Evolution of Olympic Games - Essay Example

Running head: Olympic Games Introduction The Olympics started in the ancient Greece almost 2,000 years down the line. It was rejuvenated in the early 19th century and it is now among the world’s prominent sporting competitions and a source of living to many people in the world. The games used to be held every four years since 8th century B.C to the 4th century A.D in the municipality of Olympia, which is situated in the western Peloponnese peninsula. It was done in honor of the god Zeus. The first modern Olympics to be held was way back in the year 1896, which took place in Athens. It comprised of 300 participants from 14 nations. They were competing in 43 events. As from the year 1994, the Olympics of summer and winter have been done separately and have been alternated after every two years. The Olympic Games were closely related to the religious festivals of the cult of the Zeus. It was not the Integral part of the right. Indeed, they had a unique behavior and their aim was to show the physical qualities and the tremendous performance of the young generation. In addition, it was aimed at fostering good relations between the cities in Greece. According to the views of the specialists, the games had vital importance to the religion and owed them their purity. The Olympic Games are the sole and complex scheme, and its extent, range and complexity are like no other. Therefore, following this reason, for a town to host a fruitful Olympic games, many years of keen and precise planning is required, with all the relevant authorities, organizations and stakeholders working in unity together. Many games are played in the Olympics. These games include Rugby, athletics, Badminton, Judo, Olympic, Swimming, Boxing, Table tennis and many others. Evolution of Olympic Games In the Beginning The beginning of the Olympic games is buried deep in the ancient times. Historical records show that a weird Olympic was played in Egypt 3,000 years ago and Ethiopia it was played 1000 BC. Several museums give evidence of this event played in Greeks and Romans. In South Africa, history states that Olympic was played in Aztec Indians before Columbus landed in the new universe. The current game of Olympic advanced in England in the early 18th century. It evolved mainly in the schools of England. The first competition done for Olympic for men was in 1908 games in London Olympics, in England. Ireland, Scotland and England were the main competitors. Olympic had many controversies since it was started. After appearing for the first time in 1908, it was subsequently dropped in the 1912 event. It then appeared in 1920, in Antwerp Olympics. Again, the Paris organizers omitted Olympic in 1924 claiming that the event had no international confederation. Olympics had made its primary steps on the way to the International Federation when in 1909, the Olympic organization in England and the Belgium Olympic organization decided to jointly recognize each other to control international Olympic relations (Tania, et al 2008). The French organization followed soon after, but this was not considered enough. The IOF is Born Olympic took its mainly significant step forward in 1924 when the International Olympic Federation, the globe governing body for the game, was founded in Paris under the scheme of Frenchman, Paul Léautey. Mr. Léautey was motivated to the games achievements after it was omitted in the 1924 games in Paris. He eventually became the president of IOF. He held a meeting where he united representatives from seven National federations where they formed the International governing body. These countries included Belgium, Switzerland, Spain, Hungary, France, Czechoslovakia, and Austria. They represented both men and women in their countries. Women join in the Fun In 1927, the women’s events developed rapidly in several countries. Women came together to form the International Federation of Women’s Olympic Associations (IFWHA). The subsequent were the nuisance members of this association, Wales, United States, South Africa, Scotland, Ireland, England, Denmark and Australia. After having a great celebration in their respective golden Jubilees- the IFWHA in 1980 and the IOF in 1924 the two associations came together to form the IOF in the year 1982. The development of the International Olympic Federation from its untimely beginnings has been mainly impressive. Many countries joined in the following order, Denmark in 1925, the Dutch country in 1926, Turkey men in 1927, and in 1928 – Amsterdam Olympics year- India, Portugal, Poland and Germany joined. The membership of the first non- European country was marked by India’s addition. 