The Space Shuttle Challenger - Personal Statement Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
A paper "The Space Shuttle Challenger" claims that in just after 73 seconds of its launch, much-publicized project explodes is just a rib cracker. It is interesting to imagine the amusement the designers had and the shock in their faces when their idea did not live their dream…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.1% of users find it useful
The Space Shuttle Challenger
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "The Space Shuttle Challenger"

The Space Shuttle Challenger
The space ship challenger is so far the most thought provoking issue discussed in class. As much as the thought and the incidence could sound interesting, it is probably a controversial incidence to have occurred to the scientists behind the idea and the public in general. In just after 73 seconds of its launch, the much publicised project explodes, is just a rib cracker. It is interesting to imagine the amusement the designers had and the shock in their faces when their idea did not live to their dream.
However, putting aside the humorous part of it, people perished. Seven occupants died innocently in the incidence that occurred on 28th January 1986. That was tragic, putting accountability and integrity of the designers into question. The scientists, having been warned of the danger that lay in wait if they opted to carry on with the launch questions their credibility and concern for humanity. It was evident that they cared little about the safety of the crew, and their anxiety to make headlines for launching the much talked about space shuttle.
There had been early warnings of the dangers that lay ahead if the idea was carried out. The space shuttle had structural failures, with an expert raising a rather worrying alarm concern. The O-rings of the shuttle could only survive temperatures at only 40 degrees. Any temperatures below that, safety and survival of the shuttle was not guaranteed. On the morning of the launch, the temperatures were as low as 18 degrees. The expert termed the idea of launching the shuttle on such a day as absurd and ridiculous. It was bound to explode anyway. This raises a rather disturbing question, why the ignorance by the scientists? Why were they so eager to launch the shuttle?
The incidence calls for personal accountability of all parties involved in success of any project. Every party ought to play its part in the project, making sure that nothing goes wrong during the whole project. Team spirit is portrayed by this incidence, where it is the responsibility of every member in the group to play their individual roles for the success of the project. If there is no proper articulation of ideas and thoughts, if there are flaws in one section of the implementing group, the project is likely to be a total failure, just like the space shuttle incidence.
The importance of other team players exhibiting accountability and diligence in their work is a clear indication of their readiness to protect the end user of the product in question. The ignorance of the designers cost the lives of seven people, who would possibly have made an impact in the history of America. Severe punishment should have been instigated on the careless managers of the project.
From this incidence, it is clear that decision making process plays a major role in the success of a particular project. Organizational culture determines the nature of decisions the company has to undertake. Poor communication between the management of the company and the staff can result into misinformed decisions by the management.
Personally, this incidence teaches me quite a lot in relation to accountability and responsibility of my own actions. The importance of proper decision making at personal level is very essential to a person. Of much importance, the decisions taken should put into consideration the safety of other parties, both involved in the project and the general public.
Lieurance, S. (2001). The Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster in American History. Berkeley Heights, NJ: Enslow.
Vaughan, D., & History E-Book Project. (1996). The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“The Space Shuttle Challenger Personal Statement Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved de
(The Space Shuttle Challenger Personal Statement Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“The Space Shuttle Challenger Personal Statement Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Space Shuttle Challenger

Space Shuttle Challenger

...?Space Shuttle Challenger Introduction From the early twentieth century advancements in the technological arena were witnessed in the developed nations. The curiosity of study about space has increased ever since and technological advancements have been made to find out more about space. Space Shuttles have been designed from the 1960s to fulfill this goal and the space shuttle Challenger was build for this purpose only. The mission of Challenger was to explore the space in a different way and included the services of a teacher who was...
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper

The Last Flight of Space Shuttle Challenger

...?The Last Flight of Space Shuttle Challenger Order No. 829508 In his report on ‘The Last Flight of Space Shuttle Challenger’, Michael T. Charles highlights and pinpoints the reasons involved in the disaster of the Space Shuttle Challenger and investigates what was the actual cause for the disaster and those who were responsible for the massive tragedy. The Space Shuttle Challenger, Mission 51-L, took off at the Kennedy Space Center, on that fateful day, Tuesday, the 28th January, 1986, from pad 396 at approximately at...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

The Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster risk management plan

...MBA Project Management Case Study and Section # of Does it appear, from the data provided in the case that a risk management plan was in existence If such a plan did exist, then why wasn't it followed-or was it followed The Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster is one of the examples of project management. It is one of the major operations performed by National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Seven crew members were involved in this operation namely Francis R. (Dick) Scobee (Commander), Ellison S. Onizuka (mission specialist one), Judith Arlene Resnik (mission specialist two), nald Erwin Mc Nair (mission specialist three), S Christa Mc Auliff (play load...
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study

Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster

..., into actuality. And something goes wrong and how with the vision, the exhilaration of the dream - in contrast with how tragic our efforts become, we realize how fragile we are. For in itself, the dream, the challenge is made of sterner stuff. It' s as if reaching towards the dream is something that is beyond our control - for if it isn't, we would all stop telling fairly tales to children, knowing that in reality, it's not always a happy ending. The stern stuff is first -- not to be found in being rash or presumptuous, in hindsight as what the engineers of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and of Morton Thiokol, the company which produced rocket motors of space...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Space Shuttle

.... There were total four shuttles made - Columbia, Discovery, Atlantis and Challenger. The first flight was of Columbia Space Shuttle in 1981, piloted by astronauts John Young and Robert Crippen. It was the successful flight which Columbia performed and later other shuttles made several successful flights. But there was a mishap in 1986, the shuttle Challenger exploded inside the flight and the entire crew was lost. After this incident NASA suspended the shuttle program for many years, while the reasons for the disaster were investigated thoroughly and corrected. So after several years, the new improved...
15 Pages(3750 words)Essay

Organizational error that caused the failure of the space shuttle Challenger launch

...Organizational error that caused the failure of the space shuttle Challenger launch “It was not amorally calculating managers violating rules that were responsible for the tragedy. It was conformity”. (p 386) Normal organizational tendency in case of a disaster is straight forward. Fire the key decision makers, put some money into knowing what went wrong, and redefine the definitions & rules. Life goes back to normal. The same cycle then starts again, people tend to make erroneous judgment not because they are personally inclined to do so, but more often than that, organizational ethos and priorities drift their decisions in the wrong direction. With each wrongly identified decision...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Space Shuttle Challenger Accident

...Space Shuttle Challenger Accident Inserts His/Her Inserts Grade Inserts 15 April Tableof Contents I. Abstract. II. Introduction. III. Body. IV. Conclusion. V. Reference. Abstract The Space Shuttle Challenger exploded into flames last 1986. The accident unnecessarily took the lives of the seven astronauts instantly. The officers of NASA and its related agencies are to blame for the Space Shuttle Challenger Explosion. The officers did not heed warning of the whistle blowers to postpone the launch until all repairs are made. The Space...
15 Pages(3750 words)Research Paper

Discuss to what extent the role of Groupthink in the Challenger Space Shuttle was critical to the incident and suggest ways in which the situation might have been avoided

...The role of Groupthink in the Challenger Space Shuttle Disaster Introduction Decision-making is a very important process that plays a central role in the success or failure of projects in organizations. Various factors influence decision in organizations and the outcomes they bring about. Flawed decisions often lead to undesirable outcomes for an organizations while success of often attributed to right decisions. The decision-making process is critical for the quality of decisions reached and it is a process that is affected by many different factors. Various decision theories and models have been developed in order to try and explain how different decisions are reached, their outcomes,...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

The challenger space shuttle 1986

... The Challenger Space Shuttle Disaster On 28th of January 1986, shuttle orbiter, Challenger, broke up just only 73 seconds after liftoff, causing a devastating stop to the spacecraft’s tenth expedition. The disaster took the lives of all 7 astronauts aboard, as well as that of Christa McAuliffe, who was a teacher chosen to be part of the crew and teach space lessons to schoolchildren across the country (Henry, 2004). After working for several months, the Rogers Commission availed details of its results. It discovered that the Challenger tragedy was caused by a breakdown in the O-rings closing a joint on the right firm rocket booster, which permitted pressurized hot gases plus finally blaze to “blow by” the O-ring making contact... with the...
1 Pages(250 words)Research Paper

The Space Shuttle Challenger disaster

...The Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster The Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster Introduction The Space ShuttleChallenger disaster happened on January 28, 1986 when NASAs Space Shuttle Orbiter Challenger exploded 73 seconds after its launch. The accident led the deaths of all the seven crew members comprising five astronauts and two playload specialists. The spacecraft exploded over the Atlantic Ocean. Several parts of the vehicle including the crew compartment were later recovered from the floor of the ocean following a lengthy recovery operation. Given the intensity of...
8 Pages(2000 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Personal Statement on topic The Space Shuttle Challenger for FREE!

Contact Us