Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1582453-refute
https://studentshare.org/english/1582453-refute.
Similarly, the author’s campaign for rising minimum wages, to encourage the legal citizens of America to assume the job places they have shunned cannot be founded on facts, because there could be other reasons why Americans develop negative attitudes towards the said jobs.
Moreover, putting minimum wage in place can decrease the productivity of American industries, and the competing foreign industries would have a better hand in the market, which will detriment the economy. At the same time, some small industries that may not be able to accommodate the set minimum wage would close down. By increasing the minimum wage, and not putting measures against illegal immigration, can lead to advantaging the already settled immigrant by enhancing their pay. Illegal immigration is thus better dealt with by employing other avenues than raising the minimum wage.
The building of walls as recommended by the president can reduce the illegal, immigrations as per se, by approaching the problem from its basis. Building walls does not have to imply what the authors have made it (Dukaki & Mitchel, 2006). A better dimension of its application can be obtained objectively instead of disqualifying the whole package of the idea based on some unfounded hypothesis. After all, strictness is what the issue of illegal immigration calls for. Finally, viewing the issue of illegal immigration from the perspective of wages alone can lose the meaning of the whole agenda.
Read More