Compare and contrast two articles - Essay Example

In comparison, Max’s Understanding Comparison in Criminal Justice Research: An Interpretive Perspective journal explores the implications on interpretive philosophies. It investigates the values and beliefs in the context of social sciences developed by intellectuals such as Peter Winch and Max Weber. The objectives of these works are comparative research in criminal justice. It addresses the definitive meaning personality of human activities. However, unlike postmodernism and constructivism this theory pays attribute to the disposition and goals of institutional realities.

Therefore, the principle of this assignment is to compare and contrast the presentations of the two authors with close reference to methods and findings applied in each of the documents. It is easy for the reader to notice these scholarly pieces are similar in not one but many ways. Michelle Newton goes on to articulate her profound knowledge in giving simplified evidences that gives the booklover an excellent resource that aids in accounting for the promises of degrees in sociology. She also exposes students to career paths that they did not previously take into deep appreciation and may not have known the existence of these opportunities.

This serves as the basis for incorporating new perspectives of populations marginalized or in other words the voices from the field. As an accumulation of the connection, Max Travers’ draws heavily on American empirical and experimental lessons that make use of qualitative techniques to give reason to statistical variation. They are similar in that they both reveal and display interpretive traditions and often find it complex to free them from activists assumptions. They fail to conduct investigations about how social players engage and understand in comparison to each and every day lifestyle.

In conclusion, they also present a discussion of the data gathered, processed, analyzed and documented without the exclusion of the procedures brought into play in ethnographic studies of children's courts in Australia. This is a demonstration of how consistent and thorough come within reach of the interpretive structure (Michelle, 2009). The main difference is the fact that Mitchell and Max submit applications that does not utilize parallel modus operandi of gathering and processing data. The ways to inquire for information of Max’s work involves the journeying of unconventional agendas and mechanical approaches that are very significant in knowing criminal justice.

It is imperative to consider that these systems should take account of marginalized voices for the enhancement of the richness of our apprehension of justice and crime. Max introduces his ideas through citing other affiliated authors such as Hillary Potter and Joanne Belknap confronting students to seriously consider how their identities, beliefs, and life experiences help them in selecting the profession. This serves the purpose of guiding the impacts the criminal justice work and linked views.

Max gathers a lot of information from already published academic journals in the draft of his final copies. This assures that the execution of the secondary information offers credible correlation to the main points that he wishes to make known to the audience and reader. In comparison, Michelle believes that in social sciences many acknowledge the fact that philosophical postulations underpin dissimilar programs of pragmatic