Cognitive Theory, Primeval Concept, Lexical and Typical Concepts - Essay Example

The assumption is that prior happenings add considerably to understanding a lesson. The last assumption is that the memory of a person determines the transmission of the knowledge process (Mitchell& Myles, 2004, 303). Concepts related to cognitive theories include primeval concepts, lexical and typical concepts.

The videos watched involved a teacher and students evaluating various hypotheses and the way they relate to learning. They had to address the various ways in which learning tremendously depends on one’s memory and the connections of reasoning (Ortega, 2009, 304). They explained that the manners of students were the least contributor to learning. This is because students’ manners may have several factors facilitating them. The other activity that students indulged in was the identification of things read in previous lessons. Remembering was essential, in that the teacher related it to the assumption that memory was vital in learning. The other activity was trying to define concepts emanating from cognitive theory. This was through evaluating the primeval way in which memory was required in learning.

3) Assumptions from the video
- Memory plays a part in learning

- Prior encounters determining a lesson
4)
Memory assumption was widely exemplified in the video. This was through the study of a person’s brain blocks concerning education. The study involved the handling of memory as an education prerequisite. For example, asking the students to remember previous lessons, this was about the primeval theory. The fact that they could retain information reflected the way intellect programming determines learning. Those students who did not recall the way the previous lessons were did not proceed well in the lesson. Learning contributes to one’s wits composure and the way one could advance their remembrance.

The assumption that previous encounters contributed to the present lesson was also explored. The students who handled issues similar to the lesson contributed a lot to the answer. This is because they were already recognizable to the lesson running. Those students who heard the lesson for the first lesson took time to relate matters. Therefore, the teacher got a leeway of explaining the assumption with ease. This is because she asked the students about encounters that they had. The encounters played the greatest role in setting the lesson.

5)
The response of the students was an explanation of the cognitive hypotheses. For example, the fact that they answered questions asked by the teacher showed that they were listening. Answering questions meant that the mind processed the questions asked. Answering questions explained the way cognitive speculation stemmed from the mind (Mitchell & Myles, 2004, 303). On the contrary, students who were not attentive did not answer questions well. This is because their common sense did not process what the teacher asked. The teacher had a hard time addressing students who did not understand the lesson. When she picked on a student that was not attentive, the student encountered a hard time answering questions. This is because the mind did not have a stockpile of any information that she said. It is because of this that such students could not retrieve any information from their brains. When the teacher gave instructions to the students, the response was different from the students. This is because those students who were attentive had their intellect set for the instructions asked. This explained the cognitive theory that identifies the fact that learning was a matter of one’s mind.


Alternative ways of teaching the video content would include sampling the students into group discussions to research on their own. This would be an alternative way because the students would have to use their wits to think about the questions asked. Discussions are an element of cognitive conjecture because students share what is in their brainpower. Therefore, learning through discussions enables someone to use their memory about encounters they have had before.

The other way would be using students in other grades to teach students in session. This is because students who had been taught the lesson would be aware of what expectations of the topic. Using continued students to teach would be an example of cognitive conjecture. This is because the students would have to use their memory to memorize about teachings given to them. Memory meant that they would indulge their brain in teaching students. Cognitive assumption means that the brain is the chief contributor to learning. The behavior of students is not something to go by concerning learning. Read More