StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Threat from Terrorism on Restriction of Civil Liberties - Annotated Bibliography Example

Cite this document
Summary
This annotated bibliography "Threat from Terrorism on Restriction of Civil Liberties" uses social and political theory to explain terrorism reactions from the public. This is different from other sources and so it will be useful in understanding terrorism from the perspective of deliberative democracy…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.3% of users find it useful
Threat from Terrorism on Restriction of Civil Liberties
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Threat from Terrorism on Restriction of Civil Liberties"

22 November Annotated Bibliography Allen, Michael. “Civil Disobedience and Terrorism Testing the Limits of Deliberative Democracy.” Theoria: A Journal of Social & Political Theory 56.118 (30 Mar. 2009): 15-39.Web. 22 Nov. 2011. Literary Reference Center. Deliberative Democracy concerns open communication among all stakeholders and that opinions are open to discussion and criticism. Allen studies the limitations of the commitment of deliberative democrats to communication and persuasion over threats and intimidation through investigating civil disobedience and terrorism. He argues that deliberative democrats cannot justify restrictions to terrorism. He agrees with Cohrs that fear can impact the acceptance of anti-terrorism actions and laws. The main phrase here is “civil disobedience.” For Allen, civil disobedience does not always relate to coercion and intimidation, though demonstrators also aim to generate public dialogue and use moral appeals to justice. The approach of the author is to use social and political theory to explain terrorism reactions from the public. This is different from other sources and it so it will be useful in understanding terrorism from the perspective of deliberative democracy. This article is important in emphasizing how deliberative democracy can promote peaceful means of civil disobedience. This is an interesting point on how people can avoid being terrorists themselves by resorting to violence and propaganda. This article will be useful in expanding the debate to consider how democracies are defined and how their definitions can impact the framework of and discourse on terrorism and civil liberties. CATO Institute. Combatting Terrorism, Protecting Freedom. 1996. Web. 31 Oct. 2011. . This reference approaches the subject of terrorism in a critical manner by citing the views of three speakers, Malcolm Wallop, David Kopel, and Nadine Strossen. These speakers agree that the government tends to pursue anti-terrorism policies that hurt civil liberties. They define their approaches against anti-terrorism legislation and their effects on civil liberties. The image that they are forming is that anti-terrorism laws are also anti-civil liberties. Another image is the Big Brother symbol for an authoritarian government that uses terrorism to enhance its powers, while reducing individual rights to their civil liberties. Big Brother, for them, appears paternal, but can be easily exploited by the government for their self-interests, such as reducing freedom of speech and association and privacy rights. Wallop argues that citizens should also be against anti-terrorism legislation that hamper them from enjoying their civil liberties. He calls for anti-terrorism laws that are aligned with the constitution. Kopel has a sarcastic tone when questioning anti-terrorism actions and policies. He argues that the U.K. Has numerous strict anti-terrorism actions and policies, but it only reduced civil liberties without reducing terrorist activities. Strossen emphasizes that anti-terrorism policies both threaten and hurt civil liberties. This reference is important in underscoring the costs of anti-terrorism legislation to civil liberties. It shows that increasing the powers of the government costs people their civil liberties. Cohrs, J. Christopher, Kielmann, Sven, Maes, Jürgen, and Barbara Moschner. “Effects of Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Threat from Terrorism on Restriction of Civil Liberties.” Analyses of Social Issues & Public Policy (2005). Web. 22 Nov. 2011. Academic Source Premier. Authors examined how right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), social dominance orientation (SDO), personal values, and political ideology could affect attitudes toward reduction of civil liberties and surveillance measured after one year through an Internet survey. Findings showed that RWA, SDO, political ideology, security values, and self-direction values were strong predictors of attitudes toward reduction of civil liberties and surveillance. Their approach focuses on how it is possible that people accept restrictions on their civil liberties during threats of terrorism. The main image of this text is that RWA encourages attitudes of ethnocentrism and fear that can allow favorable attitudes toward surveillance and fewer or weaker civil liberties. When compared to Thorson, this article has a more psychological perspective. It shows that RWA creates a psyche of submission and prejudice that makes it easier for people to accept restricted civil liberties, especially when they are designed to attack certain ethnic or racial groups. This text contributes to the understanding of the interplay between government and personal values and acceptance of anti-terrorism laws that can reduce civil liberties. It is possible that a certain political leaning can be enhanced on a national level, so that greater support for anti-terrorism laws can be accumulated, even if they violate civil liberties. Greenwald, Abe. “A Decade after 9/11 What We Got Right in the War on Terror.” Commentary 132.2 (2011): 14-27. Web. 31 Oct. 2011. Literary Reference Center. The main point of this article is that the government has been mainly effective in curbing terrorism. The author takes the approach against national security arguments that defend anti-terrorism laws. Abe argues that because of fighting in Iraq, Bin Laden fell, and terrorism groups followed thereafter. He justifies the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as critical to undermining the terrorist network of Bin Laden. The word that is repeatedly used is “closure.” Abe notes that though it is important that 9/11 victims feel a sense of closure after Bin Ladens death, it is equally important that terrorists also feel the same “closure.” It connects anti-terrorism with the Arab Spring, as Abe calls for the U.S. to steer these Arab nations away from terrorist ideologies. Abe also cautions the government against anti-terrorism measures that reinforces anarchy. This reference is far from what CATO and Thorson reported on, because the approach is significantly supportive of anti-terrorism legislation and measures. This