Speech about company's new policy - Essay Example

Speech About Company’s New Policy It is no new truth to us that obesity has become epidemic throughout U.S. and it has plunged the nation into economic crisis as reflected through the burden of heightened medical expenditures alongside the country’s unsettled debts as well as struggles with stiff global competition and unemployment. Much as the epidemic condition bears immense drawback on American health and nutrition, it threatens to ruin our hopes of designating revenues and profits in good standing.

One sample analysis of how this can be perceived with empirical concreteness is by considering that as the demand for a job position increases and we need a workforce that ensures quality of production, then this necessarily calls for restructuring our policies concerning management of healthcare costs. In this regard, hence, we ought to contemplate and ask whether we should establish a policy of differential premiums for lifestyle-related risks to health or adopt a hands-off policy on an employee’s private behavior and charge the same amount for healthcare coverage across-the-board.

We can decide if the first option works more suitably as we examine ways by which to implement a successful premium differentials program that includes a reward system for participative workers. Then we may also deliberate on the points of advantage with respect to the second alternative if we see in our investigation that private behavior must be further addressed so that while one choice focuses on the targeted individuals to avail the premium, the hands-off policy would apply to everyone, obese and non-obese employees alike.

Eventually, as similarities and differences are drawn in this process, we can come up with a sound evaluation of which policy directs our organization’s potential to transform improper habits leading to the state of obesity. Through the policy of differential premiums, we gain the opportunity of monitoring our obese employees by making them enroll in a program that promotes cessation of drinking sodas or eating food with high content of sugar. Under this scheme, we can reasonably impose a significant periodic charge for the payment of premium provided that active participants would receive monetary incentives on exhibiting cooperation via renewed attitude and lifestyle.

This setting should encourage workers to quit or reduce former inappropriate habits to larger extent and thus, improve their performance at work once health conditions have normalized. We may opt to grant them an annual bonus amount or have them obtain a couple of bucks reward to be entered via pay check. On the other hand, imagine the feasibility of having everyone covered by the same plan and consequently make the unhealthy workers feel that hands-off policy is meant to give them the freedom to execute their preferred mode of treatment.

With this, nevertheless, they would have less engagement to the serious idea of change because the application of similar health coverage for all workers, both obese and otherwise, implies no pressure or motivation to reform old unproductive lifestyle. At this stage, we come to the point of weighing and determining which is more essential. Shall we make them realize a sense of responsibility by moderate force of the differential premium or leave them to the complacent choice of being treated like the rest?

ReferencesBrandon, Abbey. “America Cannot Afford for the Obesity Crisis to go Unnoticed any Longer.” Bipartisan Policy Center. 6 June 2012. Web. 7 Oct 2012. http://bipartisanpolicy.org/blog/2012/06/america-cannot-afford-obesity-crisis-go-unnoticed-any-longer.Alere. “Premium Differentials and Surcharges.” 2012. Web. 7 Oct 2012. http://www.alerewellbeing.com/_assets/cms_uploads/WP_Premium_Differentials_and_Surcharges_AWI.pdf.