to insurance cover. The fact that Moore incorporated interviews with health care providers served to introduce a different dimension of his claims. Evidently, he did not rely on the one sided story of the Americans who presented their complaints. He needed to find out the opinion of doctors and other health care providers in an effort to inform the public on whether health care providers believed there was an existing problem. He proved successful in obtaining information from the health care providers. In his film, he highlights that some doctors admitted to denying claims to the advantage of the company while Americans suffered. Moreover, he interviewed former workers in the insurance companies who revealed the scandals that are developed to limit coverage. These scandals are developed in an effort to ensure profits to the company. Michael Moore made trips to Canada, England, and France with the purpose of analyzing health care delivery systems in those countries. He hoped to compare the functioning of health care systems in those countries with the American health care system. He reveals that the three countries he visited presented a more organized health care system that considered the health of its citizens as a priority. He highlights that citizens with health insurance covers in those countries were not exposed to similar disappointment as the case in America. Although Moore succeeds in presenting evidence that there is a salient need for reforms in the American health care system, he makes certain assumptions in the film. His entire film focuses on the flaws of the American system, ignoring some of its positive attributes. Worth noting is the fact that the quality of health care in the United States is remarkably high considering recent advancements brought about by successful medical research. In addition, Moore failed to highlight flaws in the health care delivery systems of countries such as Canada, England, and France. These omissions made by Moore served to compromise the validity of his claims (Moore). Conclusion As described above, the Michael Moore film title attracted numerous reactions from the Americans. The film succeeded in highlighting the flaws in the American health care system. Moore’s claims are backed up by clear evidence from some Americans who have suffered in the health care system, opinion of health care providers, and revelations from former staff in the insurance industry. In addition, he offers a comparison of the American health care systems with that of other established economies. These aspects make his argument compelling. However, the omissions described above serve as negative aspects of the film. Work Cited Moore, Michael, dir. Sicko. New York, N.Y.: Weinstein Co. Home Entertainment : Distributed by Genius Products, LLC, 2007. Film. Read More