Outline: Introduction: I:The evolution Argument A: Humans as the most highly evolved B: Discussion of what this “dominion” or evolutionary status denotes II: Rights A: The origins of rights B: Thinking and self actualization a uniquely human quality III: Disparity and differences A: No emotions B: No thoughts C: Ultimately comparing two dissimilar entities IV: The custodianship of domesticated animals A: If animal rights existed fully, then these would be extinct B: Humans have moral and ethical duties to provide protection and furtherance of nature V: Rights A: Animals cannot have rights due to the fact that they do not have reciprocal duties B: Without duties, rights are meaningless and…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Download file to see previous pages
As might be readily noted, such a sharp stance with regards to the issue of animal rights necessarily encourages many individuals to be categorically against further animal rights. This is of course due to the inherent belief that many individuals have that animals cannot be considered as sentient beings; therefore, extending any form of rights or the expectation thereof, is tantamount to extending rights to an unconscious object. Ultimately, the debate is somewhat circular due to the fact that neither animal rights activists nor their counterparts who advocate a reduction in animal rights rules and practice can definitively prove that consciousness exists within animals and therefore is worthy of a level of respect. With respect to this brief analysis, the author will propose an opposing viewpoint with regards to the inherent belief that animals should engender further rights and protections under law. Whereas it should not be noted that this analysis will take a contrary in view of the fact that animals are important, should be respected, and preserved for future generations, it will be the express intent of this author to engage the reader with an understanding for the fact that many of the fundamental arguments that animal rights activists put forward as evidence for why further animal rights should be manifested within the current world are fundamentally flawed. Firstly, it must be understood that humans are most certainly the most evolved creatures that exist on earth. By means of the process of evolution, humans have a degree of power and control with regards to their environment. For many years, individuals of a religious persuasion believed that God had given mankind “dominion” over the earth. However, whether or not one believes in evolution or whether or not one believes in intelligent design is not the issue; rather, the issue is the fact that the overall intellects and functional capacity of humans necessarily places them in a situation that they are able to make a discerning judgments and determine value based upon the needs and rights of the environment around them. Said one author, “There are a lot of people in the animal rights movement who can be very passionate and aggressive, and I applaud people's passion, but when people are judgmental and aggressive, all they end up doing is getting other people to turn away in irritation” (Monastersky 12). For instance, many individuals point to the fact that further rights should be extended to animals. However, an understanding of rights and how these rights originate ultimately is derived from philosophical the value and the means through which a level of inequality is represented. For this very reason, it was not until the 20th century that individuals within society began to take note of the fact that a moral and ethical interpretation of the world necessitated that rights and privileges be
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Opposing sides of Animal rights Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/english/1494316-opposing-sides-of-animal-rights
(Opposing Sides of Animal Rights Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words)
“Opposing Sides of Animal Rights Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/english/1494316-opposing-sides-of-animal-rights.
However, due to the downside of the experiments, the main focus of the analysis lies on the abuse of animal rights in regard to their use in testing and financial exploitation.
Experiments on animals have played a crucial role in the lives of both animals and humankind;
It is hard to believe the sheer number of technological advances as the human race has made within the past few decades. However, like any type of advancement, the price of this technological advancement has been an explosion of comfort and consumption oriented industries; not the least of which is that of “fast food”.
But scholars have failed to reach any unanimous conclusion. Anyway, while deciding whether animals should rights or not, the debaters mainly focus on several factors such as animal ability to learn, to use language, the level of their consciousness, their ability to feel pain, etc.
Two opposing sides emerge from this problem: Those opposed to abortion, "Pro-life", have concerns about protecting human life. On the other hand, those in favor of abortion, "Pro-choice", feel it is the right of the individual to make the decision for themselves.
History would provide some evidence even of man being buried together with his pet animal as revealed in some archaeological studies, indicating man’s closeness to animals, particularly dogs. In fact, even to the present day, dogs, among other animals, have proven themselves to have great utility value to men, after having shown that they can herd, they can hunt, they can track, they can sled, they can police, they can identify, they can sniff and entertain and do a host of other special skills that men would be less capable of doing.
The conclusion from this study states that animal welfare law covers the treatment of animals by their handlers during research, exhibition or transport. The laws cover the lowest acceptable standards of care that should be provided to the animals. Animal rights laws ensure just treatment of animal to ensure that they do not suffer.
ither way one looks at it, the fact remains that as the ones who are at the top of the taxonomic hierarchy, we ought to take it upon ourselves to be responsible “overseers” of other animals. Thus, I believe that we have a moral obligation to treat animals the right
It has given a lot of ease to the humans but alongside, animals are suffering from industrialization and revolutionary changes. Rapid growth in the past century or so has modernized the traditional food intake process. People are now more
Animal research has played a key role in the advancements in psychological knowledge over the twentieth century. In this regard the American Association for the Advancement of Science in the year 1990 clearly presented this fact in these words, “The use of animals has been and continues to be essential….
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the research paper on your topic
"Opposing sides of Animal rights"
with a personal 20% discount.