The paper will reach a conclusion, through a discussion of the consistency of anti-speciesist’s resolution of the rewilding nature. This paper will relate this failure to the historical views over the interrelations between humans, nature and other animals, which is still depicting wide disparities…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Download file to see previous pages
The author of the reprot talks about Alan Holland’s review of animal rights which depicts depth and richness, making it a helpful tool in solving disputes and practical problems. This report can be viewed as one side of a discourse with Holland, focusing on the main themes in this area of study. The report will start by characterizing speciesism, including a claim that many individuals are in support of rejecting it, irrespective of the fact that they never fail to sanction what is apparently the obvious effects of rejecting the issue. This paper will relate this failure to the historical views over the interrelations between humans, nature and other animals, which is still depicting wide disparities. This report holds that, while a thorough anti-speciesism values the maxim that ‘humans are an aspect of the natural world’, these dodges will not be present. The paper will reach a conclusion, through a discussion of the consistency of anti-speciesist’s resolution of the rewilding nature. The points explained through the paper include that under the issue of predation and eating meat, a guardian farmer of a domesticated animal holds the right to slaughter it for meat or trade it for money and the goodness of humans as compared to the cruelty of the wild, bestows extra rights on the human than the animal. Thirdly, when using the case of rewilding nature, man holds more rights to animals due to the services they offer to the natural world and animals (Signal and Taylor 147-157). Under speciesism and the view on the rights of animals, many people in today’s world will regard that animals hold rights. This is evident from popular parlance, informal polls and recent legislation. In jurisdictions like California, Colorado, Boulder and Berkeley, people are not viewed as the owners of pets, but instead, they are viewed as the guardians to their animal companions (AMVA). During the mid 1990s, the NORC (National Opinion Research Center) at the University of Chicago questioned a sample representing the American population, whether they were in agreement with this statement: “animals should hold the moral rights that humans have”. From the surveys, 35% of the respondent in one survey and 39% in the second were in agreement or strongly in agreement with the statement (Regan 205-211). The results from the survey could understate the universal sentiments held about animals, because not all anti-vivisectionists and vegetarians hold that animals posses rights. Further, it is not that all the people that regard animals have rights, view that they hold as much rights as human beings. For example, it is a fact that humans and all species of animals posses similar moral rights. For instance, humans hold the right to engage in their religious practices, and eagles hold the right to fly in the sky, but humans do not hold the right to flight, and neither do eagles hold rights to religious practices. The comparison shows that in the case that a given entity hold certain rights, the rights are linked to the capacity of the given entity. For example, only the creatures that can engage in religious practices hold the rights to practice religion, and only the creatures that can fly hold the right to flight. However, it is not that all capacities are linked to a given area of rights, for example, considering that humans hold the capacity to murder, but they do not hold the r
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Should Animals Have Their Own Rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1483910-should-animals-have-their-own-rights
(Should Animals Have Their Own Rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words)
“Should Animals Have Their Own Rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/english/1483910-should-animals-have-their-own-rights.
The author states that postmaterialism also involves the changes brought about in the realm of human-nonhuman relations. Postmaterialism mainly deals with the value changes in the society. Scarcity and socialisation are the basic themes which Inglehart follows in defining the attitude change towards animal rights.
The core thesis of Singer’s work is hinged on four suppositions: (1) "Suffering and death from lack of food, shelter and medical care are bad" (2) "If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, then we ought, morally, to do it", (3) "It makes no moral difference whether the person I can help is a neighbor's child ten yards from me or a Bengali whose name I shall never know, ten thousand miles away", and (4) "The principle makes no distinction between cases in which I am the only person who could possibly do anything and cases in which I am just one among millions in the same position".
What Rights Should Animals Have?
Animal rights as noted by Buzzle (2012) are also called animal liberation. It is a concept to ensure that animal rights are protected as equally as those of human beings. These rights are there to ensure that human beings do not harm, exploit, abuse or kill animals aimlessly.
The main purpose behind elucidating the topic under-consideration includes the violation of these rights witnessed by the humans; consequently, the paper lays stress upon the animals rights and condemns the exploitation of these speechless creatures being exercised by humans at residences, zoos and predominantly in circuses, where “their rights are completely neglected by their owners, by denying their proper food, healthcare and look after necessary for the well-being of these hapless living beings”
These differences, such as physical strength and mental ability, are accepted as part of being a member of the human race. Humans are considered equal even when there is a large divergence in their ability to solve problems, grasp science, and understand the concept of God.
This essay discusses the rights of animals in the modern times. Sadly enough even in the twenty first century, we as humans are not averse to the idea of using live animals for medical research, genetic experimentation, and hunting. As if making concrete jungles upon their natural habitats was not enough we have locked them in zoo's ,made them extinct for their furs and teeth and exploited them for food.The issues regarding animal rights are just one aspect of respect for all the living organisms of Mother Earth.
He of course is not talking about the rights that shouldn't be discussed, and immediately dismisses those. But the rights that do matter, those are the one that he feels should not just be given to us, but all animals.
If presented with the topic of animal experimentation, even if it was harmless, I believe that Singer would bounce the question back at the asker and ask if they would feel comfortable running the test on a human.
I personally believe that animals have rights too and they should be given due attention. It is not moral to use animals for trivial research purposes. My argument is that of moral significance. If we are sacrificing animals for a
The views held by such individuals depend on emotional, moralistic, or practical grounds. Many people base on the emotional and practical aspects of the relationship and forget the rest. Such individuals always
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Should Animals Have Their Own Rights"
with a personal 20% discount.