50 countries had already joined the IOF by 1964, and three continental organizations were also affiliated with IOF. These are Asia, Africa, and Pan America. In total were 71 members. At present, the International Olympic Federation has five continental organizations- apart from the three Oceania and Europe has added a total of 127-member organization. Today and Beyond Today, the IOF president together with the Honorary secretary General with the extended efforts of eight committees, Executive board, the professional staff and three advisory panels are working together to fulfill the heights of Olympic sports and games. At the end of the day, the tasks of the International Olympic Federation will be accomplished. Their headquarters is situated in Lausanne. In diverse ways, the IOF serves as the guardian of the Olympic sport. With the efforts of both the continental and national organizations, the Olympic game is consistent and unified around the globe. The FIH does not only regulate the event but more so it is responsible for its promotion and development to guarantee a safe future for Olympic. Significance of Olympic game to the local community Any Olympic fan can confirm to the fact that there is a lot to guzzle when following the event. Through diverse channels, professional sports present a selection of products reflecting the wants and pleasures of their fans. Sport has constantly been a subject of deep social importance. In current society there are few persons who do not, directly or indirectly, meet elements of games in their everyday social lives. Some may be keenly involved directly as participants in some sporting activity (Paul, et al 2011). Others can be spectators at the sporting grounds or check on the events through the mass media. Some may be volunteers of referees, coaching or executive members of the sporting association. Above all, there is a population that is not interested with the sporting activities. However, even the persons who are not interested with games as also find that sporting in some manner is part of their living. Regular occurrences like the sport-oriented conversations at families and working environment or the sports news in the media or even through the enthusiasm demonstrated by other people about the main occurrences like the Olympic Games, the World cup of soccer, or the playoffs of the Stanley cup. Therefore, sporting has some influence on the lives of individuals either directly or indirectly throughout the world obviously, Olympic has deep influence on the lives of the majority of people in this globe, whether we like it or not. It is little shock, then, that this event has turned out to be a multi-billion dollar trade whereby highly valued and highly trained perticipants run after a puck around a potentially priceless enlargement spot. Where Olympic was once principally a thing of passion and of personal patronage and whose major source of revenue was its entry receipts, it currently serves as a coherent plan of capital assumption and accumulation. Olympics is a commodity, and that fact should be clear to everybody. However, there is a rampant belief that sport is so exclusive that it should be set separately from regular commodities as the cell phones or the automobiles. While the border between these two forms of commodities is relatively permeable, there has been a relatively conflicting basis for maintaining a critical separation. Constantly, the standard infuriated fan and spectator suppresses the vital fact that the Olympic players (particularly skilled Olympic players) have market influence, but they do not manage the ventures accountable for the commercialization that has besieged Olympic in the universe. This disgust at the thought of business contaminating the otherwise ‘pure’ globe of cultural existence stands as an important ideological counterpoint to present trends in the states end user cultures, and one that possibly must be celebrated. Without a doubt, this time around, the shut out is generating stronger disapproval of the idea of Olympic-as-business and team owners’ hunger than in the ancient times. However, not often does this appraisal surface in any mindful manner as broader community criticism of main league sport and the diligence of pro sports. Popular disapproval of the game is almost in no way viewed as explicitly ‘political’ and is not often extended to include a broader appraisal of present patterns of economic buildup and the commercial and state polices that maintain them. Olympic players from those new in the sport to those who are skilled or professionals stand for the foundation of the whole field of sport. They are the steam engine of the game economy. They create command for coaches and trainers, they are customers of manufactured sporting merchandise, and they make use of the sporting facilities. High-performance Olympic players attract public to the stadium for part-time or qualified sport events and their performances are put out on TV. They are the greatest promoters of the sport in the globe. Greater strength in sport means more strength in the manufacturing of sporting facilities and goods. In addition, high profile Olympic players are promoters of sporting products at residence and ambassadors for sporting businesses overseas. Instead, they are a great deal more likely to be draped in melancholy and mingled with the language of individualized consumer revolt. Today’s obvious greed and fraud are contrasted to the ‘fine old days,’ a legendary time when holders were sports inhabitants first and entrepreneurs next, and when skilled franchises were more intensely fastened in their dwelling communities and players were merely happy just to participate in the game(Patricia, et al 2013). Yet this stress on the rights and requirements of personal consumers is itself, component of the monetary and ideological conditions that are upholding the present trends and disagreements in the sports industry. Popular formation of the ‘fine old days’ classically celebrates the main leagues and their ‘traditions.’ Nevertheless, the popular building of tradition here is likely to be extremely selective and the tinted images frequently tell us little about the varying political-economic demands and limits that allowed the growth of sports cartels and concerning their position in the establishment of national and continental well-liked cultures. In the absence of a sufficient past and political-economic study, it is hard to distinguish what is new about the present NHL shutout and what is principally an addition of older fiscal and cultural patterns and tendencies. It is yet harder to imagine of how sport might give out as an extra organizing point for opposition to the broader pressures and restrictions determining life. Professional Olympic players can be condemned for various failings, even for their assumed yearn for high and high salaries. But in a culture dominated by trade and economics, it appears churlish to rebuke them for the reason that, they accept a high earnings for the chance of their playing ability and all but voracious demand by the fans for skilled sporting events. Sports markets in the universe’s most marketable economies are less than wholly competitive. Governments allow leagues and skilled sports teams to work outside the anti-trust decrees and accord them extreme tax breaks. Sports fans who imagine that skilled sports like Olympic events have become grimy should press governments to apply completely and thoroughly the anti-trust laws and civic responsibilities to all skilled sports. Full realization of the anti-trust laws would eradicate obstacles to entry and raise the number of Olympic participants and contests and the enforcement of game public responsibilities would bring back tax dollars to significant – if not vital – local community programs. A more fundamental proposition would be to eliminate profit from sport in general. Since the sport is in several ways is an essential part of culture, and communities add extremely to the development of the Olympic Games and amenities that pro-leagues utilize, games should be the possession of the community. Organizations structured along non-profit and income-sharing lines would go a long method to send back and give a boost to sports at all levels, amongst, and across genders. Government strategies of building and constructing public sporting amenities around the nation would revitalize corporal education and individual well-being. Such a system would demand a stern evaluation of entrepreneurial ideology, not only relating to the Olympic events, but in relation to monetary and political power, something that everyone knows to be extremely desired these days. How Olympic has improved the social conditions, Olympic event has improved the social conditions and well-being of many persons interested in the event. Many participants have become successful in their life endeavors following their participation in this event. Quick decision-making is a significant expertise that the game of Olympic teaches an individual (Joe, 2008). Even though not all decisions are reasonable, an individual needs to be capable of think fast and take action to the situation at hand. Quick decision-making is not all the time the paramount solution for the crisis, but this is a significant life proficiency to have in order to solve diverse problems in life events. The significance of sacrifice is a skill that several people may lack or ignore in their daily lives. In Olympic, two forms of sacrifice take place. Sacrificing ones physical body and chucking checks is an essential skill that every Olympic participant should be ready to do. Olympic is corporal sport that calls for the use of physical energy. When an individual has decided to take part in any Olympic game, he should sacrifice his body many times and this will bring forth a positive impact on the flow of the game. On the other hand, an individual may be left with many cuts, bruises and headaches. Participants that reject to sacrifice their body could have prejudiced a game a lot and thus lower the general capacity of the event. The second form of sacrifice is psychological and connected to being a group perticipant. If a player on the squad is not ready to surpass the puck, then it is openly hurting the team members. If that team was going to be unbeaten, the individual all desired to sacrifice that one bad angled attempt for a bypass to a colleague who had a better chance to score. Sacrifice is not just something that occurs in Olympic (James, et al 2009). Even in school, sacrifice should be applied in that one should sleep late in the night and other parties in order to focus on the main agenda that leads to him or her succeeding in education. Therefore, Olympic Games teach people on the importance of sacrifice for a better life in the future. In life, individuals come across scores of people and Olympic Games assists someone recognize that dealing with people can be rather tricky. If a person deals with circumstances in a peaceful and collective way, one can achieve almost everything. Many people take part in Olympics with their friends and each have diverse reasons as to why he is playing. Olympics, therefore, assists an individual mold the understanding that one may not like his colleague very much but has to make the best out of such a situation. This applies to many other situations that individuals meet in their lives. If you will be able to make a relationship plausible, then the surrounding that you are in will be a positive one. Many people usually find it difficult to associate with their bosses at work. Olympic experience assists one to get along with all diverse kinds of people. The role of Olympic event in the towns / villages / cities Since the development of this event, it has led to a tremendous growth of