Download file to see previous pages...
ing and scanning the environment, coaching people working under him, making regular input in the work of subordinates, and managing activities (Hackman & Wageman, 2005).
Transactional theory argues that a leader should have power and formal position which is used to control, reward, and punish employees. Leadership is seen as a give and take between leader and his subordinates.
This theory calls for a leader to make sure that employees are motivated enough to perform at their highest potential. Transformational theory is focused more on understanding employees and treating them with respect in order to achieve good results. This theory does not see leadership as merely a transaction between two parties but much more than that.
This theory argues that a leader’s job is to make an environment that is feasible for work and in which employees are able to work together like a well oiled machine. A leader works to develop this environment and then the rest is done by employees.
Contingency theory takes on a different view and argues that effective leadership is heavily dependent on factors like environment and technology (Woodward, 1958). A good leader has to evaluate the environment and make decisions accordingly. According to this theory, there is no set outline that a good leader can follow instead he or she has to decide differently on a case by case basis.
The theory that best outlines effective leadership in an organization is the transformational leadership theory. This theory calls for motivating employees and giving them power and independence. This theory gives importance to subordinates and views them as assets. This is why transformational theory of leadership is the best and can help foster effective leadership in an
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The aim is to create an individual leadership portfolio from which it would be possible to reflect on my professional and personal growth by integrating the two theories, models and practices. The focus would be to identify and highlight the different leadership qualities and the basis on which they can be classified as per the leadership styles.
Introduction Both primary and secondary search for a definition to leadership would result in many different definitions being put forward by different scholars and people, depending on the direction from which a person may be viewing leadership from. This is to say that there is no one clear-cut definition of who is leader is or what leadership is.
With time, other timelines gave rise to subsequent theories that analysts could use to determine leadership. They are level of skills and situational factors. These enabled analysts to elaborate on not only leadership theories and roles, but also distinguish between real time leaders and mere followers.
A good leader will be able to lead his team from planning to achieving, thereby reaching the organizational goals.
The "One Best way of Leadership" is a highly debated and exhaustively discussed topic. The jury is still out on deciding which exact style may work universally.
Leaders who understand the Servant style are more concerned with the need for leadership and the needs of their employees rather than their own ego. This paper will discuss Servant Leadership in comparison to other leadership style.
Organizations are changing so rapidly in this day and age that one can barely go to work and not expect some change.
This allows them to influence their followers extensively. A number of theories have been established to shade light on various approaches to leadership. Sheldon (2010) revealed that personal traits, values, principles, goals, skills
rait form of management is focused on the distinctiveness of several influential’s – both doing well and unproductive and is used to foresee management efficacy in many organizations found in the world. (Ackerman 1997). Therefore, successful leaders have the following traits
His great leadership skills and techniques is what led him to be a great leader even years after he left the presidency position. Some of these traits and characteristics which he had and which made him the great leader he was are discussed in detail below