The researcher of this paper argues the ethics that support eating meat and presents arguments against eating meat. The arguments and ethics of vegetarians who do not consume meat and the non-vegetarians who consume meat are ongoing since many centuries…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Extract of sample "The ethics that support meat eaters and non-meat eaters"
Download file to see previous pages
The paper tells that the ethics that support eating meat is the question of survival and leading a healthy life. Other than the preferences of taste and culinary matters, meat provides many proteins, vitamins, and other nutrients that are vital for people to lead a healthy life. Meat provides sufficient fat and nutrients, especially to people living in regions, where it is difficult to subsist on vegetarian food. Some examples of such regions include the Polar Regions and the desert areas, where it is difficult to grow plants in sufficient numbers, to support a growing population. The issue of killing living things becomes irrelevant since even vegans consume many products such as cosmetics, oils, medicines, wear leather shoes, and fur, all obtained from animals and their body parts. Countless animals are killed during farming, and these include insects, earthworms and others 'non-glamorous' animals, that thrive in their natural habitat. In fact, while clearing up forests for agriculture, thousands of animals and birds are disrupted from their natural homes and literally 'left in the wild', where they have no chances of survival. The argument that it is unethical to kill an animal, therefore, falls flat. Therefore, vegans also kill animals, maybe unwittingly, but they do aid in their killing and exploitation, in one form or another. It is therefore obvious that the argument used by vegetarians against meat eating seem hollow and filled with sycophancy.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
(“The ethics that support meat eaters and non-meat eaters Essay”, n.d.)
The ethics that support meat eaters and non-meat eaters Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1650338-eating-meat-is-ethical-and-eating-meat-is-not-ethical
(The Ethics That Support Meat Eaters and Non-Meat Eaters Essay)
The Ethics That Support Meat Eaters and Non-Meat Eaters Essay. https://studentshare.org/english/1650338-eating-meat-is-ethical-and-eating-meat-is-not-ethical.
“The Ethics That Support Meat Eaters and Non-Meat Eaters Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/english/1650338-eating-meat-is-ethical-and-eating-meat-is-not-ethical.
According to the paper many vegetarians say that their eating habit makes them healthier compared to those who take meat. Even though, we certainly will not argue against the many benefits of a vegetarian diet, there are grounds to suppose that a balanced meat and vegetarian diet is a far much healthier choice. Researchers have normally revealed that vegetarians, who fail to balance their diets with iron and Vitamin D, B12, can catch anemia.
This essay explores the issue of Organic food versus the GMO (Genetically Modified Organism) foods, the aggravated condition of meat and the birth of fast food, the politics of fastfood, lowered costs and risks to health and environment. The discussion will seek to answer the question: Is organic farming a viable and sustainable as an alternative food to meat?
Culture, custom, and upbringing are contradicting factors in regard to human dietary practices. In regard to human anatomy and physiology, meat cuisine will be discussed in this paper; the main topic of interest will be “what makes an animal an acceptable food item, why is this interesting to social or biological anthropologists?
The author states that, according to the USDA, ground beef that has already been cooked is allowed to contain up to 60% water, typically between 55% and 60%. The USDA recognizes that claims made by fast-food restaurants that claim their meals are made with 100% beef are accurate, because they do not refer to the final product.
I have picked out Vincent Van Gogh’s two stupefying paintings for comparison, The Potato Eaters and The Starry Night. These two paintings are considered to be the masterpieces of Van Gogh. The notable contrasting feature of the two paintings is that The Potato Eaters looks natural whereas The Starry Night seems chimerical.
For ages people always ate meat because it was one of the general components of their food allowance, but now when our society stands on the brink of future technology, we meet the problems of life prolongation but not losing efficiency. The problem of choosing between vegetarians and meat eater is troubling people all over the world.
The debate of vegetarian diets versus eating meat has been at the forefront of health magazines. Different nutrition specialists offer different positions on the issue of vegetarianism. Most of the supporters of vegetarianism argue from a health perspective with claims that meat, especially red meat is unhealthy.
In 2008, the US Food and Drug Administration announced that it was not sure whether meat from cloned animals was being sold to unsuspecting customers. USDA, however, moved that cloned meat was fit for consumption and that consumers should not worry or even require that cloned meat be labeled.
In this chapter, the authors, Singer and Mason, are trying to show how our milk and meat farms operate and how we treat our animals. In the process, they raised the question about why it would be that we have different nomenclature for animal acts. Instead of giving birth, they “farrow.” Instead of eating, they “feed.” Instead of being pregnant, they “gestate.” The implication is that we use different terms for animals, so that we can continue with the delusion that animals are so separate from us that they do not have the same feelings, thoughts and emotions that we do.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"The ethics that support meat eaters and non-meat eaters"
with a personal 20% discount.