Ronald Ernest Ron Paul - Essay Example

Paul was criticizing the same Congress in which he was part of it. Many critics observed that the criticism from Paul was meant for individual benefits, especially as a campaign tool. He was quoted in his speech saying, “I think Congress is about 20 years behind” (Ron Paul’s Speech). In his speech, he dwelt on the need to critically articulate the issues related to foreign and domestic strategy issues, which he said negatively impacted the economy and he said the country was headed to an economical crisis. Ironically, Ron Paul’s criticism was on the same congress, which he is part of. He is one of the unsuccessful members of Congressgress, yet he appears the top critic.
Ronald Ernest “Ron” Paul is one of the renowned United States Congressmen and emerged to be a repeat presidential candidature, having contented for the presidency in 1988, 2008, and 2012. In the year 1988, he was the presidential candidate for the Libertarian Party in the 12-year break in the years when he was a Republican Congressman.

In 2008, Ronald Ernest was the presidential nominee for the Republican Party. He believes in the supremacy of the Constitution and he never proposes a bill to be approved i.e. Congress, unless it is provided in the Constitution. He is presently contesting for the presidency under the nomination for the Republican Party in the United States (Schoen & Rasmussen 102).

He is a leading critic of both American foreign and financial policies, prominent for openly opposing the Republican Party where he belongs on certain contentious issues. He has been continuously elected 10 terms into the House of Representatives since 1979, which was uninterrupted for 12 years. During his 2008 contestation for the presidency under the Republican Party, he was the chief architect behind the advocacy movement Campaign for Liberty and his ideas have been evidenced in his speeches, journals, and books.
He has become a leading critic in the aspects of civil liberties, gay marriage, taxation policies, foreign policies, health care, entitlements, and abortion. Paul believes and understands that liberties in the market, reducing business regulations, and lowering taxes will boost the market strategies, as well as promote a favorable business environment. According to him, these aspects will have positive impacts on the economy of the United States and also increase employment opportunities within the market environment. He is the chief critic of the Federal Reserve, arguing that this will present serious implications for the economy of the country. He said in his speech while at Michigan University addressing students that this will lead to the aspect of bust and boom leading to financial crisis both in the United States and in the global platform. The boom and bust within the economy will promote unethical business practices (Schoen & Rasmussen 89).

In his speech, he said, “The federal government does a lousy job providing the atmosphere necessary to be competitive and be able to compete around the world because they overtax and they over-regulate “. In his entire speech in Michigan, he put more emphasis on the element of abolishing the Federal Reserve, an economic entity that he argued is guilty of collapsing the U.S. dollar value and obstructing, not assisting, the U.S. economy. He said in his speech that the labor policies should be revisited by Congress where he advocated for a countrywide Right to work policy (Schoen & Rasmussen 123). He said that the undue impacts of “Big Labor “in the economic mainstream and other issues should be sufficient reasons for passing such a law countrywide.

Paul in a speech said that” States have tried to get around this by having Right to work laws, and try to compensate for the special power that has been granted to the unions”. He argued that this with deforming the market and the states in the United States would demand compensation. According to him, because they have suffered they need to address the compensation aspect. Terry Bowman, president of Union Conservatives, bought Paul’s’ idea on the work law saying this was union-friendly. In his aspect of union, Paul failed to know that the union forces to join them, and in the real sense these unions do not promote the element of liberty. The unions could collect huge amounts of funds and use them for campaign purposes. The money instead could be channeled into businesses that will generate employment opportunities rather than used in politics. Therefore his idea was not a bright one, as far as persuasive reasoning is concerned.

In the rest of his speech, Paul touched on the aspects, which include defense spending and allocation, foreign policy, prerogative programs that include Social Security, and what he termed a failure of existing policies to address the menace of drugs. Against his outspoken critics, he advocated for embracing the policies and aspects of pre-World War I foreign policy, in which the government assists abroad in some regions. Furthermore, Paul expressed his concerns that there was a need to shutter the nation’s military bases globally and bring home all the armies on peacekeeping and those troops that elicited foreign conflicts. His leading proponents like Dan Schafer of Muskegon accused the mass media of stifling Ronald Paul on issues of national import (Schoen & Rasmussen 45). Read More