We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Peter Singer and Garrett Hardin On Helping the Poor - Essay Example

Comments (0)
Summary
In reading the articles “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” by Peter Singer, and “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor”, by Garrett Hardin, it is impossible not to notice the overwhelming attention to the topic of world poverty and underdeveloped, impoverished nations…
Download full paper
GRAB THE BEST PAPER

Extract of sample
Peter Singer and Garrett Hardin On Helping the Poor

Download file to see previous pages... I find that both articles are very well written, and as previously stated, both make their point on their issues, though Singer does so in a more antagonistic, provoking manner, while Hardin seems to remain impartial while giving concrete examples to support his position. After reading these two articles, I find myself disagreeing wholeheartedly with Mr. Singer, on the basis that a nation should look within its own borders and fix the problems that plague it from within before even beginning to give aid to any other countries that may be in need. While I agree that there may be a moral obligation to provide aid and assistance, it should first be provided to those that reside within the borders of a given nation, before being provided elsewhere. Mr. Singer is fixated on a situation occurring in Bengal, while providing general evidence that nations capable of sending aid have not done enough to help. However, he fails to provide concrete, quantitative statistics on the nations that he is citing as able to provide aid to Bengal. There is no concrete evidence given to suggest what is happening within the nations that are able to provide aid, and no other examples other than criticism of those nations who choose to build luxury items rather than send aid. For example, Mr. Singer states that “Australia’s aid amounts to less than one-twelfth the cost of the Sydney’s new opera house.” He further states that Britain, another country able to give aid to Bengal, has “non-recoverable costs of the Anglo-French Concorde Project already in excess of ?275,000,000.” Yet he does not mention the per capita statistics of these two countries specifically, citing only that “they are able to give aid”. Mr. Singer also fails to mention that most large projects such as the opera house and transport systems are, inevitably, taxpayer funded over a long period of time. This in and of itself creates a vicious cycle which, again, Mr. Singer does not mention: higher taxes means less money in the pockets of the citizens, which means less to give to others. It seems as though Mr. Singer is trying to make people feel guilty for having luxuries while there are others that do not, which is hardly the basis for any moral argument that one should give money. Mr. Hardin, in fact, says this in another, perhaps more realistic way by stating “Some say they feel guilty about their good luck. My reply is simple: Get out and yield your place to others.” Just because one has the resources to share, does not mean that they should. It should be the choice of each and every person and/or country if they choose to share, or if they choose to use that money where it is most needed, which may well be within the borders of their own country. Another issue to look at is the fund that is being donated to. Mr. Singer mentions the Bengal Relief Fund. What proof do people have that the Bengal Relief Fund will actually get the money to actually assist others? In 2001, the World Food Program received notice that one million people in Zimbabwe would be “in urgent need of food aid within a month”; however, the government, after “holding out the begging bowl”, refused to allow anyone but themselves to distribute that food (LoBaido). The World Food Program would have no way of knowing if the goods that were donated actually made it to the people in need of aid, or ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
Peter Singer: Charity and Duty
The title of the essay is an unambiguous ‘signpost,’ and makes the subject of the piece, and its purpose, self-evident. It is a rousing call to awaken the conscience of the affluent, and make them accept famine relief as a moral duty. Singer makes a well-reasoned argument against “the present division between acts of duty and acts of charity” (9) which prevail in contemporary Western society.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Moral Journeys Philosophy Essay
Garrett Hardin’s article “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case against Helping the Poor” presents solid argument against helping the poor. In author’s view, generosity towards the underprivileged nations is an ethical misconception. The arguments Hardin provides can be grouped in three categories: metaphors, utilitarian, and relativist arguments.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Environment and Population: Philosophical Considerations
There are many differences in our age between different countries and each country has its own problems, but all human activities are reflected in their food and environment. In the book Ultimate Resource II (1996) written by Simon it is evident that the problem of food abundance overweighs a problem of food absence.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
PR Functions
Although different brands of peanut butter, detergent, bottled water, analgesics, and cough remedies do not have unique benefits, they often have quite different market shares. Apple Computer Company is a leading consumer electronics company. Apple uses PR relations to maintain strong relations with potential customers and inform about coming innovations and growth opportunities.
5 Pages(1250 words)Case Study
Peter singer and john arthur
Extending the argument further Singer says that if a child were drowning and there were many people around standing and watching, it would
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
Peter singer
His works have had the most prominent impacts on public opinions unmatched by the works of any other philosopher to date. Singer is an avid supporter
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Peter Singer
e highly acclaimed philosopher and educator from Princeton University had been taking bullets for his much controversial stand regarding issues that are quite sensitive to the prickly society. He had authored several high- profile writings that had critics question his
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Population environment debate
On the other hand are those who state otherwise and believe that increase in population is not the reason for decrease in resources. This writing will focus one the impact that environment has experienced due to
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Garret Hardin Lifeboat Ethics: The case against helping people
He states that it is not the responsibility of the wealthy nations to help and assist the poor nations. To explain why wealthy nations should not assist the poor nations he uses the example of a life boat and compares it to a wealthy
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Garrett Hardin: The Case Against Helping the Poor
The author states that Hardin criticizes the ‘spaceship metaphor’ which seeks to assert that every individual on earth has an equal right to an equal share of the available resources. He claims that the ‘lifeboat metaphor,’ with its emphasis on limited capacity, and necessary adherence to the margin of safety, more accurately depicts the situation.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Let us find you another Essay on topic Peter Singer and Garrett Hardin On Helping the Poor for FREE!
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us