Analysis of Freire's educational theory - Essay Example

In this case, the teacher fails to recognize the cognitive ability of students instead transforming them into passive learners. He writes that education suffers from narration sickness because teachers talk about the realities as if they were predictable and motionless. Teachers fill the students’ minds with the content that is outside reality thus shifting the focus of education to sonority of words instead of the transformation power. He argues that students mechanically memorize content while their teacher is the narrator of it.

My current educational system is related to John Dewey’s educational theory that suggests dialogue between the learner and the instructor. This factor changes education theme and makes it an act of depositing. According to his theory, this system introduces the banking concept of education whereby knowledge is a gift that the knowledgeable bestow upon those that they consider unknowledgeable. He compares the alienation that results from the teacher-student relationship to the slaves found within Higelian dialectic; and the students never get to discover that they also educate the teacher (Piere 73).

My educational system which relates to John Dewey allows interaction with the nature through experimentation and research. The dialectic or libertarian education, as he writes, lays its drive towards the reconciliation of the poles of contradiction to ensure that both parties are simultaneously teachers and students. My educational system undergoes constant evaluation process, which aims at providing the learner with corrective measures. This type of education creates dialogue between the teacher and the student such that they are able to learn from each other and benefit.

He adds that such a solution is impossible with the banking concept which tends to maintain and even stimulate such a contradiction through attitudes like those that the teacher teaches, and the students taught, or the teacher is the subject of any learning exercise while the students remain to be objects (Piere 75). He argues that the banking education’s capability to have the creative power of students annulled or minimized then stimulates their credulity which serves the oppressor’s interest.

The oppressors utilize their humanitarianism in some profitable situation. He adds that the oppressors have an interest of having the consciousness of the oppressed changed. He mentions the oppressed as those that live just within the society and according to it. He writes that all who use the banking approach do not perceive that some contradiction about reality already exists within the deposits - a factor that may lead the students to domesticate reality later. Freire writes that something implicit within the banking concept is its assumption of the existence of some dichotomy between the human kind and the world, a concept that views an individual to be a mere spectator (Piere 78).

The view does also not make any distinction between access to consciousness and entrance to consciousness. He writes that the banking concept creates a distinction between the two stages of an educator’s action. Freire’s education theory is gender insensitive. It considers males as beings who are manageable and able to adapt as compared to females who do not possess these characteristics. The oppressors, according to Freire, are concerned with banking information to student’s minds making them passive learners.

The outcome of what they learn is transformed into