Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1442726-rhetorical-analysis-of-farm-girl
https://studentshare.org/english/1442726-rhetorical-analysis-of-farm-girl.
In her essay, “Farm Girl,” Jessica Hemaur uses the traditional rhetorical appeals of ethos, pathos, and logos to great effect in order to relay thetrials and triumphs of growing up on a farm. By building her argument that farm life develops character and responsibility while simultaneously calling on a person to go beyond the normal lifestyle expectations of youth, the author presents an engaging account of how, sometimes despite herself, she came to appreciate the experiences she had while growing up on a farm.
I read this story in order to discover the ways one writer draws on her personal experience in order to evoke a response in the reader. In this brief paper, I will discuss the ways Hemaur uses rhetoric to make her case. Hemaur utilizes an appeal to ethos in an especially strong way. Traditionally conceived as a way of letting the reader know the author’s qualifications in order to engender trust in the author’s conclusions, ethos is a means of presenting one’s qualifications through narrative.
Writing to a general audience that likely has not shared her specific farm experience, Hemaur must connect through common emotional reactions. Hemaur makes use of this appeal through a number of examples. First, she describes in solid detail the daily life of the farm experience. She tells of how her brother Nick would sometimes take the lead in organizing the most physical of the chores assigned to the four children in the Hemaur family, due to his age and strength, thereby immediately establishing her role not as leader of the group but as an individual who knows her role.
She also enumerates how she, along with her sisters, would sanitize the milk pails and consult the charts for milk production as they went about their chores of milking the cows on her family’s dairy farm (pp. 83-84). This use of detail lets the reader know that the family farm was a serious operation. Because their farm was both a business and lifestyle, the author suggests that the family had to do their work properly and in ways that were commercially viable. This lets the reader know that she knows what she is talking about, even as she was a child while performing the chores.
In fact, she later tells how her father expanded the family business due to the success they had achieved (p. 86), suggesting that they were a properly accredited and commercially successful farm. Second, the author ties this experience to her personal life, by describing how the experience made her more mature than others around her and different in quality and kind from her fellow classmates. By having described her role in the family farm as both responsible for certain chores, such as taking care of the younger calves (p. 84), and a good subordinate who was both willing to work for the family and willing to take her rightful place, the author presents herself as humble even as she blows her own horn.
Hemaur use pathos, a rhetorical strategy designed to appeal to emotional connections with the reader, through the use of concrete details. She admits that she initially hated getting out of her warm bed very early in the morning to go out into the bitter cold (p. 83). She tells how the rancid smell of the cows filled her basement as the children went downstairs to dress for work, but other smells, like the smell of a home-cooked breakfast, were warm and inviting to the family (p. 84). She describes the cutting cold of the wind and tells how the snow on the ground and the chill in the air made them move quickly through their chores.
These uses of sensory-driven details and honest assessments of their impacts evoke in the reader a connection to the author. Her use of pathos early in the story leads to an understanding of how the author gains the kind of experience that allows her to boast later of her maturity. By having worked through the difficulties of farm life, the author suggests, she was deserving of the kinds of applause she gets later from teachers and employers. In fact, she admits that she wasn’t always able to handle the lifestyle with success.
For example, she fell asleep in class. This duality of both calling on the reader’s empathy in seeing her struggle and admitting the tolls it took on her builds an appreciation for her story on the part of the reader. While there is less use of logos in the story than the other appeals, there are subtle references to it. Logos is an appeal to the logic of one’s argument. Hemaur doesn’t come out and state a logical case directly. Rather, she suggests that, by having gone through the trials she went through, she was naturally led to develop more maturity than her fellow students, who were simply tasked with being kids in suburbia.
Her logical argument is indirect, but persuasive nonetheless. She presents her case for her claim that farm girls are responsible and thriving individuals by offering examples from having lived the lifestyle. Through her use of ethos, pathos, and logos, Hemaur is able to build a solid case that farm girls are special. She argues that their experience naturally sets them apart and develops in them the character necessary to succeed. After having read the story, I can understand and appreciate her argument.
I agree that the more struggles one goes through, the more one is able to rise to challenges. I appreciated the story in its honest assessment of both Hemaur’s own role on her family farm and her life as a student. I thought her use of details and her structuring of the argument were effective. While in the end Hemaur seems to want to convince the reader that she, as a farm girl, is a successful human being as a result of those experiences, I thought that her humility and humanity were evident, even as she boasted.
Her tone was low-key and understanding, admitting both frailty and determination. Having read the story, I am inspired to view my own life experiences for their character-building qualities in a new light. The old saying that “what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger” is evident in every line of her story, and I am glad to have had the chance to share in her journey. Hemaur, J. (2008). Farm girl. In D. Roen, G. Glau, and B. Maid (Eds.), The Concise McGraw-Hill Guide: Writing for College, Writing for Life (pp. 83-87). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Read More