Download file to see previous pages...
Recognition of gay marriage will pave the way to truly equal and accepting society where all people share the same freedoms and get the opportunity to love, be loved and create a family regardless of their sexual orientation.
All arguments against gay marriage are ideological in their nature and they can be easily disapproved. According to Kellard, gay marriage does not threaten the institution of tradition marriage because not all traditional marriages are based on love. Many couples decide to marry in order to get money, social benefits or the access to healthcare. The rate of divorces in the USA tends to climb high and, obviously, it is not an indicator of a solid traditional marriage. Despite common beliefs that gay marriages are harmful for children, they serve as a better alternative to families where children have only one loving parent. Conservative religious beliefs does not apply to those who do not share them so it is not fare to take away freedom of love and religion from those who are granted to have it constitutionally (Kellard). Overall, there is no reason to think about gay marriage is something harmful and threatening; it is just a union of people who want to live together as a family.
Objections to same-sex marriages are usually expressed by extremely conservative people who reinterpret information and even lie in order to present the issue in negative light and persuade Americans that they will ruin everything by supporting gay marriage. For instance, Dana Loesch, who is a well-recognized columnist, often writes about lawsuits filed by gay couples against certain organization in different states. In her articles gay couples sue with people who deny taking photos of their wedding, baking a wedding cake or renting a pavilion for their marriage (cited in Lampo). However, according to Lampo, all these cases have nothing to
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The only recognized marriage type in the 2006 constitution was that between a man and woman. In fact, in the constitution Section 31, Article II, it was stated that the only recognizable marriage in the state is that between one woman and one man. This implies that the constitution does not only ban same-sex marriage but also polygamous marriages.
Moreover, many European countries do not legally accept same-sex marriages. However, few countries around the world consider same-sex marriages as constitutionally legal. Such countries including Portugal, South Africa, Canada, and Argentina are among the countries that allow gay marriages in their constitutions.
In what appears to be a slow acceptance and integration of these unions in to the mainstay society, many legal systems across the country have consented to their existence, citing protection of human rights and basic human freedoms as their main concern. Whereas this trend seems entrenched in the western world, most of the African, Asian, and Latin American states have openly abolished such marriages in their constitutions.
People from diverse disciplines have voiced their opinion on what should be the solution to this standoff. Basically, these solutions are founded on the two possible stances on the proposition- either in support or rejection of the Proposition. The proposed solutions have come with their pros and cons, as may be expected.
The justification for gay marriage and the understanding of gay people in relation to their personality, cognition, development and social interaction is presented in this paper in conjunction to various psychological theories. Motivation and behavior are linked to the hierarchy of needs as postulated by Maslow.
It mentioned substantial number of related studies, which concern constitutional amendments about same-sex marriage and pro-gay marriage policies, and mental health problems among gays, bisexuals, and lesbians. The authors satisfactorily provided a clear background on how policy-level interventions could cause psychological stress among gays, bisexuals, and lesbians, particularly in the U.S.
It has turned out to be the most socially divisive and ethically challengeable issue of the decade. The reason behind its controversial stature in society is that apart from upholding the right for freedom of choice and unconditional love, this issue paves the way for several alarming problems.
operly raised their children, which undermines the arguments of anti-gay marriage that gay couples raise children with poor self-esteem and gender identity issues. The primary issues of Obama’s support focused on equality and fairness in law. Indeed, if fairness is considered,
d difficult struggle for marriage equality concerning gay marriages to be recognized legally, which has been fruitful in many States; however, many people are still against gay marriages. In America there are over three million gay people living as couples who are supporting
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Pro Gay Marriage for FREE!