towns and cities. This is brought about by the construction of arenas and sports grounds that create job opportunities and social cities to citizens in diverse states. In the process of preparing the Olympic event in towns and cities, as a whole they will gain contemporary infrastructure, new transportation systems, modernized commerce structure, current hotels, an amplify in energy capability, thousands and thousands kilometers of gas pipes, new cleaning facilities as well as telecommunications, digital TVs and fiber optic communication (David, 2012). All these advancements bring a greater change to cities, towns and villages. The role of sponsorship or public funding in the delivery of Olympic Government participation in sport procedure is a current phenomenon, having arisen chiefly in the post-World War II age Sport action itself has been ordinary in most countries of the earth for countless centuries. In fact, the Olympic sports competition can be traced back more than 1500 years. Governments around the globe have proposed various good reasons for their participation in Olympic competition. First is the customary physical culture prominence in the Peoples state of China. Following this is a more current 1971 Ping Pong Diplomacy of Russia aimed at building the nation in the post revolution era. Moreover, Japan’s promotion of sport has been directed to the armed forces and security objectives of the sport and corporal training in several countries and the foreign policy allegations of attaining sport superiority as a satisfactory way of dealing with individual difference, to the hosting of main international games as a way of developing countrys road and rail networks. The regional/territorial governments offer funding to regional/territorial sport associations; they support and endorse sport growth through regional championships and regional games as well as by preparing teams to take part in the Olympic Games. These governments furthermore develop amenities and offer direct support to Olympic participants. The differing roles and responsibilities of the central and regional/territorial governments are quite well defined and uphold through regular conversation among executives and at the political level. Local governments take chief responsibility for facility growth and maintenance. Municipal sport departments take part in providing lively living plans through managing and organization community game activities (Barnhill, 2008). Hence, governments take a greater role of making sure that the Olympic games in their respective countries are represented in the world competitions. Sustainable development of Olympic event The Olympic-organizing commissions sees its aim in the maximum use of chances, created by the Olympic project to make sure that enduring sustainable development affluence of a Olympic game all over the world. Economic success through the accomplishment of the Olympic scheme is considered to be rising the career marketplace, helping steady economic growth and in the growth and expansion of cities as sports centers in the provincial and international levels. Striving to succeed in the activities set in the context of staging and the preparation of the Olympic sports; these should be taken into account. I. Make sure that the principal use of local and regional labor resources are up to the required standards II. Materials components, equipments, and implementing the games quality management program considering the establishment of additional social and financial opportunities at provincial and international levels. III. Creating new career opportunities in the field of Olympics, IV. Training and developing local labor resources, V. constructing recent sports venues and maintaining them for long term use, VI. Development of recent infrastructure and service areas to pick up the value of life and generosity of the fans and the participants of Olympic Infrastructures and other venues, which are being created because of Olympic event, will become the most important Olympic legacy not only for the cities hosting them but also for the entire universe as a whole. Reference List Barnhill, A. (2008). Old Pucksters and Their Playmates: ... Playing Olympic Just for Fun. USA, NJ: AuthorHouse. Lynne Rienner Publishers. David, B. (2012). The Sports Hall of Fame Encyclopedia: Baseball, Basketball, Football, Olympic, Soccer, Volume 1. United Kingdom, UK: Hachett Livre Publisher. James, R., & Wilbur, C.R. (2009). Governing Middle-sized Cities: Studies in Mayoral Leadership. New York, NY: Joe, G. (2008). Special Events: Event Leadership for a New World. United Kingdom, UK: Penguin Books. John, G. (2010). Herb Brooks: The Inside Story of a Olympic Mastermind. United Kingdom, UK: John Wiley & Sons. Patricia, C., & James, C. (2013). Desiring Canada: CBC Contests, Olympic Violence and Other Stately Pleasures. United Kingdom, UK: Pan Macmillan Publisher. Paul, M.P., Janet,P., Jerome, Q., & Lucie, T. (2011). Contemporary Sport Management. USA, NJ: Human Kinetics. Tania, G.C., Robyn, L.J., & Paul, P. (2008). Understanding Sports Coaching: The Social, Cultural and Pedagogical Foundations of Coaching Practice. United Kingdom, UK: Oxford University Press. Todd, H. (2013). The Culture of Digital Fighting Games: Performance and Practice. New York, NY: Routledge. Vassil, G. (2012). Handbook of the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games: Volume One : Making the Games. United Kingdom, UK: Simon & Schuster Publishers. Read More

 

Read More