The Authors Thesis - Essay Example

• Moreover, this thesis looks more like a fact that cannot be argued. Yes, new power sources for cars appear, such as electric batteries and hydrogen fuel cells. But no one can argue that this statement won’t cause a debate. The author could have restated the thesis and made it more debatable. For instance, “the appearance of these new power sources in the auto industry generates several questions concerning safety, effectiveness, and convenience of their usage”. And then the author would continue his/her essay, describing the pros and cons of these new sources. In this, say some good justifications using electric engines and hydrogen fuel cells might be inconvenient and even dangerous.

How does the author address counterarguments? Are they present? Are the counterarguments "real" or are they supposed? Who is making the counterarguments?

• The author’s counterarguments are the disadvantages of new power sources for cars. Throughout the author’s main point is that gas energy won’t be used shortly, because it is expensive and pollutes nature. He/she argues that electric engines and hydrogen fuel cells are better choices. There are some counterarguments, but they are scattered throughout the essay. The author claims, that despite the benefits of new sources, some problems may arise. With electric cars, the problem is, firstly, the exorbitant price, and secondly, the need to charge it all the time. In the case of hydrogen fuel cells, the gallons might be explosive, so there is a need for a proper tool to fuel a car. The counterarguments are real – they are stated facts.

What sort of argument is the author making, based on the argument types?

• According to Joining Academic Conversations, there are several types of arguments: arguments from the heart, arguments based on value, facts, and reason, on raster, proposals, stylish and humorous arguments.

In this very essay, the arguments made by the author are based on facts and reason.

On the whole, I would say that his essay does not deserve the highest mark. It does not meet the standards of MLA format. Moreover, the thesis needs some revision, because it is simply restating a fact. And I would change the structure, putting all the arguments first, and the counterargument after them.