Languages, Political Oppression and Loss of Cultural Identity - Essay Example

500 hundred languages are spoken by less than 100 speakers; another 1500 languages are spoken by less than 1000 speakers. Most languages will survive in the next decades. Such disappearances are galvanized into action in the increasingly vocal campaigns to preserve linguistic diversity. When a language dies we lose the possibility of a unique way of describing and perceiving the world.

The effect of homogenizing monoculture upon the ways of life, the pop ham was afraid of the spread of English by the American culture; it was delivered by Japanese technology and the hegemony of a few notable transactional languages. David a linguist echoed the sentiments last year. We care about the dying languages which reduce the diversity of the planets.

Vanishing voices, Daniel and Suzanne, link preserving languages to the campaign for fundamental human rights and protection of minority groups which are regarded as aggressive cultural imperialism and globalization, they argue in a benchmark in cultural diversity. Death of languages is symptomatic cultural death a way life disappears.
The point of any language is to enable communication, the translator Miguel Leon and renowned Mexican historians have put it that to survive, a language must have a functional language spoken by a few or a hundred, which is not a language. Enriching to learn other languages and delve into other cultures, but it is not because different cultures and languages are unique. Making the contact barriers between culture and languages allows room for the expansion of horizons and becomes more universal (Lyons, 148).

The human capacity of any language shapes the way of thinking, most linguists have long given ideas about people's perception of the world, and the concepts they hold. French speakers view the universe differently from English speakers; they speak French which is absurd. Biological notions of racial differences have fallen into disfavor, as a result, of the experience of the Holocaust and Nazism. Racial science has discredited racial thinking. It has been expressed in cultural rather than biological terms. The reason why Eyak will soon be extinct is not that Marie smith was denied her rights, it is just because no one wants to speak, and is also capable of speaking the language. This might be frustrating for professional linguistics and not a question about rights (Lyons, 160).
Languages also confuse political oppression and loss of cultural identity, various groups such as Turkish Kurds are banned from using their language for a campaign by the state, and they deny their rights. There is nothing authentic about local ways of life; nobody can suppose that it is more beneficial to be a member of French nationality. Read More