Course: Instructional Design and Development. Assignment#9 - Essay Example

Assignment 9: Comparative Learner Evaluations COMM 600-001: Instructional Design and Development Dr. Luis C. Almeida October 2, Assignment 9: Comparative Learner EvaluationsIn presenting the comparative details and analysis among learner evaluations that are criterion-referenced and norm-referenced, the following tabular presentation highlights the differentiating features:Comparative FeaturesCriterion ReferencedNorm ReferencedBasis of JudgmentLearners’ level of competenceEvaluation results ranked and compared with other learners’ rankingCriteria for determining competence (Criterion Referenced) or determining rating (for Norm Referenced)Specific criterion such as: answering a quantified number of questions answered; skills demonstrated within a given time frameUse of different examinations such as the Graduate Record Exam (Brown & Green, 2005, p. 141). The similarity between the criterion-referenced and the norm-referenced learner evaluations is seen in terms of serving defined and useful purposes.

On the other hand, their disparities lie in being able to generate more useful results; where the criterion referenced was allegedly reported to generate more useful results which would be instrumental for educators and instructional designers to discern learning gaps and therefore, be able to accurately address these gaps and weaknesses. The norm-referenced learner evaluation method was reported to be unable to accurately measure competency level of identified learners; and therefore, this method could not appropriately recommend areas of learning improvement.

ReferenceBrown, A., & Green, T. (2005). The Essentials of Instructional Design: Connecting Fundamental Principles with Process and Practice. Prentice Hall.