Download file to see previous pages...
th Tidwell (August 15, 1996), the Columbine High School shootings on May 20, 1999 the Campbell County High School shooting on November 8, 2005, the Chardon High School shootings on February 27, 2012, the 2012 Aurora shootings, the Santa Monica shooting in 2013, the John F. Kennedy High School and Cesar Chavez Elementary School shootings in 2014 are some of the few examples of gun violence. Because of the profound prevalence of gun crimes, Vice President Joe Biden has been n tasked with looking at the list of recommendations on gun policy to the US President, Barrack Obama. Banning guns or gun ownership may not be a solution, even though there are those who have touted the move as a tenable alternative.
Banning guns will not be a tenable solution to gun violence and the misuse of guns because doing so is making the assumption that a gun is an immoral object. On the contrary, just like any non-living thing, guns in themselves are amoral. Guns in the hands of responsible and law abiding citizens are merely tools of self-preservation, defense and maintenance of law and order. It is important to factor the truth that those who engage in gun violence and mass shootings are a small minority in the US population. In this case, banning guns would be infringing on the rights of the majority in the United States, to solve a section of the minority’s problems. Also, in this light, banning guns is an act that will be tantamount to deny law abiding citizens the right to protect themselves from criminals. The converse is also true that in the hands of troubled minds or people with criminal intent, guns will also become tools of terror, murder and grave injustice. In this case, it will be important that corrective measures are expended to deal with the portion of the minority that cannot handle gun rights well.
That guns are amoral as previously stated in the discourse means that banning guns may not necessarily reduce crime. According to research studies on the 1994 Assault
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Gun should not be banned Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1639556-gun-should-not-be-banned
(Gun Should Not Be Banned Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
“Gun Should Not Be Banned Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/english/1639556-gun-should-not-be-banned.
Gun control laws have been passed to reduce gun violence but the question remains whether these laws tend to actually lessen gun violence or they make the society more vulnerable. This speech favors the fact that eliminating guns from the scene does not play any role in improving safety.
In 2006, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) reported that total of 11,600 homicides were committed with firearms, claiming 68% of all homicides (Kleck, 2009: p. 1). In addition, about 100,000 to 150,000 people a year suffer non-fatal gunshot injuries (Kleck, 2009: p.
The use of guns must be controlled so as to ensure public safety and social order. Once the permission to use guns is given to an individual, the liberty and free life of the fellow beings are encroached. Gun control generally refers to the effective management of firearms to reduce the criminal use of all such weapons.
In essence, the march leading to a demonstration basically called for gun control albeit it sugarcoated its approach by citing rhetorics that does sound like gun control (i.e. gun responsibility). It was a knee jerk response to the recent shooting in Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut that left 20 children and six adults dead (Martinez and Scmidt).
Gun control leads to focusing on appropriate use of firearms, that may be used inappropriately and in an improper violating way by others. There are legislations and laws are designed for the use of firearms. Most of the legislations are designed focusing on the reduced use of forearms and protecting the rights of common men and individuals.
Although this issue has long existed below the surface, several instances of extreme brutality via the instrument of the gun have spurred lawmakers and the Democratic controlled Senate to attempt to revive the debate and attempt to gain some traction where none has previously been possible.
The contending perspectives on the federal role in combating gun violence expanded the public debate over firearms regulations in recent years amid the furor over the series of assassinations, the racial riots,
ormulated such that people do not easily access guns and the police force should be reoriented about the measures they can take when dealing with a riotous crowd rather than just opening fire. As such, this paper is going to explore the reasons why stricter gun control is not