Ban on Corporal Punishment on School - Research Paper Example

Ban on corporal punishment on school Many individuals still take corporal punishment as a way of effectively teaching the children. Consequently, the argue may come on both sides, that is, either in support of the corporal punishment ban, or against the ban of corporal punishment as below. Ultimately, long ago, corporal punishment did come in administration normally and no one could complain. Patently, as time went by, law enactors did associate themselves to matters of running the school, this made many teachers face the law, and even some went under detention (Graziano and Kunce 130). Corporal punishment induces fear in minds of many young people, which can eventually create harm to the physical growth of their brain. The plan to abolish corporal punishment came into implementation as from far as 1970s to 1980s. According to Human Rights Watch, pupils who are under the subject of corporal punishment are nearly a quarter a million. Alternatively, the U.S department did research by interviewing and the result they came up with illustrates that if pupils do not get corporal punishment, this is the commencement of their behavior rotting. Subsequently, education is a bit challenging, and that is why corporal punishment is still in operation. Maintenance of order is difficult too; therefore, corporal punishment is quick to be put in practice since some schools may be unable to train an alternative method of embossing punishment. In addition, corporal punishment is free, that is it does not need money to train teachers on how to administer punishment in school and so it is cost effective to use such kind of punishment. On contrary, medical society for the adolescents has put into documentation with the most prominent consequences that result from corporal punishment. On the aftermath is the name of the activator and that it includes hemorrhaging and whiplash. More so, corporal punishment did lead to decline on the family life by the forceful removal of pupils at schools by the parents. The Lowdown Hitherto, in the U.S, corporal punishment is still under ban in many of the facilities of juvenile correction, but on the contrary, public schools still exercise it. Supreme Court ruling did state that cruel punishment only protects animals that are in conviction and not the students who are in classroom confinement. Hence, there is the plea to lawmakers not to manipulate ban nationally, and this is evident in the paradox of a special students teacher in Mississippi. He did say that in order to teach a child who engages in fights is possible by not to hit, it is not done by hitting them. The effects of corporal punishment This punitive act inflicts pain because of slapping, hitting, and spanking of forcing the pupil to maintain comfortable position. A proposal Title A proposal for the research projects on how corporal punishment undergoes administration. Corporal punishment (CP) Corporal punishment is the induction of physical pain to a child, in order to rectify his/her behaviors so that he/she may grow in up right manner. Research questions How do teachers administer corporal punishment? How do children find it when under the punishment? What punishment do they prefer? Can corporal punishment cease? How do teachers administer corporal punishment in your school? How can a teacher administer punishment other than using a cane? Is it mandatory to cane a pupil in order to correct his/her behavior? Literature review In general, corporal punishment is good if it is put in administration, there is a need to revive it in order to get good reliable men and women at the end. Methodology Methods applied are questionnaire and interview. The results, after a thorough analysis, can be the submission to the ministry of education or the organization for human rights and the lawmakers. This can be done face to face or through email. Significance of the result Consequential result helps in the data analysis and the decision of whether to implement punishment or not. Time line The timeline for the above research will be a week, whereby, the pupils of a chosen school will have the mandate of giving their views in a certain particular week; the analysis will come after that (Graziano and Kunce 89). The emotional climate Facilitation of delinquency and aggression in a child is in accordance with the measure of the physical punishment in progress. However, the environment is emotional whereby very few students tend to cope up with it. Nevertheless, children who get punishment in case when its administration is because of anger undergo strong emotional influence. This, in long run, affects the child’s psychological development and acts as emotional trigger. Physical punishment of children by adults raises tension in that they consider it as a lack of attention to others. Can corporal punishment commence again? Opinions arise to the response of the above questions, whereby, some agree and others do not agree with the above. Furthermore, it is clear that parents cannot do much to control their own children and so the school should come in to assist. Unfortunately, some parents still hold to the fact that caning cannot shape the children by giving vague references to the research of teachers