Rethorical analysis of Deep Play - Essay Example

It should also outline the effectiveness of the techniques and examples of the techniques. It is vital to note that during a rhetorical analysis, the analyst does not simply agree with the argument outlined by the author. The rhetorical analysis discusses the techniques used by the author to make arguments. The rhetorical analysis of Diane Ackerman’s Deep Play is essential in the comprehension of the author’s objectives and the themes in the article. The heightened experiences of the society highlight issues such as creativity.

According to the article, the society honors and respects the natural world. The author tackles the issue of creativity through the exploration of essential aspects such as the ability of humans to play. The way the author tells the story shows that the ability to play is important to the society because it reflects intricate connections in the social relationships and connections of the culture (Ackerman 19). Deep Play is a brilliant ethnographic example of the theoretical change from functionalism to interpretative anthropology.

Naturalist and poet Diane Ackerman uses meandering meditation to come up with the word deep play. This word refers to a number of things within the scope of the zone and flow, in addition to sacred play. The author’s subject is characterized by ecstasy and intensity. In this case, moments in the article are heightened when the senses and mind work at full capacity. The author’s acknowledgement helps in the creation of potent content for the reader. She also relies on previous works of eco-psychology and poetry.

This content fits in the author’s broad conceit as she compiled a wide range of activities (Ackerman 22). The author is able to write using observation, which means that she shows her qualities when she writes about natural elements because they are observable. The author asserts that poetry functions as deep play, which explains why she used poetry in chapter six of her book. Her observations enabled her to make conclusions about sports. She cited professional athletes as business like people.

She also notes that amateurs are more playful than the business like professional athletes. The interpretive anthropology used by Diane Ackerman is based on the fact that meaning is possible. In this case, the meaning is interpreted because it is through differences that people can become aware of different aspects of their lives. These differences also enable them to compare these aspects. In the article Deep Play, Diane Ackerman responds to post colonial fieldwork experiences by using the constructionist theory of knowledge (Ackerman 24).

This knowledge is essential in understanding the natural world. It also helps the author to create rapturous moods that awaken creativity and joy in the reader’s inner self. In Deep Play, the author argues that structuralism is different to interpretive or symbolic anthropology. The author implies that instead of using totem rites, myths and marriage rules as textual aspects of interpretation, structuralism uses them as ciphers. According to Diane Ackerman, structuralism does not seek to understand the symbolic forms according to how they function in concrete situations (Ackerman 33).

The author seeks to understand the symbolic forms by covering panoply of spiritual, artistic and athletic activities. This plays a crucial role in understanding moments of human transcendence. Structuralism seeks to