Trust Is Integrity, Honesty, and Reliability - Essay Example

Trust Is Integrity, Honesty, and Reliability Introduction. Trust in personal and professional relationships is a two-way street that is equal to integrity, honesty and reliability. This is the best way that I find to define trust. At first sight, this definition seems to be unrealistic, but in the real world it is achievable within certain limits. We have to keep in mind that human beings are not perfect, so we can’t expect perfect relationships among people. I do think that people are perfectible in the long run taking into account that the process of perfection takes a lifetime and at the same time Humankind needs the intervention from God in order to be perfect. So trust comes down to being a coherent mix of integrity, honesty, and reliability. Trust: Integrity, Honesty, and Reliability. In order to make sense out my definition of trust, it is necessary to take a closer look at all the concepts involved. While integrity relates to the idea of harmonious wholeness in any person’s attributes, honesty is related to sincerity that springs from a pure heart, and reliability has to do with the sense of responsibility and accountability when we commit ourselves to doing any task in an efficient way. Trust in personal and professional relationships is a process that takes time to be built. To equal trust to integrity, honesty, and reliability means that building trust and -most importantly- keeping trust alive in any relationship is a real challenge that we have to tackle efficiently. So trust is equivalent to integrity, honesty, and reliability on a daily and consistent basis. From my own experience, I consider that defining trust as a healthy blend of integrity, honesty, and reliability makes sense for its practical and pragmatic consequences in our lives. By defining trust in those terms, we feel a strong sense of commitment when it comes to building new personal and professional relationships, and especially when it comes to keeping alive those trustworthy relationships. Conclusion. A very good definition of trust is reached when we see it as synonymous with integrity, honesty, and reliability. It implies beforehand that human beings are not perfect, but perfectible. So we have to strive to be trustworthy in all of our personal and professional relationships in spite of the fact that we are not perfect now. Our good will and our efforts to achieve trustworthiness bring happiness and well-being to our souls here and now. Trust Is Built and Kept Through Integrity, Honesty, and Reliability Introduction. Many people argue about the meaning of trust, but the most important aspect of trust in personal and professional relationships is the way we build it together through integrity, honesty, and reliability. The idea that trust is a one-dimension trait is widely spread, but I find it to be a multi-dimensional act as different aspects have to be taken into account when it comes to building and keeping trust in our personal and professional relationships. Building and Keeping Trust. Trust as integrity, honesty, and reliability is considered as such by many people. Some of them equal trust to only one of those dimensions, but I find it useful to deal with the issue of trust as a multi-dimensional trait. Trust is more a process than a permanent state of affairs. Trust must be built and kept alive on an ongoing basis, so many factors have to be taken into consideration when we speak about trust in our personal and professional relationships. Indeed trust takes a lot of effort to be built and maintained alive. It is easy to think of trust as integrity, or as honesty, or as reliability alone. But if we take a close look at trust, we will find that it takes those three dimensions together to build and keep trust on a daily basis. That is so because if one of the ingredients is missing, we will end up being untrustworthy in the eyes of people. We need a good mix of integrity, honesty, and reliability in order to build and establish a trustworthy relationship. Looking at trust from a multi-dimensional point of view will keep us from making unnecessary mistakes, and at the same time we will enjoy the benefits of healthy relationships. When we approach trust from a single perspective, we miss the essence of this relevant and meaningful human trait. On the other hand, when we see it as a multi-dimensional act, we can make sense out of its real significance from a more eclectic point of view. Conclusion. It is necessary to view trust from a multi-dimensional perspective. This wise position will bring a higher sense of meaning of the word “trust” as we will take into consideration integrity, honesty, and reliability at the same time when we endeavor ourselves to building and keeping a trustworthy relationship at a personal and professional level of meaningful achievement. Two Different Essays and One Similar Idea Introduction. When dealing with the issue of trust in personal and professional relationships, I dealt with this subject from two different perspectives or rhetorical modes in two essays, but the main idea underlying both papers is simply the same. There are some differences and similarities in the rhetorical approach to both themes even though the message can be considered in essence a simple idea about trust being equivalent to the sum total of integrity, honesty, and reliability. Different Rhetorical Approach with a Single Underlying Idea Essay 1 and Essay 2 have some differences and similarities on their rhetorical modes. The main difference is related to the defining and arguing points of view of both papers. While the first essay use definitions as the major rhetorical resource, the second essay relies on stating arguments in favor of its thesis. Another difference between both essays is the fact that God is mentioned in the first paper, but it is omitted in the second one. This is a deliberate stance since it didn’t seem good for me to make any argument using a metaphysical connection with the subject matter. In the first essay, the use of the idea about God as present in the discussion seemed to be a sound rhetorical point. The most important similarity between these papers is the rhetorical use of the same elements for defining and arguing about trust in personal and professional relationships. These elements are the attributes of integrity, honesty, and reliability interconnected with the idea of trust in a coherent and persuasive way. One more similarity in both papers is the use of the same structural-functional rhetorical outline. From a pragmatic point of view, both essays complement each other very well. One defines trust and the other argues about trust making the same point: Trust is equal to the sum total of integrity, honesty, and reliability. Conclusion. This type of assignment is very rewarding and valuable from the learner’s point of view since I have to be creative in the rhetorical strategies in both essays. I had to write two different essays that at the end could be compared against each other to see their rhetorical differences and similarities. This writing experience has been very relevant in my learning process. Thanks. Read More