Analysis of the Source - Essay Example

Lowen particularly contends that the information provided therein is misleading and does not reflect the actual scenario on the ground. The authors present the Californian education sector grappling with innumerable complaints from the public. The public is generally furious because of the fact that the curriculum does not exhaustively address all the historical aspects of the American people. They feel that this is manipulative and has detrimental lasting implications on the holistic wellbeing of the population.

At this point in time, it cannot be disputed that the efforts that the authors have made in underscoring the contentious issue are immense. However, they have not been exhaustive and have provided minimal information about measures that can be undertaken to address the issue in a sustainable manner. The most important issue that the texts highlight pertains to the lack of inclusion of the historical background of the minorities in the education curriculum. The current texts place undue emphasis on the European culture and the weaknesses of the minority culture.

This is not reflective of the current cultural scenario on the ground. Undoubtedly, the effects of this exclusion can have far reaching implications on the holistic wellbeing of the minorities. . To a great extent, it also influences their decision making and related tendencies. The authors need to have clearly indicated that the need to align the curriculum to the expectations of the learners. This goes a long way in enhancing sustainability. An important issue is that the new educational framework demanded that the curriculum accurately portray the cultural and racial diversity of America’s society while emphasizing the “centrality of Western civilizations as the source of American political institutions, laws and ideology” (Reinhold, 26).

According to the two authors, History and Social Studies do not reflect the students’ origin and background, but it depicts that of America. Certainly, America, which has been represented by the European culture, is given an upper hand. Arguably, the European culture is considered superior to the culture of the minorities. This is irrespective of the fact that minorities comprise a higher percentage of the American population. The arguments provided by the authors would have been more insightful if this aspect was highlighted.

As indicated earlier, the books purport stereotypes and overt biases of minorities (Reinhold 27). This is ironical of the purpose of education whose role needs to center on promoting the positive attributes of the minority populations. The government in this regard should take practical steps to address the issue. In particular, minority populations need to be also well represented in the education sector. Sadly, authors of the books and their publishers are out to maximize their profits in the writing and publication of the books (Ehman 96).

The books are generally based on stereotypical