approach is taken against the perspective of providing both immediate/short-term and long-term actions against terrorism. This article is important in providing an opposing viewpoint to CATO and Thorson and will help balance my learning about terrorism. It is crucial to have different perspectives on terrorism, so that its effect on civil liberties can be more fully appreciated. Perkins, Jared. “Habeas Corpus in the War Against Terrorism: Hamdi v. Rumsfeld and Citizen Enemy Combatants.” BYU Journal of Public Law 19.2 (2005): 437-471. Web. 22 Nov. 2011. Advanced Placement Source. Perkins explores the loss of habeas corpus because of the War Against Terrorism. It gives the case of Hamdi, whose habeas corpus right has been suspended, because he was treated as an enemy combatant. The article argues that the judiciary should prevent public fear and outrage from undermining the Constitution. The main words are habeas corpus, which is a core Constitutional right. Habeas corpus is the Latin for "you have the body". It is a writ (court order) which stresses that the law enforcement officials should allow prisoners to appear in court to determine the legality of detention. This enables prisoners to have their claims be heard by the court. It takes the political trend of relying on the Supreme Court to settle questions of constitutionality. The approach of the write is from the legal viewpoint. From this perspective, it supports the protection of civil liberties and prevention of abuses of executive power. Like the CATO Institute, Perkins emphasizes the importance of civil liberties versus national security. The government will have a hard time justifying sacrifices of civil liberties in this context. This article is important because it allows readers to focus on one aspect of law that anti-terrorism laws violate. Poscher, Ralf. “Terrorism and the Constitution.” Dissent 56.1 (2009): 13-18. Web. 22 Nov. 2011. Academic Source Premier. Poscher shows the cleavage in the Supreme Court because of the unconstitutional features of anti-terrorism legislation and this division affects their rulings. Sometimes, they rule for individual civil liberties, and yet at times, they also rule in favor of anti-terrorism measures, due to national security concerns. His approach toward the topic is that people continue to be divided on whether anti-terrorism laws are constitutional or not. The image that is projected by the text is that the Supreme Court has the supreme responsibility in ensuring that laws are constitutional. The approach is legal and focuses on the relationship between rulings and modern interpretations of the Constitution in the age of terrorism. Also, Poscher agrees with Southwood that anti-terrorism actions should not sacrifice human dignity that civil liberties protect. This article is important because it gives examples on the Courts decision on related terrorist cases. It helps readers understand that terrorism is not a one-way street and that it continues to affect people and their institutions. Poscher provides additional support to people who oppose the unconstitutional nature of anti-terrorism legislation. Nevertheless, since Supreme Court is divided in the issue of constitutionality of anti-terrorism legislation, people will remain unsure how long these laws will take effect. Southwood, Nicholas and John Humphreys. “Can We Preserve Liberty in an Age of Terrorism?” Policy 20.1 (2004): 28-35. Web. 22 Nov. 2011. Academic Source Premier. This article provides two essays from Southwood and Humphreys. They confirm that terrorism does not preserve liberty. The image that is repeated is that of the government posing to preserve liberties or reduce it because it is only rational during the age of terrorism. It also repeats the word fear, because the government has effectively used “fear” to gain massive support for its sweeping anti-terrorism laws. The authors take the approach that terrorism cannot justify the loss of civil liberties. Fear reduce logic among people, which enhances their vulnerability to increasing executive powers that can allay their fears of loss of power. Southwood believes that liberty is not absolute and that in the age of terrorism, it is fitting to balance liberties with security needs, but it is not right to sacrifice civil liberties for national security. Giving up civil liberties is considered as a plus point for terrorism for him. Humphreys emphasizes that the West is to be blamed on the reduction of civil liberties, not terrorism. This article is important in supporting the alignment of anti-terrorism with civil liberties. This paper poses the irony that fear results to greater fear, when the terrorists become the government itself. Thorson, Carl. Terrorism vs. Civil Rights: A Debate. 2003. Web. 31 Oct. 2011. . This source summarizes the symposium on the conflict between terrorism and civil rights. They agree with the reservations of the speakers from the CATO Institute regarding the ability of anti-terrorism laws in protecting civil liberties. The image that is being repeated here is that terrorism violates civil rights, because the more the government tries to protect people from terrorism, the more they lack protection of the latters civil rights. Several speakers examined the debate on terrorism and its effects on civil liberties. Ben Wizner, attorney for the ACLU of Southern California, stresses that the governments reaction to 9/11 was too “sweeping,” and that Congress barely discussed and analyzed the impacts of new security activities on civil rights. Wizner does not agree with the argument of the government that security needs take precedent over civil rights. Scott Bowman, Political Science Professor from Cal State LA, argues that since 9/11, there had been greater secrecy and more powers given to the executive branch, which are dominant traits of totalitarianism. Professor Terri Givens agrees with Kopel that the UK has initiated these anti-terrorism laws, but they had not effectively stamped out terrorism. This reference is important, because it gives several perspectives on the negative effects of terrorism on civil liberties. They also reinforce the beliefs of speakers from the CATO Institute. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Bibliography Annotated Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words”, n.d.)
Bibliography Annotated Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1584656-bibliography
(Bibliography Annotated Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words)
Bibliography Annotated Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words. https://studentshare.org/english/1584656-bibliography.
“Bibliography Annotated Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/english/1584656-bibliography.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Threat from Terrorism on Restriction of Civil Liberties

