Grammar is a language that is mostly misunderstood especially in the teaching field. The misconception comes in with the different ways in which different people view grammar. Grammar is mostly is viewed as a collection of several arbitrary rules that are normally about various linguistic static structures (Rodney and Pullum 388)…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Download file to see previous pages
The structures are not to be taught to the learners, they will acquire them on their own and if they are to be taught then the lessons are expected to be boring. They will be boring because the students will be required to repeat the different models in grammar (Chomsky, 136). Such teaching activities can be boring. This makes it more questionable. However there are different approaches that are communicative and proficiency based that limit the grammar instructions. There are several grammar claims that should be called grammar myths. There is a myth about split infinitives. You might have heard people saying that you are not supposed to use split infinitives. It is one of the many grammar myths that have been contradicting people for quite a long time. It all started with the Latin writers. (Bryan, 270)
How the myth of split infinitives began
Not to split infinitives is a notion that is mistaken. Latin was a, model in good writing in the 1800s and different writers tried to make English fit in Latin language. The attempt was unrealistic since the Latin infinitive is always one word and there is no way that it can be split. On the contrary, the infinitive has to be split in the English language (House, 54). No matter how awkward and unattractive the split infinitive is, it is never wrong to use them. There is nothing desirable about split infinitives, but according to H.W Fowler he says that when it comes to real ambiguity, then split infinitives are quite useful (Fowler, 768) .Always feel free to use the split infinitives whenever necessary even when it is a clumsy version. An example of a sentence with a split infinitive is…” We wanted to immediately leave for the airport”…. This splits an infinitive and is definitely not the right one to use. The other example is “The committee plans to legally ban franc disclosures” (LaRocque 61) .This sentence makes it clear that it is necessary to use a split infinitive. A split infinitive A split infinitive is a word that comes in between the particle “to and the verb. An example of a split infinitive word is “to go boldly” (Wardhaugh 69) it might seem wrong but then it is not. Split infinitives have been a great controversy among the teachers and the grammar people, but the notion that it is a grammatical myth is a mistake. Henry Fowler the writer of the book Modern English Usage stated that these as superstitions .It is a superstition that has never been legit and different English writers have always been splitting the infinitives ever since the 1300s. The blame has always been put on Henry Alford a Latinist and used to be the Dean of Canterbury in the 19th century. Alford published a book, A Plea for the Queen’s English in 1864 where he declared that “To” was an inseparable infinitive. He probably was influenced by the Latin grammar that infinitive is one word and it can never be split. Like you should not put the word,” Boldly” between an infinitive phrases “To go-as in “to boldly go’. This was false. (Alford 171) In the early 20th century the highly respected English writers Henry Fowler, George 0.Curme and many more started explaining that the split infinitive is preferable and accepted. Besides it is hard to split an infinitive, since the particle “To” is simply a prepositional marker and not part of the infinitive. At times it s never needed. An example like “She helped me to read” the particle ‘To’ can be dropped. But then because of the grammar myths that still live on, then it becomes difficult for one to drop it. That could explain why it is still in use and considered grammatically correct (Harris, Bruce
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
This partition of powers allows for both the autarky and the impressive power play of the judiciary. This paper discusses four myths regarding the US Court Systems which is composed of various autonomous courts. Myth 1: Myth of Double Jeopardy The first myth is regarding the criminal justice system which under the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution states that no person shall “be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.” (Balko, 2011) This safeguard, also known as ‘double jeopardy’ according to popular belief deters the Courts from retrying the same person over and over for the same crime, until s/he gets a conviction.
This research tells that most people are aware that autism can't be cured, but unfortunately, some snake oil salesmen seem determined to indicate “cures” for autism. Autism is a lifelong behavioral and developmental disorder, something like Down's or inherited bipolar disorders or schizophrenia. The question is not a comprehensive cure that solves all the symptoms, but treatment.
Huddleston states that it is important to distinguish two levels at which our grammatical categories need to be defined. They are: the language particular level and the general level. Both of them help to learn a language and distinguish the difference either between various parts of speech or languages.
Myths can as well be used to explain other things such as the customs or behavior of certain group of people or even explain the nature. Through told stories, myths helped to teach human beings behaviors that enabled them to live well with fellow human beings.
Until this class I had not appreciated the various forms of writing style and as such did not master grammar usage. Because my work is somewhat reactionary, writing was always a prerequisite to all of my course work and I always lost points for using improper grammar.
Although the myths follow distinctive storylines, many of the themes included in the Babylonian, Egyptian and Greek creation myths are similar and indicative of the cultural setting of the civilizations where the myths originated.
Despite the geographical separation, there are several themes and elements that are common among the three creation myths.
Today more than ever before, the view held by students regarding grammar is decidedly negative for two main reasons.
The first reason students today have a negative attitude towards grammar is that it appears to be antiquated.
Filipe Montero is perplexed by the nature of his assignment in the sense that the contents of the generals memoirs seemed to contradict time and its essence. Montero’s relationship with Aura, who is Consuelo’s niece, is the focus of the author’s plot in the
The society’s cultural myths convey the religious and shared experience. It also explains society’s belonging, practical and moral lessons. Myths fall into different categories. Furthermore, different societies give and
Late entrants in the market can attain success if they offer differentiated products and meet the customer preference demands (Stonehouse & Houston, 2012).
2. The second statement states that, to be successful you have to be cheaper. The second statement is a business myth
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Myths about Grammar"
with a personal 20% discount.