Marriage remains condemned an unsuccessful social institution in the eyes of many Americans. Ever more, many Americans are marrying later in life, while another set chooses not to marry at all. Meanwhile, the rate of divorce floats almost at 50 percent for all fresh marriages…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Download file to see previous pages
Marriage remains condemned an unsuccessful social institution in the eyes of many Americans. Ever more, many Americans are marrying later in life, while another set chooses not to marry at all. Meanwhile, the rate of divorce floats almost at 50 percent for all fresh marriages. Out-of wedlock children are on a steady rise, more so particularly to the well-educated. Moreover, the long belief that the private, marital-based family entity can contentedly acknowledge major liability for the concern of children and other family appears more and more unsustainable.Meanwhile, marriage is not a rational foundation for social guidelines; however, it appears an expedient universal remedy to politicians and analysts debating the rate of divorce, the startling figures on children poverty. Some sociologists, like B. Graham, think that marriage control on love in America is not wrong. I agree with this assertion, since marriage is a very important institution, and everything needs to be done to rescue it. Even so, marriage as a social institute is failing; callous and castigatory actions formulated to make the status more firm and rigid are bizarre (Graham 2007). Policymakers are unwilling to see that a social trend, such as soaring divorce rate, is simply on module in panoply of pointers recording the pervasive and irreversible nature of the transformations that have taken place in all quarters of our communal lives. The Americans stand in the middle of important social change and it’s important that we recognize there is no unsophisticated past, no enduring utopian visualization to which the edict can return us. The American social goal should be to design doctrines that mirror the ways in which they are living their lives. Meanwhile, the Americans should subsidize and cater for the emerging family sets, such as single-mother families that are carrying out the all-important task of supporting children and other family members (Whitehead & Popenoe, 2007). Reinforcing marriage in America is going to take a key fundamental change in cultural values and social policy. No particular segment of society is accountable for the fall of marriage. Americans are all part and parcel of the problem, and consequently, they must discover the resolution. Americans must repossess the ultimate of marital durability and realize that out-of-wedlock childbearing does not really hurt. The American objective for the next age band should be to augment the percentage of kids who grow up with their two marital parents and diminish the percentage of those who do not. Feasible planning for recapturing a marriage tradition is dealt with and each key segment of society has to be informed (Schwartz & Scott, 2007). The corrosion of child welfare over the precedent decades is an American domestic catastrophe. Furthermore, when one ceases obsessing over it, the trend in numerous ways should be rather startling. Nobody could have even envisaged it thirty years ago. Currently, Americans are more affluent than ever before. Ever since 1960, the Gross Domestic Product has tripled a tenth fold prompting the average earnings of Americans to double. This success has openly benefited children. Americans are considering having fewer children and they are giving birth later in life, when the remunerations are higher. Furthermore, scores of additional mothers have gone into the labor force. It has become far worse-even much worse; this is simply a coincidence that child welfare deteriorated steadily during a period of time in which American marriage also declined. Current surveys have gathered information that children from broken homes, when they become young adults, have 3 to 4 times more behavioral and psychological challenges (Whitehead & Popenoe, 2007). A while ago, Americans were most likely the most marrying people in the world. The impact of that era can still be viewed in the older age bracket. In the fall of 1990s, 96 percent of women and 95 percent of men age 45 aged between 45 to 54 year
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
This is because its emphasis is placed on critical issues within a marriage such as family and economic background; this necessitates the need to evaluate the importance of arranged marriages as opposed to love marriages in saving and cleaning the mess associated with the institution of marriage.
The paper tells that love is an expression through actions that eventually create an environment suitable for nurturing a partnership between couples. These factors alone should be enough to prove that people should give more importance to the idea of love in marriages, and perhaps act according to this belief.
American Marriage and Family. It is irrefutable that economic unpredictability besides affecting other global sectors has not spared the American families, marriages and other love relationships. Specifically, this is evident from the information availed by Family Facts, Council on Contemporary Families and FRC websites found online.
xample, my brother and my sister in law did register and got a marriage certificate, but both our families still did not agree with them because they did not have a wedding banquet. My brother who works at a bank, and my sister in law who is a nurse, both are living in a society
Such arguments often treat love as an idealistic aspiration, fuelled by the media, and reason that the marital institution demands a firmer grounding than some vague notion of erotic attraction; Wexman, for instance, has noted that "Cultural historians generally agree that the emphasis on romantic love and association with marriage and personal fulfillment first took hold in the nineteenth century as part of the romantic cult of individualism" (1993: 12).
Too many individuals take advantage of this ease of entry and, unfortunately, leap into marriage before they look at the true implications of vowing to be together through sickness and health for many years. Hypnotized by music, mate and magic moment, or deluded into believing that marriage will make a drab life exciting, they blurt out, "I do," with little thought to the day when romance fades, as it must, when the honeymoon, in truth, is over.
ts, regardless of ceremony, to being subjected to church and state restrictions in order to control moral behaviour, resource allocations for “legal” beneficiaries, and so many other reasons.
Government involvement in the matrimonial issues began in the 16th century when it
accepted and carried out in all the cultures and religions around the world, there may be different perceptions of the societies on how important they think marriages are, and the form that they should be. Usually, the research has found out two types of marriages in which a
nd patterns of marriage across cultures and learned that lasting marriages happen when couples find happiness in their own ways, and not through any specific marriage formula (76). Two arranged marriages show opposite results in terms of happiness. In Their Eyes Were Watching
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Love,Marriage and Family"
with a personal 20% discount.