Analysis of Feynmans Physicist Richard Feynman - Essay Example

Thus, repeated experiences of teaching different topics and observing lectures and sessions being taken emphasized the understanding within the Physicist that the general notion of understanding among the teacher-to-be was that the meaning of learning something was only to memorize it word by word, knowing every single definition by heart. But the core understanding of any of those things was unimportant to them. The absence of actual understanding led to the inability of the students to relate the physics concepts to practical situations.

Certain words or ideas that appear frequently are ‘learn’, ‘meaning’ etc. The physicist is trying to emphasize that knowing something is not merely memorizing it but requires concepts to be understood from practical perspectives especially when it comes to physics. The most important binary that the author sets up is mentioning the Brazilian teachers-to-be to the mainstream system of the country itself. Another important binary that the physicist mentions are that of mentioning the US government officials is as naive as the Brazilians who were unaware of the deficiency in their system.

As the officials fail to realize the essence of Robert’s analysis he considers the US officials to be educated in a similar superficial manner to which the Brazilians are being educated. I think the text sarcastically points out the general nature of the Brazilian people. If it is the matter of learning Physics that is dealt with such superficially then it must be the same with all the other subjects and even official state-related matters. This is because the officials that would eventually come out of such a learning system would not let any such peers survive who may be learned enough to raise.

This paper approves that about the topic of the essay Feynman believes that it was very clearly deceiving. He was alarmed to realize that Brazilian personnel who were being trained as teachers were hardly aware of the core concepts of practical Physics and had only learned word-to-word the exact text in the books instead of ever realizing the meaning of that text. The absence of actual understanding led to the inability of the students to relate the physics concepts to practical situations. This essay concludes that if it is the matter of learning Physics that is dealt with such superficially then it must be the same with all the other subjects and even official state-related matters.

This is because the officials that would eventually come out of such a learning system would not let any such peers survive who may be learned enough to raise points of objection upon their modes of conduct. Since the entire Brazilian system is the result of a single educational system running throughout the country, it would behave just as similar to the larger majority of students who would suppress any others who would like to raise questions during lectures. They would refer to this question-raising action as a deviation from learning not only for the student itself but also for all those others around him.

So, the text may seem to be entirely about knowing things not as merely as learning them superficially, but in reality, it was a critical analysis of the perspective of the people of Brazil and especially the higher-ups of the system of the state.