Nobody downloaded yet

Science, not Dogma Should Be the Standard - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Instructor name Date Science, not Dogma Should be the Standard Those who claim a fundamentalist religious conviction do not accept the theory of evolution. This faction has challenged science since Charles Darwin published Origin of the Species in the mid-1800’s…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.2% of users find it useful
Science, not Dogma Should Be the Standard
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Science, not Dogma Should Be the Standard"

Download file to see previous pages Over the past century and one-half, however, people’s opinions regarding evolution have experienced an evolution. Many religious persons today acknowledge evolution to be valid. The Pope even admitted creation and evolution are compatible. Still, there are a dwindling numbers of people who choose to stubbornly reject the science and contend that magical account of life described in the Bible is the “gospel truth.” This emotion-charged dispute usually occurs when the fundamentalists object to science being taught in school. They want the creation version of events taught alongside the scientific version as a viable alternative. Eventually, everyone will acknowledge that the matter is not subject to dispute no more than the question of a flat earth vs. round earth is debated. Unfortunately, it will take generations to achieve this reasonable goal because our society evolves extremely slowly. Creationism is not based on the scientific model. No evidence exists, nothing to test or question. It is based on the belief that a supernatural being magically created the universe including all life in it. The faithful accept this version of events without question because if they did question it they likely would cease to believe it. Science is a journey for the truth. Hypothesis is formed from observation, testing and retesting. When new information is presented the original premise is altered. Science continually tries to disprove the hypothesis or theory until the conclusion is shown as credible and irrefutable based on all available evidence. Religion readily accepts the explanations of an ancient, very superstitious and uneducated people. “Religion is based on faith that is never questioned while science is based on knowledge that is constantly questioned” (Edwards, 1980). Creationist’s first line of attack is that evolution is just a “theory” therefore unproven and unacceptable when compared to the God’s unassailable holy words. Evolution is scientifically proven by the same method scientists prove other universally held theories. Gravity is a theory. No one knows precisely how or why gravity works but we all know it does, same with evolution. Creationists require a much higher standard of proof from evolutionists than they are willing to provide. Religious fundamentalists thought the earth was flat prior to the 16th Century. In fact, since the church controlled the government at that time it was considered heresy to publically disagree with that falsity, a crime punishable by torture and/or death. However, learned people including Christopher Columbus and Queen Isabella knew better. So did Aristotle who proved the earth was round 2000 years before Columbus. (Lienhard, 1998). Science was rejected then as now by the overtly religious but even they accept the scientific evidence regarding disease, that the Devil does not cause sickness. They also, because of science, realize the sun does not revolve around a flat earth as is described in the Bible. “There are still many points of major conflict between science and religion. In each case, only one will eventually win public support. The historical record indicates that religion wins very few of these disputes” (Robinson, 2003) Darwin theorized that species adapt and change over the duration of millions of years according to new environmental conditions. He called this process natural selection. Darwin observed and recorded ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Science, not Dogma Should Be the Standard Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Science, not Dogma Should Be the Standard Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1446156-writer-will-choose-the-topic
(Science, Not Dogma Should Be the Standard Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
Science, Not Dogma Should Be the Standard Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words. https://studentshare.org/english/1446156-writer-will-choose-the-topic.
“Science, Not Dogma Should Be the Standard Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/english/1446156-writer-will-choose-the-topic.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
Building Standard Oil Company
...?Terry Balabuch 4-13 M-W 10-12 Research Paper Building Standard Oil Company Building Standard Oil Company Rockefeller`s father was a peddler whoworked in many businesses and his mother was deeply religious. Born in 1839, he started as an assistant bookkeeper after graduating from high school at 16 for fifteen cents a day. Compared to today this would be about $10 a day. ( Goulder, 1972) Afterward Rockefeller was working several sales jobs and by age twenty-three had saved up four thousand dollars to invest in an oil refinery in Cleveland, Ohio, with a partner Samuel Andrews who attended the same church. Rockefeller paid attention to every aspect of his business, checking every detail to cut his costs, to...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
Standard of Beauty
...?Venakata charan kantumuchu and number 3 may Standard of Beauty To begin with, each of us have a different and definite perception of beauty and especially when it comes to women probably no two people would have the same view. I personally, however feel that a woman with beautiful hair and striking features like lovely eyes and sharp nose and beautiful rosy lips would be everyone’s favorite. But a woman’s navel no doubt would be the cynosure and bouncy breasts would leave no heads unturned. But if beauty has to be considered truly, then I would go with the soul beauty than the physical appearance. This outer look would diminish with time and wither at some point, but the internal beauty stays until one dies and also...
