CRITIQUE OF QUANLATATIVE ARTICLE - Essay Example

The authors convincingly states that culture and financial capacity were hindrances to the divergence in the delivery of healthcare services to the Hispanics and immigrants. The authors insist that focusing on the removal of the two hindrances should be prioritized (Im, Guevara & Chee, 2007). Further, the authors use secondary resources to back up the hypothesis. The secondary sources include the 2002 Andersen et al. findings that Hispanic patients had to endure more pain and lesser quality of life healthcare services compared to the white Americans and the African Americans.

The authors use another secondary source, Cleeland et. al., showing the language barrier prevents the vivid transfer of healthcare information between the healthcare provider and the Hispanic cancer patients. The misinformation between the Hispanic patients and the English-speaking White and African Americans created a vague picture of the patient’s true medical condition. The miscommunication precipitated to medical professionals prescribing less effective medicines or medical procedures (Im, Guevara & Chee, 2007).

Critique of the methodological congruence of your article. Substantiating the research view, the authors’ research methodology is to conduct an online forum with 15 Hispanic patients (Im, Guevara & Chee, 2007). The authors used secondary resources to back up the thesis statement. The authors sought to find out the Hispanic cancer patients’ pain management status, compared to non-Hispanic cancer patients’ pain management status. The online forum was used to gather data to affirm or negate the authors’ hypothesis (Nowaczyk, 1988).

Further, the authors chose 15 respondents from a total population of 105 Hispanic cancer patients. The 15 chosen respondents were 18 years old or older. The selected respondents were of Hispanic ethnicity. The average age of the respondents is 49 years of age. 80 percent of the total 15 respondents belonged to the female gender. Almost 50 percent of the respondents graduated from middle school. Additionally, more than 90 percent of the respondents were jobless. Lastly, 60 percent of the 15 respondents are Mexicans.

The other respondents were a Chicano, a Cuban, a Guatemalan, two Hispanic Americans, and one of vague Hispanic origin. The authors explain that patient-based healthcare research includes studying their ethnic culture’s influence on healthcare delivery services (Im, Guevara & Chee, 2007). Critique of the analytical and interpretive preciseness. Substantiating the research view, the authors use impressive analytical and interpretative preciseness. Showing the statistical tools’ findings, the authors offer convincing evidence that hurdles to better cancer healthcare services should be removed, at all cost.

To ensure the findings are accurate or realistic, the 15 respondents were given wide freedom to exchange information among the other respondents. One Hispanic culture that cropped up was that Hispanic women are culturally trained to prioritize filling the needs of her children and family over her own personal needs and wants. The respondents commented that they were not forced by the researcher to pick one or more prepared answers to the forum discussions. Consequently, the average female Hispanic respondent felt that her