Kindergarten Playground for Orphaned Children - Example

Kindergarten Playground Project Name: Tutor: Course: Date: Executive Summary Kindergarten playground project is primarily established to meet the physical and emotional needs of children between the ages of two and seven who have no parents. The project is to be established in a 0.5 acre Kindergarten school in West dale, Birmingham. The kindergarten is to meet the physiological, emotional and homecare needs of the children. The project will provide a play needs after class work. The project is aimed at establishing skits, swings, rolls and toys for play needs. The project will be accepted if secure, quality and comfortable to children. The outputs expected are grass, trees, swings, play toys, rollers and skits. The project will not include extension of class rooms or offering various play types. It will also not include the play tools for children over eight years of age since their needs will have changed at advancing age. The project will take one month, using the physical and human resources costing not more than $3000. It is assumed that the project will not overrun its costs, time and the staff of the kindergarten will cooperate. The school is willing to maintain the grass lawns and young trees. In developing a project breakdown, the project will use of Gantt chart software and a universal technique of project work disintegration is by use of Work Breakdown Structure (WBS). The structure deliberates on project scope analysis where the project is evaluated according to its deliverables or outcomes (Hillson, & Webster, 2004). This technique of breakdown does not infer any sequence or logical dependencies. The Gantt chart and the PERT charts are not appropriate tools for undertaking such analysis. In contrast, PRINCE2 being a Project Management Methodology, is the best in analyzing the project with regard to deliverables. Table of Contents Table of Contents 3 Kindergarten Playground Project Proposal 4 Preliminary Risk Assessment 6 Project scope and Work breakdown structure 7 Cost and budget for Kindergarten Planning Project 8 PERT/CPM Analysis of kindergarten planning project 10 Kindergarten Project Scheduling and Planning 12 Conclusion 14 References 15 Kindergarten Playground Project Proposal Title: Kindergarten playground for orphaned children Description: Kindergarten playground project is primarily established to meet the physical and emotional needs of children between the ages of two and seven who have no parents. The project is to be established in a 0.5 acre Kindergarten school in West dale, Birmingham. The kindergarten is to meet the physiological, emotional and homecare needs of the children. The project will provide a play needs after class work. The project is aimed at establishing skits, swings, rolls and toys for play needs. The project will be accepted if secure, quality and comfortable to children (Thieraus et al, 2009). The outputs expected are grass, trees, swings, play toys, rollers and skits. The project will not include extension of class rooms or offering various play types. It will also not include the play tools for children over eight years of age since their needs will have changed at advancing age. The project will take one month, using the physical and human resources costing not more than $3000. It is assumed that the project will not overrun its costs, time and the staff of the kindergarten will cooperate (Carly, 2004). The school is willing to maintain the grass lawns and young trees. Resources and personnel: The project will require human and material resources to be completed successfully. The materials needed are wooden planks, carpentry tools, metal bars and sheets, grass and tree seedlings. The project will require personnel skilled in outdoor design with years of experience (Milosevic, 2001). The selection of these resources will be based on quality of desired outputs and cost of the project. The project will contract the services carpenters, masons and lawn designers. Relationship to the project: The kindergarten playground project is of community interest and also a hobby. It has been my wish to extend my philanthropic work to orphans and this is an opportunity to ensure the orphaned children growth and development is well founded. Play is important to children as is food, shelter and care. Project aims: The Kindergarten playground project is to meet the play needs of orphaned children. It will also provide emotional and environmental fulfillment through planting few trees and grass at the playground. To occupy the daily programs of children with play as a way of enhancing their physical and mental growth. Project Selection Model: The project will be implemented upon undertaking a preliminary feasibility study based on; location, finance, technical, and the sustainability. The model is results based meaning that the output is more important. Location feasibility is important to find out the appropriate part of the schools compound that best suits the playground. Financial feasibility will consider the cost of buying materials and paying the personnel. The amount of finance $3000 is sufficient for the project given the materials costs and wages determined. Technical feasibility will be done to bring about the technical aspect of the project like the specification of the swings, glides, and quality of grass. Sustainability feasibility is establish that the project will bring about lasting effects to the children and the school. Cost Benefits The cost of play toys and carpentry materials Strong and formidable playground structures suited for children and can last up to 40 years Cost of hiring a lawn designer, transportation and ground breaking The children will find the playground exciting and comforting. They will also learn and experience among themselves the essence of play and