Definition, Association, and the Concepts Surrounding Terrorism

Others linked it with civil disobedience while others label it as an act of violence.... civil disobedience is deemed acceptable by many deliberative democrats as long as it remains relevantly tied to the objective of communicative action (Allen 15).... civil Disobedience is one of the terms confused with terrorism for the reason that some governments might label such acts as a form of terrorism even though for the ones doing it, their main objective was only to find a means for their voices to be heard and for their standpoints to be given attention....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Securing America and Protecting civil Liberties

The researcher of this assignment is being carried out to look at the restriction of civil liberties in the Bill of Rights in order to protect Americans from terrorist organizations.... This shows a restriction of the civil liberties.... The First Amendment comprises several vital rights that guarantee an individual's basic civil liberties such as freedom to speech, freedom to associate, freedom of the press, and freedom to religion.... The civil liberties have protection against government restriction and interference by other individuals....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Securing America and Protecting Civil Liberties

Securing America and Protecting civil liberties Name University Securing America and Protecting civil liberties George W.... However a fee months after the 9/11, it seemed like everything began to change as the evolution of the national security policies began to take place which not only posed a challenge to the American value of the civil liberties but posed a threat to the fundamental constitutional rights of the people who have little or no links with terrorism....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Securing America and Protecting Civil Liberties

The limiting of civil liberties has been done with the view that citizens were bound to accept restrictions as a cost for heightened security.... Moreover, the violation of civil liberties was because of the government attempt to modernize its abilities in all sectors.... However, the violation of civil liberties through the enactment of legislation was important in ensuring national security.... Running head: Securing America and Protecting civil liberties Securing America and Protecting civil liberties Introduction The US government came up with stringent measures following the terrorist attacks in 2011....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Anti-Terrorism and Human Rights

What these operations have in difference with human rights is the close political scrutiny and control, and therefore, they require intimate civil, military, and police cooperation at all times.... This essay "Anti-terrorism and Human Rights" talks about of fact the ultimate goals of "war on terror" and "establishing a framework of human rights" seem to deviate but reach a single conclusion, i.... On one hand anti-terrorist organizations while taking into account anti-terrorism legislation in Britain contemplate the idea of admitting evidence that can be presented at trials of defendants suspected of involvement with terrorist organizations, while on the other hand, HRA allows claimants to enforce Convention rights in British courts....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Terrorism and civil liberties in the UK

Some examples of the curbing of civil liberties of ordinary citizens are the curtailment of the right of public protest, control orders, indefinite detention and arrests without warrants.... In the paper 'Terrorism and civil liberties in the UK » the author analyzes the unprecedented terrorist attack on 9/11 in the United States and in London, on July 7, 2005.... These attacks have produced legislation such as the terrorism Act of 2000 and Anti terrorism Crime and Security Act of 2001....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Terrorism as the Most Dangerous Threats to the National Security

There are necessary measures, like the curtailment of civil liberties, which have to be employed in order to counter the threat of terrorism.... As we put more value to protecting our civil liberties.... Afeef smartly points out that curtailing civil liberties in the US in the name of national security does not seem to be a far-fetched idea especially when the current civil situation in the US is considered.... An opinion survey conducted by YouGov in the UK sought people's perception or opinion about the government's proposal to control civil liberties and the survey revealed that a great majority of respondents believe that it is appropriate to curtail the movements of terrorist suspects even if the usual trial policies cannot be applied to them....
12 Pages (3000 words) Research Paper

Terrorism And Counter-Terrorism

Most of these acts have included specific provisions that allow both the state and federal governments to bypass some civil liberties when fighting against terrorism-related crimes.... terrorism refers to any act of violence against civilian's targets.... The paper "terrorism And Counter-terrorism" critically analyzes the new terrorism threats facing the USA as well as the effectiveness of the current provisions of the anti-terrorism legislation....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us