The Vietnam War became one of the painful moments in the history of the United States. Between 1965 and 1975, the war in Vietnam was one of the most contentious issues of American domestic and international politics…
Download file to see previous pages...
From unanimous support, the American public gradually moved to complete rejection of the U.S.’s involvement in Vietnam. Simultaneously, political scholars and the common public tried to discover the main causes of the U.S.’s intervention in Vietnam. The current state of political science offers multiple explanations to the U.S.’s decision to intervene Vietnam. From political to economic and international relations explanations, public opinions of the Vietnam War vary across individuals and countries. More often than not, the Vietnam War is believed to be the sign of the U.S.’s power arrogance, although it is possible to assume that the Vietnam War also resulted from the domestic bureaucracy and balance of power concerns in America during the Cold War. That the Vietnam War remains one of the most controversial aspects of American history cannot be denied. Much has been written and said about the causes and consequences of the Vietnam War. More often than not, the Vietnam War is claimed to be a result of the U.S.’s power arrogance. In other words, the United States used its intervention to Vietnam to reaffirm its political and military superiority and used the Vietnam War to achieve its political objectives. However, the relevance of other interpretations cannot be disregarded. The U.S. embroiled in Vietnam because (a) domestic bureaucracy misinterpreted the seriousness of the political situation in Vietnam and (b) the rapid expansion of communism in the Vietnamese territories shifted the balance of power in the international political arena. All these interpretations have their strengths and deficiencies and all of them deserve professional attention. The arrogance of power is one of the most common explanations of the Vietnam War. Put simply, the Vietnam War is believed to be the sign of the U.S.’s striving to reestablish its military and political superiority in the East Asian region. The arrogance of power philosophy implies that, as the biggest and most powerful nation in the world, America wanted to use its power by all possible means and at every possible opportunity (Anonymous 126). Actually, the arrogance of power word combination was borrowed from the speech delivered by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman J. William Fulbright, who warned the Senate that the U.S.’s embroilment in Vietnam would result in the escalation of violence in China (Anonymous 126). In his speech Fulbright expressed doubts as for whether the United States was able and willing to overcome arrogance of power that had weakened and destroyed earlier nations and people (Anonymous 126). In Fulbright’s view, the U.S.’s involvement in Vietnam meant that the country and its leaders could distinguish power from virtue and, instead, believed that its superiority and power were but a product of God’s favor (Anonymous 126). The arrogance of power interpretation of the U.S.’s embroilment in Vietnam suggests that, throughout its history, the United States existed in the atmosphere of an ongoing conflict between Puritanism and democracy and, at times of heightened emotions, Puritanism would break through and border on unreasonable moralism (Lobe). As a result, arrogant in its power, the United States would view its military operations as a quest for morality, freedom and democracy – the philosophy that has continuously guided all American operations until present. Despite the growing amount of evidence supporting this view, this interpretation is not without weaknesses. The main criticism relates to the relationship between arrogance and the beginning of the Vietnam War. On the one hand, at the heart of American intervention was more than one
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The rebel forces were able to overcome the French in the initial stages of the conflict. Consequently, the two parties opted to settle the conflict via an accord. However, the American government failed to recognize the pact. Therefore, the American government took over the conflict in Vietnam.
United we stand apart we fall, and this is evident in our setting as though not everything is in respect to what occurred, but the idea of the monuments is refreshes memories of then and enables one to put him /herself in the veterans shoes the changes they would have implemented and where they would have corrected in their aim to set a better living society.
These steps were actually the logical continuation of an earlier American commitment being made by previous administrations; thus, having addressed the audience at John Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, on April 7, 1965, Johnson made his point – “We are there because we have a promise to keep.
According to a survey almost 60 to 70 % students face bullying during career. School bullying can have a negative effect on the minds of the students from start to end of their lives. Discrimination on the basis of race and sex not only divides individual personality but it can also destroy overall image or culture of society.
The Vietnam War has hazy motivations at best:an abstract worry about a governmental change in countries on the other side of the planet,summed up by the American leadership as the "domino theory" - the idea that if one country became Communist,so would the next,and the next,until the whole world was run by what Americans saw as the oppression of socialism.
It has been three decades since America's war in Vietnam ended with the Paris Agreement and Protocols on Ending the War and Restoring the Peace in Vietnam.
By the terms of the deal, over 150,000 North Vietnamese troops remained in the South, whereas the United States, over the course of Nixon's presidency, had unilaterally withdrawn over 500,000 of its own troops.
Role of domestic concerns in us withdrawal from vietnam
This investigation evaluates the extent to which the domestic factors played their role in shaping the US foreign policy. This target will be achieved through finding answers to the following questions.
It may have been these murky beginnings that made the war such an unpopular one, and a topic that enervated rather than energized the American public. It may have been this lack of unity regarding the Vietnam conflict that offended President Johnson, who sought to turn the conflict around and make it a positive factor in American society.
be the exception: both of those conflicts featured enemies that sought world conquest, and the horrible plans that Adolf Hitler had for those who were not of Aryan descent, and particularly those of Jewish descent, made a military attempt to stop those plans a moral imperative
It seems natural that the best way for man and beast is to work together in a collaborative fashion. This seems to promote a more equitable balance for both species. In Alice Walkers Essay, "Am I Blue?" she
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Why Did the US Become Embroiled in Vietnam for FREE!