DISCUSSION BOARD PART 2-2 - Essay Example

Doctoral Study Rubric 7th, November, Doctoral study rubrics refer to a standard measure of evaluating proposals and doctoral study drafts as students develop them. The doctoral students use the rubrics as a guide to develop high quality proposals. In addition, the same is used to as a means of feedback. This paper evaluates three problems that might pose a problem to my project, a plan of action for demonstrating competency in each area of assessment, and the characteristics of a successful student-doctoral study chair relationship.

Doctoral study rubrics require that the research problem consist of literature from previous research that meets various requirements. These requirements include the literature must be peer reviewed, organized chronologically, recent (3-5 years old), compare and contrast different points of view among others. My study being a qualitative study, I perceive this as a challenge in that many studies are quantative in nature. In this regard, I have to go through so much literature against limited time, to compare and contrast my thinking with others.

The second challenge that can come from this research is few respondents. A qualitative research requires considerable skill and little direction. According to smith et al, qualitative research has a high dross rate because of participants digressing form the main issue (Smith et al, 2008). When collecting data in a mixed cultural set up, some individuals may be unwilling to respond or give information asked. This will result in a bias because I have to reselect the sample. A challenge may arise on meeting respondents that cannot speak the languages I speak because this prevents an open dialogue because.

A third challenge is meeting a doctoral chair from the faculty that suits my interests and learning schedule.To ensure competency in this research I have set aside time to study and do research to ensure that I can make correct contrasts and comparisons. I have researched for a good research question to propel this study, stated the research design well, and identified the method as qualitative. Already I have started working on research questions that are short, prompting, and structured. The choice of questions has taken into account three challenges earlier stated, reducing any bias in the study.

A successful student doctoral study chair relationship is critical. Building a relationship with the chair requires a student first to communicate regularly through emails, especially during the first few weeks after approval. Checking with the chair with the preferred means of communication early will spare the student form frustrations in the future. Good communication will result from understanding the best means and actually communicating through it. For instance, acknowledging receipt to emails or to assignments promptly will motivate the lecturer to work with the student.

The students need to build up knowledge about the chair through reading his responses to other doctoral students. In addition, because the student will receive various instructions from the chair, the student need to develop conceptualization of the study (Walden, N.d).ReferencesSmith, H., Chen, J., & Liu, X. (2008). “Language and rigour in qualitative research: Problems and principles in analyzing data collected in Mandarin,” BMC Medical Research Methodology. Retrieved From, http://www.biomedcentral.

com/1471-2288/8/44/Walden EDUC 8035. N.d. “Doctoral Student-Doctoral Study Chair Relationship.” Retrieved From, https://sites.google.com/site/waldeneduc8035/doctoral-companion/doctoral-student- doctoral-study-chair-relationship