Personal Opinion on Human Cloning - Essay Example

? Human Cloning June 14, Human cloning Introduction Human cloning refers to the use of technology to generate another human being that has the same DNA as another currently or previously existing human being (Human Genome Project Information, 2009, Para. 7). Human cloning is a controversial that elicits diverse reactions from all quarters and almost every member of the human race. The issue of cloning has caused much debate since the firs cloning of a live sheep in Scotland in 1997m due to ethics and authority to participate in the events leading to the creation of a new human being from the originally born one. This topic is crucial to the existence of human beings as it may be used to either improve their lives or degrade them. Personal Opinion In my opinion, human cloning is a gift that should be embraced by all of humanity because it has multiple benefits if made use of in appropriate ways. Cloning should be allowed among humans because it can be used to cure or improve certain conditions such as infertility. In reference to this, infertile couples can have children of their own. In addition, cloning, if allowed can be used to repair damaged tissues and organs in the human body. This is through growing new organs, which is called therapeutic cloning; that can then be used for the maintenance of the human body. This is especially so for conditions that requires transplants such as leukemia, liver and kidney failures (Human Genome Project Information, 2009, Para. 15). Cloning can be used to generate new bone marrow that can then be transplanted into the patient and, therefore, healing them of their condition. In addition, it lessens the risk and burden that loved ones have to bear in order to save their lives. This is in the form of surgery that they have to go trough so as to donate their organs for use by others. Not only can human cloning be used in the above named processes, but also in plastic and reconstructive surgeries. Cloning allows for production of body tissues that are compatible with the host, which in turn lessens the risk of tissue rejection (Advancing Science, Serving Society, 2007, Para. 5). For this reason, cloning can be used to treat conditions such as amputated limbs as they may easily be regenerated. The additional conditions that can benefit from human cloning include defective genes and genetic diseases. This would be beneficial, especially to parents that have genetic disorders. For parents considering conception, they may see a specialist to have the genes eradicated and thus ensure that they do not pass the problems on to their offspring. People Opinions The majority of those who think that human cloning should be allowed share common belief with me that it can be used for the good of human kind, and especially so in regard to health. One opinion that is outstanding is that, due to the preservation of health and even extension of life, scientists could continue to live. As a result, the world would benefit from their great discoveries and inventions. All this would be the result of recreating their minds in a different time and body. For example, if this were to happen to the Wright brothers, they would help greatly in developing space exploration and the aviation industry at large. Furthermore, others claim that for the purpose of reproducing offspring in cases of couples who cannot conceive, cloning should be legal, but only if the child will not be subjected to tests for his or her entire life. Therefore, it should be perfected before it is used for such events. In spite of all their well-argued reasons for supporting human cloning, some reasons for their support were utterly misconceived and based on fallacies of over imagination. One such thought was that cloning should be allowed in order to counter population problems. The basis of this argument was that; height and weight be regulated in order to fit people into certain special buildings. This beat the entire purpose of cloning as only clones were to be fitted into these “special buildings”. The argument goes in to say that clones should be created in order to conduct all the activities that “normal” humans hate to do, therefore, making clones like an army of workers. On the contrary, people have opinions that are against human cloning at all costs, based on religion and ethical issues. Religious people claim that cloning is playing the role of God in creation. This is as a result of creating another human being in an unnatural way and that the scientists who create them will soon begin to view themselves as gods. They, therefore, conclude that there is no reason to assume the role of god while there already exist a God. They are also against cloning as they consider it unfair to God, who creates original life and takes it, by having scientists recreate an already ended life. In addition, they are of the view that God did, in fact, put mankind in this world to make it a better place, but instead of that, mankind has only destroyed and is still destroying the earth. Therefore, responsibility will be negligible among scientists who create these clones as they will deny accountability for their actions. In addition, some people have aired their opinion about genetic engineering, thanks to cloning. In regard to determining the sex of the children that parents would like to have, if cloning is allowed, there would be gender imbalance in the world as a result of scientists creating more of one sex than another. Consequently, the human race may suffer extinction due to a sexual reproduction as compared to sexual reproduction. Moreover, there are those of the view that human cloning is a way to support alternative sexual orientations such as homosexuality (Phil, n.d. Para. 15). This is in light of the fact that, from cloning, gay couples can have children. Another opinion is that of human rights; which puts into perspective that not all persons will enjoy their full human rights because they would just be copies of one another (Phil, n.d., Para 20). The human rights opinion is based on the fact that once the original being has been given his or her rights, the clones are not eligible to enjoy them too. Considerations Those that are against the allowance of human cloning have some primitive and misguided knowledge on the entire process knowledge. Some of their opinions are based on pure fallacies, although some do hold ground. For example, those that think of taking over the role of God are mistaken. This is because, it is the same God that put us on this earth, and we are only trying what we can to make it better for ourselves and to livelonger by cloning organs that prolong our lives. However, the argument on accountability does hold water on multiple levels. This is because, without proper regulation; scientists and selfish individuals may end up using clones to accomplish evil tasks. Conclusion The issue of allowing human cloning is one that elicits a lot of debate among people. It is important to discuss the issues in order to come up with a middle ground in order to find a way forward for the benefit of humanity. References Phil, B. (n.d.). Reasons For and Against Cloning. Retrieved on June 14, 2012, from http://www.philforhumanity.com/Human_Cloning.html Human Genome Project Information (May 11, 2009), Cloning Fact Sheet. Retrieved on June 14, 2012, from http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/elsi/cloning.shtml Advancing Science, Serving Society (June 6, 2007), AAAS Policy Brief: Human Cloning. Retrieved on June 14, 2012, from http://www.aaas.org/spp/cstc/briefs/cloning/index.shtml Read More