Major differences between NEC3 & JCT SBC 2011 - Coursework Example

Major differences between NEC3 & JCT SBC 2011 Introduction The NEC3 and JCT SBC 2011 are forms of contracts. The NEC3 contracts are applicable in any industry while the latter form of contract is concerned with the enhancement of proper management of building constructions. In the case of the building construction projects, the impact of adoption of the JCT SBC 2011 contract is evaluated. The major tasks of the project manager and the administration staff for the project are identified. Comparison of NEC3 and JCT SBC 2011ccontracts According to Chappell (2013, 23), this form of contract was established in 2005 while JCT SBT 2011 was 2011. The contract is famous and has been endorsed by many parties, including the institute of civil engineers while the other contract is applicable in complex construction projects. Additionally, the government of the United Kingdom abandoned the updating of its GC contracts in order to endorse the NEC3 contracts. The application of the contract entails the entry of both parties to the contract in consensus. The terms and conditions of the contract must be fully understood by both parties to the contract. Additionally, the terminology applied in NEC3 contract must also be understood by the contract parties. The contract requires the integration of CDP with other suitable designs in order to achieve congruency in the project. This has won the contract support from the public and the private sectors across the world. Mosey (2009, 56) asserts that the contract also incorporates some sub-contracts including the professional service short contract. The sub-contract was initiated as a derivative of the Association for project management. The sub-contract enhanced the application of the NEC3 contract. The contract also takes into account the construction Act amendments. This contract managed to deliver an integrated procurement remedy for the industry. In this regard, the contract encompasses works, supplies and construction services. However, NEC3 usually required expertise in order to apply in any firm. This implies that there must be thorough project management in order for the contract to apply. 1. Price The price of the NEC3 contract is usually higher because it is adjustable because of the contingency activities unlike in the case of the JCT SBC 2011 contract. The company should progress at a reliable pace rather than overspending of contract. The application of the NEC3 contract must be done with due diligence in order to avoid variability in the project. 2. Provisional sum The provisional sum for the JCT SBC 2011 contract is not mandatory like the case of NEC3 contract. The project manager is usually at pains to decide whether to adopt the discrepancies manifest in cost estimation for a project. The variations negate the principle of cost control in NEC3 contracts. The variations also compromise the control of overall project cost. Moreover, the costs associated with compensation events are separate from the initial tender price. 3. Cost scrutiny The cost scrutiny should be made mandatory for both contracts because this allows easy cost evaluation. The large number of firms usually involved in a single mega construction contract requires long-supply chains. This implies that the identification of the costs involved is hectic. Consequently, cost accounting for the project takes a long time. The administration of cost pertaining to the company system increases the overall contract price. Adjudication of the contract cases is mandatory. 4. Ground risk The ground risk for the JCT SBC 2011 is higher than in the case of NEC3 contract. Caution should be taken with regard to the productivity and improvement in performance of the contract projects. Project management should be emphasized in the application of NEC3 contract. 5. The program In both cases, a comprehensive program must be prepared prior to the start of the project. The contract should focus on the contingence events rather than the past. Programming for the contract is essential. This requires detailed information pertaining to the legal contract terms and conditions. The contract ought to be collaborative because of its inclusivity and documentation of time and huge money savings. The contract initiator must ensure the project results in high savings. The contract also involves drawings, which define the appropriate bills to be used in the project. The scope of work must be outlined in the contract. The complexity of the project task must also be highlighted in order to give employees easy time for preparation. 6. Payment The payment for the contractors should be prompt in both contracts in order to motivate the project managers. However, the costs should be negligible to avoid costing complications. The cost involving compensation events should not cause problems regarding the adoption of a policy to cater for factory contingent overhead costs. The overhead cost should be absorbed to reduce overtime and production of goods for auxiliary purposes. 7. Extension of time/loss of expense The extension of time is assured in the case of NEC3 contracts, but the exercise is hard in the case of the JCT SBC 2011 contract. The NEC3 contract should be adopted in most contracts because it is not restricted to complex contracts. New procedures ought to be put into consideration before the sealing of the contract. The contract should only apply in many fields, including games given that the contract is forward thinking. The JCT SBC contract involves the generation of many initial paper reports on the viability of the project to be done while the NEC3 contract does not involve the voluminous report generation. In this regard, it emphasizes on form rather than substance of the project. 8. Insurance Insurance for the contractor should be ensued to reduce mitigation costs in case of unexpected variations. The replacement of an administrator by a project manager should be done through compensation of events in NEC3 and JCT SBT 2011 contract. There should be quantity surveyors, to ensure the adherence to the pre-set contract conditions. 9. Design Risk Design risk is more common in NEC3 than in JCT SBC contract projects. The contractor should be responsible for the designing of the complex parts of the project. Moreover, the project should be carried out in phases. The project activities should comply with the contract rules and regulations. Additionally, there should be a division of labor in order to hold specific employees accountable for failures. The NEC3 contract applies to multiple contracts while the JCT SBC contract is applicable in mega projects, especially where detailed contract provisions are mandatory. The contract also applies in the definition of quantity and quality of work accomplished. Conclusion Both NEC3 and JCT SBC 2011 contracts are crucial in the construction and other forms of projects. The contracts differ in various ways. The mode of contract applicable to each contract is different. The NEC3 contract covers a wide range of contracts while the JCT SBC 2011 contract only covers the complex contracts. The contract has a correlation with the conventional methods. The projects using this contract must hold the employer responsible for the process of designing. The design is then presented to the contractor for the sole purpose of consistence. The architect is responsible for the informing of the contractor of the contract design. The SBC contracts have the provision of contractor’s designed portion. This is only applicable when the contractor accounts for the design of particular sections of the project task. The employer should provide specifications of the contract in order to enhance accuracy in the budgeting and tendering process. Recommendation 1. The administration of the contract should be carried out by an architect and the project tasks ought to be accomplished in bits. 2. The contractor should have the leeway to make a revised insolvency subject to contract termination. 3. The specialist update of the contract should apply to all versions of the SBC contract given that the provisions help an employer to identify specific specialists in the contract. 4. The adjustments made in the updates ought to be implemented through amending the legal contract document. 5. The incorporation of the amendments should be made through attachment of the update unto the specific contract, which involves the insertion of provisions relating to the modification. 6. The contractor must reserve the right to reject any specialist replacement made because this scenario also applies in case of post-naming. 7. There should be an allowance for an extension of time in the event of delay caused by insolence of a specialist. 8. There must be quantification of work prior to the start of the project to enhance proper budgeting for the human resource. This will also ensure that the variation is eliminated at this stage. Reference list Chappell, D. (2013), Building contract claims. Hoboken, N.J. : Wiley. Clamp, H, Cox, S, and Lupton, S. (2007), Which contract? : choosing the appropriate building contract. London : RIBA Publishing. Lupton, S. (2011), Guide to the JCT Standard Building Contract, London RIBA Publishing. Mosey, D. (2009), Early Contractor Involvement in Building Procurement : Contracts, Partnering and Project Management. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Ross, A. and Williams, P. (2012), Financial Management in Construction Contracting. Chicester: Wiley. Read More