community Cost of paying the workers and planting grass and trees. The school will have reduced cases of child injuries and accidents owing to use of non-conventional play materials Preliminary Risk Assessment The risks to the Kindergarten playground project will be described in the table below; Risk Impact Frequency of occurrence Early mitigation measures Ownership Long-term measures Delay in delivery of construction materials High Low Provide a list of requirements in time Sue Enlist the services of procurement consultants Changes in time schedule Medium Medium Crash the project Jackson Adjust the schedule to allow for a one week delay Injuries caused by carpentry tools High Medium Provide first aid kits Drew Provide protective tools to the users Project objective: To construct a Kindergarten playground for children between two and five years within a month in a half an acre field. The method used to support the selection of the projects is based on needs assessment. Children need play and preliminary findings showed that the Westdale orphan Kindergarten had no playground. The children have also been using a section of the pavement to play football which is risky due to passing vehicles. Project scope and Work breakdown structure Scope: The project will meet the homecare and physical needs of orphaned children. The project will provide a play needs after class work. The project is aimed at establishing skits, swings, rolls and toys for play needs. The project will be accepted if secure, quality and comfortable to children. The outputs expected are grass, trees, swings, play toys, rollers and skits. The project will not include extension of class rooms or offering various play types (Kerzner, 2004). It will also not include the play tools for children over eight years of age since their needs will have changed at advancing age. The project will take one month, using the physical and human resources costing not more than $3000. It is assumed that the project will not overrun its costs, time and the staff of the kindergarten will cooperate. The school is willing to maintain the grass lawns and young trees (Mooz, PMP, & Cotterman, 2007). Figure 1: WBS: Kindergarten Playground Planning Benefits: The direct beneficiaries will be the orphan children. The school will also benefit from increased participation of children in their class work owing to adequate play (Palmer, 2009). The children will also grow and develop well which is a noble desire by the department of children. Teachers will also have easier time handling and leading the children (Charvat, 2005). Cost and budget for Kindergarten Planning Project The needed tasks to complete the deliverable for the work package, kindergarten planning, are being planned and expected to be completed by 15 November 2013 and use 30days of work (Wysocki, & McGary, 2005). The following tables indicate the progress of the required tasks (Lientz, & Rea, 2001). Table 1: Cost Variance Kindergarten Planning Name of Task Cost (Total) Baseline Variance Actual Remaining Kindergarten Planning $2,988.00 $3100.00 $112.00 $0.00 $3000.00 Play toys $1587.00 $1635.00 $48.00 $0.00 $0.00 Wages $307.00 $357.00 $50.00 $0.00 $0.00 Transportation $508.00 $508.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Ground preparation $300.00 $3,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Lawn design $286.00 $3000.00 $14.00 $0.00 $0.00 Table 2: Work Variance for Kindergarten Planning Task Name Work Baseline Variance Actual Remaining % Completed Work Kindergarten planning 30 days 32 days 2 days 31days 30 days 100% Play toys 8days 9 days -1 days 8 days 1 days 100% Wages 1 days 2 days 1days 2 days 0 days 100% Transportation 12 days 17 days 5 days 18 days 13 days 95% Ground preparation 13days 12 days 1 days 12 days 11 days 96% Trees and fences 5days 4 days 1 days 0 days 1days 100% Table 3: Schedule Variance for Kindergarten Planning Task Name Start Finish Late Start Late Finish Slack (Free) Slack (Total) Play toys 3/12 5/3 3/12 5/21 11.83 days 11.83 days Wages 3/12 3/23 3/12 3/23 0 days 0 days Transportation 3/26 3/30 3/26 3/30 0 days 0 days Ground preparation 4/2 4/11 4/2 4/27 0 days 11.83 days Trees and fences 4/11 5/1 4/27 5/17 0 days 11.83 days Play toys 5/1 5/3 5/17 5/21 11.83 days 11.83 days The bottom bar of the tracking Gantt chart depicts the planned schedule for the tasks (PMI, 2007). The top bar indicates the actual performance and the percent complete for the tasks. Figure 1: Gantt chart tracking of Kindergarten Planning PERT/CPM Analysis of kindergarten planning project In PERT/CPM analysis, three estimates are used namely; optimistic time denoted by (o), most likely time denoted by (m), pessimistic time denoted by (p). It provides a basis for establishing project variance and mean for each activity in the kindergarten planning (ICPMA, 2002). The activity is given by mean (Mean) = (o + 4m + p)/6; while its variance is; activity (Variance) = ((p - o)/6)2. The value obtained is the z-value which establishes the duration of the project in percentages (Mathis, 2009). Table 3: Activity Variances and Mean Times ID Activity Optimistic time (days) Most likely (days) Pessimistic (days) A Play toys 8 9 13 B Transportation 12 14 16 C Ground preparation 13 14 16 D Trees and fences 5 7 8 E Play toys 8 10 14 Expected completion time Activity Expected completion time(days) Variance (days) Play toys 7 -0.2 Wages 1 0.2 Transportation 13 0 Ground preparation 12 -1 Trees and fences 5.4 0.3 Variance is -0.7 days Activity ES LS EF LF Slack Critical path 1 Play toys 0 0 8 8 0 Yes 2 Wages 1 1 2 2 0 Yes 3 Transportation 7 12 14 18 5 4 Ground preparation 9 9 13 13 0 Yes 5 Trees and fences 5 7 15 15 0 Yes Critical path is 1-2-4-5; the expected kindergarten completion time is 33 days. The kindergarten completion time is 33 days with a variance of -0.7. This considers p Read More