The Media Impact on the Arab Revolutions - Research Proposal Example

Therefore, the media has been a versatile tool in ensuring the success of the revolts; while on the other hand, the same media has been an accomplice in committing large scale atrocities to innocent people in cover up campaigns. A report by an anonymous reporter in BBC (2011) argues that in Bahrain, the dramatic events have occurred as the government tries to ban coverage of demonstrations and other media in pretence that such black coverage would reduce the demonstrations as there would be no information being passed to the public.

The government would also use such avenues to crush demonstrators with massive causalities occurring in such cases. The result has been that though the government has banned the coverage, more and more people feel that their independence was threatened and this leads them to the streets to demonstrate against the government. This has also been reported in Syria, Jordan and other Middle East regions. The increasing number of reporters and journalist being killed in the Middle east win a bid to cover up the government brutality has increased the rage and criticism to these regimes globally, a situation that has seen more and more people in the Diaspora supporting the revolution against these regimes (Anonymous, 2011).

Silencing the media is observed as silencing the voice of people or their rights to know, and this result to increased demonstrations against the government especially in Bahrain and Syria. In Bahrain however there are massive cover-up of the tortures and shedding the blood of popular majority that dare air their voice on reforms. The lack of convergence of interests in this case as Al-Amin (2011) argues means that since the western countries in most cases have no interests in Bahrain, the atrocities in this country goes unreported and the dismal regime along with an elite that has been robbing the country provide editorials and other cover-ups that do not reflect the truth.

On the same note as Al-Amin argues, in Syria due to the convergence of interests has also been able to continue with the atrocities against the citizens as nations watch. According to Al –Amin (2011) though Arab Gulf states have no qualified basis to give any lesson related to democracy, freedom and equality, they have been of late trying to hold many meetings in the media, to air their support in this country, as convergence of interests in the country mainly in the Oil industry persist.. This means that the media though used in other revolutions positively, has been used in Bahrain and Syria to cover up the atrocities, offering the regimes the life they need to expound their atrocities and ensure their survival.

The case of Libya was however different in that there were more interests from the western countries, a move that saw the western-lead NATO invading the country in pretest of ensuring democracy and freedom for the Libya regime. This we as viewed as convergence of interests among the NATO members as many of them had been robbing