Nobody downloaded yet

Argument - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Name: Course: Date: Categorical Imperative Decision Theory Kantian Categorical Imperative theory is the most preferred theory that explains decision making under any given circumstances by any individual. This is because; the CI theory precisely elaborates the presence of a self governing reasons in each individual that makes it imperative for each individual to be treated with equal worth, and deserving equal respect…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.8% of users find it useful
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample

Download file to see previous pages For example, CI requires that a rational individual is moral if the end of their actions is to promote the good of all. Therefore, CI is the best theory in precisely articulating human reasoning and decision making, and relating these to free human will compared to other decision theories. Moral actions are indicative of rationality, with an immoral action indicating irrationality in an individual. A moral action has to be universal in that it has to stand true in any event anywhere. For example, stealing is immoral; it causes pain to the owner while it may result to pleasure in the one stealing. Causing pain is immoral as it leads to suffering, implying that such an act when committed by a rational being would be immoral. Stealing is thus a crime universally as it violates CI theory, which is a universal law of morals. Being a universal law, Kantian CI becomes the best theory that explains why individuals have to decide in a certain way. For example, considering the relational Dialects theory in a similar case, the theory requires us to consider issues around us, which help people to construct meaning in any relation. Thus the theory is based on specific circumstances as it requires one to consider cultural and social rational systems. This implies the theory applies to multicultural diversity (Turner, 2004). Thus stealing according to this theory may be justified in some cases as it directs people to construct certain meanings in a specific setting of relationships. On the other hand, the how we decide theory is largely based on observable behavior from outside as one cannot access the mind of the individual. For example, asking why does a an individual steal would lead to detailed examinations of their behaviors and history in finding elements that may explain such behaviors in deciding if the individual is actually on the wrong. Such an observation may sometimes be inaccurate and may lead to a wrong conclusion. Therefore, the advantage of CI theory is that it is based on a universal law and is not relative as the other two theories, which depend on specific circumstances. The issue of personal freedom in making a decision is of much importance, and precisely bestows the responsibility of an action on the particular individual. As Kant’s CI theory explains, freedom is an important element in reasoning, whose function cannot be ignored. Thus, without assuming freedom, an individual cannot act (McCormick, 2005). In other words, an individual is not a robot or causal agent that only serves to implement orders. Thinking in such direction would deny humanity its own existence and purpose. Freedom is thus a central focus in decision making and reasoning; an individual is at will to decide in any direction. In this theory, Kant places the consequence of each action on the specific individual, and not on a system of events that may be explained to be the causal agents behind such an action. However, considering the how we decide theory, the major limitation is the assumption that humans are not rational. Thus, the theory traces human action not from the specific individual, but from a system of factors and history that plays to shape and define human actions. This would relegate humanity to being a causal agent that is not responsible for ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1460448-argument
(Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words. https://studentshare.org/english/1460448-argument.
“Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/english/1460448-argument.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
The claims are strongly supported by warrants, grounds and backings. The warrants, ground, backings of the formal article’s discrimination discussion firmly supports the claims. Thesis Statement The article’s thesis is: The article’s discrimination discussion’s claims, warrants, grounds and formal language have both strengths and weaknesses.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
According to their argument, the minority groups are sidelined in terms of accessing higher education. In terms of progressive development, gaps are still noticeable in respect of education accessed by the males and females. In this regard, it seems the girl child still lag behind when considering right to education for all.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Case Note for RvR
ape upon his lawful wife (2) Applicability of the rule of common law spelt out by Hale1 that a wife could be deemed to have consented irrevocably to sexual intercourse with her husband (3) Whether Defendant’s actions in having sexual intercourse with his wife without her
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Violence amongst young people, it is claimed, is becoming increasingly common and hip-hop is partly to blame. However, not everyone sees it quite like that. Despite its negative press, hip-hop has also been seen as a
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
In his essay on this fascinating topic, Highlet shows himself to be a true believer. He describes his own relationship with Zen and shows why he thinks Zen can be more than a philosophy. One of Highlet’s main arguments in his essay is the
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Federalism refers to a scenario where partial self governing states operate under a central regime. At this level, the federates and the central government have powers that are dictated by law, and cannot be negated or ignored by either party. Anti-federalism refers to a
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Thousands of people are registering for admissions in universities for undergraduate and postgraduate courses (Useem & Miller, 126). Education levels beyond the age of 16 years are however not regarded compulsory. Many individuals and organizations keep claiming that higher
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
The unjust decision will also be a bad decision, and will deprive Socrates life of value. Firstly, Socrates asks and Crito confirms that unjust thing is unjust under any circumstances, even when responding on injustice. Then, Socrates
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
The problem of mind and body exists primarily because humans naturally desire to place the mental experience of conscious organisms into the organic and scientific categories in which other
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
This paper will attempt to provide a logically sound argument based on various ethical, legal and organizational theories, which will negate the delusion of employee rights to privacy while performing their jobs. Along with these, some managerial implications will also be discussed.
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic Argument for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us