not exercising good corporal punishment administration. Hence, physical punishment is in its threat, which will eventually cause misunderstanding among parents and teachers. Ultimately, there is fear that the generation being in progress will not have better ability to distinguish between wrong and right. Fortunately, a group for pro-CP’ers insists that system of discipline, as well as punishment, could not be effective, since this will eventually affect students’ critical thinking. Finally, there is aspect that corporal punishment in institution shows who has mandate to maintain strict discipline in the entire school. On the other hand, in alliteration, there are those who oppose corporal punishment of any form. This group explains that teachers get their pay out of teaching but, on the other side of the fence, they can also act as parents, and furthermore, it is mandatory for parents to administer ethical guidance and good moral inducement. Eventually, this sites that there is a reason for a usual behavior, hence, a strategic system can diversify it. Alternatively, every child in possession of bad habits should undergo the elimination of such demonstration. The negative effects of corporal punishment Several problems are as the results of corporal punishment in the schools. For instance, some pupils may incur brain damage and rupture of the eardrum. Vehemently, some teachers do impart hard punishment that can lead to death of some of the students (Graziano and Kunce 66). Occasionally, death does occur if a pupil takes up an exercise in its excess under the influence of the sun or bad temperature. Even though corporal punishment does not fit the best way of administering good morals to children, it is still widely used by both parents and teachers as per the survey, which did concern 2,705 pupils that were at the age of 18. According to father Muwina, corporal punishment does not necessary impact children with good morals or imposes self-discipline and respect to other when they mature. Alternatively, it creates behaviors that are not sociable and, hence, distorting sound judgments. Notably, he says that many has literally used the biblical speech that says “Spare the rod and you will spoil the child” to be the excuse on the corporal punishment administration which, in turn, causes harm to the pupils. Furthermore, corporal punishment goes against the ethical process of development whereby it dedicates children into certain behavior since they might fear the punishment that is hitherto. Unfortunately, it does not teach the children ethics and reason on which is the correct way to follow. Similarly, corporal punishment on children leads to a perception that violence is a vital response to resolution of conflict and un-wanting behavior. In addition, it teaches the children that powerful individuals have the mandate to be violent to other weaker party and, hence, be solving issues through chaos. It is pertinent that increasing degree in level of the violence in gender, especially not in favor of the women and children, is observed because of the outdated and alarming way of discipline to young people. Automatically, exposing young people onto the above way of conflict resolution may make them potential initiators of such behavior later in life. It is disheartening to note that this habit causes destructive effect on individuals and the whole society at large. Herein, corporal punishments do violate rights of human nature to physical veracity and, lastly, human self-esteem. Statistics According to survey, about 70% for the young people did found corporal punishment to be intolerable at neither school nor home. The pupils said that the practice is not good for emotional and physical and so it brings about fear to them, hence, reducing the concentration among them. Furthermore, 11% of the pupils did prefer corporal punishment when in discipline administration. Unfortunately, this was in favor by the low-incomers environment. In conclusion, corporal punishment is essential in the rectification of behavior, since this makes an individual think well. Critical thinking will ensure good decision-making and sound mind speaks. Although many learning institutions wish to put it into practice, parents and external bodies tent to put more of opposing nature (Anderson 89). It is well evident that teachers play a vital role in implementing good morals to children and so they should remain in that position. After all, no one will be happy to teach a rude student who strives to cause negatives to the person in his vicinity. Actually, the urge is to the opposing organization to try to think the future of the children they are trying to protect. There is a saying that if the rod is not in use, then the child will go astray. Correction does not come on one party alone, but the cooperation of the other party. That is, teachers and parents should embrace collective responsibility in shaping the character of the students. They should observe the slogan 'Together We Succeed.' Works Cited Anderson, Robert. The District school journal of the state of New York. New York, NY: Press of C. Van Benthuysen, 2009. Print. Graziano, Anthony and Linda Kunce. Effects of Corporal Punishment on Children. London: Violence Update, 2008. Print. Read More