2 Pages(500 words)Book Report/Review
Evidence vs. Dogma
...Evidence vs. Dogma Following a lifetime of research, Charles Darwin introduced the theory of evolutionin the mid-1800 through his famous book Origin of the Species. Darwin’s scientifically sound conclusions were fervently denounced by religious leaders, as well as the vast majority of citizens at that time. Though more than a century and a half has passed, though a much more educated public has marveled at the wonders of scientific discoveries such as the combustion engine, the existence of dinosaurs, the atom, electronic gadgets and countless more, nearly half of American citizens refuse to acknowledge the science of biological evolution. They continue to advocate the Biblical version of events, that an...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Standard and Non-Standard English
...). Or upper-grade students read "'Please,' he begged, 'take some of the pain'" for "'Please,' he gasped, 'take some of the pain''" when reading Lois Lowry's The Giver (1993, p. 118). These miscues indicate that students have an intuitive sense of grammar that they draw upon as they read. In the second-grade example, students substituted nouns for nouns, and in the upper-grade example, they substituted a verb for a verb (Tompkins, 2005). Seeing the problems in non-standard English, a natural language framework, frequently referred to in the literature as "whole language," should be adapted. Learning to read in a first or second language is generally a matter of wanting to make sense of text. This is why...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Standard Deviation
..."A" and "B" is 5.44 and 5.57 respectively. It means asset "A" is less volatile or less risky than asset "B". It should be further noted that the expected profit or return from asset "A" is less than expected profit of asset "B" Now the question arises what will be the choice of a rational investor "X". Whether he will go to asset "A" or "B". Here standard deviation fails to answer. Because it only shows data variance from the mean (average data). But how this variance affect investor's choice is another matter. But Utility function explains the investor's behavior. The principle of expected utility maximization states that a rational decision maker or investor, when faced with a choice among a set...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
Standard Costing
...should exert efforts in developing industrial engineering standards on a timely basis. . III. Conclusion From the above-mentioned statements, it is fairly evident and noticeable that although standard costing may have it inappropriateness and unsuitability in some areas, the system has found its exact and perfect use in the advantage of organizations whose operations involve common or repetitive. The negative segment about standard costing discussed in this paper also helps the development of this paper. Specifically, the article authored by Baggaley not just portrays the setbacks of using standard costing but it also creates argument that brings...
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
Standard Alignment
...Standard Alignment The early education provided to us comprises of various s which help us build our foundation for a strong intellect. Of themany subjects, we have Language Arts and Maths taught to us during our early education. Both these subjects form a basis for developing understanding for many complex theories to come. In language arts, we are taught the basic language which in majority of cases is English. Language arts does not only emphasize on the correctness of the language we speak, but also teaches us the beauty of expressiveness through words. It also enhances the imagination and creation of a child by letting him compose any piece of work with words of his choice. Language arts mainly consisted of lessons...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Noise standard
...Comparison of OSHA Noise Standards and ACGIH Noise Exposure Recommendations Lecturer: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienist (ACGIH) is a not for profit member-based scientific association that advances occupational and environmental health. It is well known for publishing the Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) since 1946 then named as “Maximum Allowable Concentrations (MAC)”. They are guidelines for use of industrial hygienists in making decision regarding safe levels of exposure to various hazards including noise found in the workplace. ACGIH’s threshold limit values (TLVs) refer to sound pressure levels and durations of exposure that represent conditions under which it is believed that nearly all workers...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Daubert Standard
.... If a forensic psychologist is acting as an expert witness in a court room trial, he has to prove that his evidence and findings are in accordance to the 51% rule (Pyrek, 2007, p.345)). This means that the evidence provided has occurred 51% of the time it has been tested (Pyrek, 2007, p.345)). The Daubert standard states that the evidence should be reliable in nature; this means that the testimony provided by the expert witness should be obtained through a scientific method. According to the Supreme Court, an expert’s testimony is reliable if the scientific method used is testable, can be proved as false, and can be tested to be proved right or wrong. The testimony is even considered as...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment
Standard Deviation, Hypotheses, and Standard Error
...1) is taken and found its mean. If another sample is taken, the mean could be different. And if another sample is again taken, possible, the mean would be different again. It this example, the population mean may not be estimated by one or any of the sample means because of discrepancy, thus, the standard deviation of the 3 sample means is taken, which is now called the “standard error” (Myers and Well, 2003). From the example presented, if the sample size is 16, the error is 5, and if the sample is 100, the error is 2. It is seen that the greater the sample size, the lesser the error. In other words, as we take more samples, we are assured that we are estimating the population parameter closer to...
2 Pages(500 words)Statistics Project
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic Science, not Dogma Should Be the Standard for FREE!
Contact Us