We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

The Truth about the U.S. Involvement in the Vietnam War - Research Paper Example

Comments (0)
Summary
It is the contention of this paper that the Vietnam War was agreeable or unavoidable for exactly the rationales that U.S. leaders during that moment claimed it was, that is, to sustain the trustworthiness and integrity of the pledge of Washington to restrain communism across the globe. …
Download full paper
GRAB THE BEST PAPER

Extract of sample
The Truth about the U.S. Involvement in the Vietnam War

Download file to see previous pages... The ideologies of Marxism-Leninism provided Mao Zedong, Brezhnev, Khrushchev, Stalin, Ho a shared goal in pursuing revolutionary changes all over the world. Hence, the Cold War was “a world war… in which the future governance of the international system was at stake, and in which the great powers opposing the United States and its allies were the moral equivalent of Nazi Germany” (Moore & Turner 2002, 440). The war in Vietnam actually started because the USSR did not attempt to provoke the United States. Yet, in the less developed countries (LDCs), Moscow could hide its operations and still carry out its plans. The fame of Ho as a fervent supporter of independence, alongside Mao’s eagerness to support him, established Vietnam as an especially advantageous chance (Moore & Turner 2002). Therefore, this was a conflict that the Americans could barely have prevented, that is, to have stayed detached would have created a major pro-USSR repositioning in global politics.
It is the argument of this paper that the Vietnam War is justified, yet it was dealt with in wrongly. Lyndon Johnson relied greatly on military commanders whose tactic of finding out and annihilating adversaries, rather than guaranteeing the safety of civilians, generated more fatalities than outcomes. As an obvious result, support from the Congress and the general public has weakened. Broadening the disagreement would simply have made everything more unpleasant, as, current Chinese documents reveal, Mao planned to get involved (Capps 1991). The sole possible option was for the Americans to give up the war, as stated by Jennings (2010), so as to sustain the American national political agreement in support of the Cold War. Triumph was not the issue. What was required was an attempt to prove that the Americans would protect and support its allies in the developing world, to guarantee prospective targets of the expansionist mission of Moscow that the U.S. would not leave them. However by persisting with the conflict until a total disintegration of national determination and a mortifying departure, the governments of Nixon and Ford promoted Soviet antagonism throughout the latter part of the 1970s (Neu 2005), a development repealed when Reagan reinstated the nation to a policy of rendering its dedications trustworthy once more. It is a well-known fact today that Ho, Mao, and Stalin rendezvous in 1950 in Moscow to formulate the line of attack for an ultimate occupation of Indochina (Jennings 2010). It is known that North Vietnam has better or larger support from China and USSR than assumed beforehand: the anti-aircraft squads of Russia in fact attacked American soldiers in Vietnam, and it was documented that there were roughly 170,000 combatants of China on its area (Moore & Turner 2002). It is known that the North Vietnamese were not at all actually solemn about an agreed resolution, and that their allegedly independent Viet Cong friends were actually their dummies. It has been recounted that South Vietnamese and Americans had no control over the exercise of bloodshed (Jennings 2010): The North Vietnamese were simply as awful, and the Khmer Rouge were obviously much more dreadful. Nevertheless, some historians failed to explain why the integrity of the United States ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
U.S. Involvement in Vietnam War
U.S. Involvement in Vietnam War Herring focuses on the American side of the war, but still gives a comprehensive outlook of Vietnam. He portrays the main reason of America’s involvement in Vietnam to be anticommunist tendencies. America’s cold war policy was the main cause of progressive and escalated involvement in Vietnam.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Vietnam War
Understanding this reality is a critical facet of foreign policy. The conflict in Iraq (2003-2010) proved that this important lesson was not sufficiently learned following the U.S. involvement in Vietnam. If this lesson continues to not be fully understood or is ignored in the future the U.S.
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper
The Vietnam War
Vietnam War, like many other wars of its era, was fought to prevent the spread of Communism across Asia. Usually referred to as the Second Indochina War, Vietnam War was the longest military battle in the history of United States and lasted from 1959 to 1975. It was fought between the North Vietnam (Communist) and South Vietnam (United States).
9 Pages(2250 words)Research Paper
The role of the media in Vietnam: the television and the war news
The most notable experience was the stories about the Fall of Saigon and the unification of the Vietnam country. Prior to all these, there was a lot of war stories of what happened in Vietnam.
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
The Vietnam War and America's Involvement
The Vietnam War (1954–1975) originated in the nationalist struggle against French colonialism. This independence movement was led by Ho Chi Minh, who formed the Vietnam Revolutionary League (Vietminh). In 1940, with France’s surrender to the Axis Powers in World War II, Japan occupied Vietnam.
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper
How journalists influenced US war efforts in Vietnam
Uniqueness of the war also relates to the defeat that US forces encountered in the battleground. In the history of the world, USA has never lost any battle as it happened during the Vietnamese war. The Vietnam War was typically a local matter that saw South and North go to war.
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper
Critical Thinking about the Viet Nam Conflict
Where did the consensus come from? Most people with this viewpoint weren’t there. The Pentagon seldom put a negative spin on the conflict and the protesters were in college, not
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper
Vietnam war
enter of Vietnam War is to date considered as the Battler of Khe Sanh.This is the historic bloody point of Vietnam War that marked the turning point of United States foreign policy and handed the communist North Vietnam a win over the south (OBrien 67). A summary analysis of
2 Pages(500 words)Research Paper
Vietnam War
In battle with indistinct enemies and unusual battle lines, the number of dead bodies and figures turned out as revealing signs of triumph. The Battle of the Khe Sanh is never
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper
Vietnam war
While united States claim withdrawing as a way of changing their fighting tactics, the North seems to have outsmarted them (Rottman 67-9). The particular of scene of Battler of Khe Sanh underscores the epicenter of the war and gives the insight into the true picture of
1 Pages(250 words)Research Paper
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic The Truth about the U.S. Involvement in the Vietnam War for FREE!
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us