Nobody downloaded yet

Business Law Final Case Study - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Business Law Name: Institution: Business Law Case Study The blow up of the case between Knarles’ and Ian Chetum gives rise to very many legal issues. To begin with, let us look at the issues that arise between Chetum V. Knarles. The issue at hand between the two is defamation…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.3% of users find it useful
Business Law Final Case Study
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Business Law Final Case Study"

Download file to see previous pages In addition to this view, in a case where the defamation involves a very public person and or is a matter of public concern, the plaintiff, as the complainant in the case, has to provide or give proof in the court of law that the claims or comments made by the defendant are false, and also that the defendant has either known of the truth of the claim and has simply acted recklessly and disregarded the truth out of pure malice towards the complainant or plaintiff. The statements that Knarles has made to his friends and colleagues are by all means just personal opinions, rather than facts; they are far from facts. If this is the case, then by all means, there is no case of defamation at all (Defamation. Ewell v. Boutwell, 1924). If Knarles was not simply stating his opinions about the person – the plaintiff who is Ian Chetum, then in that case his statements and comments could be considered as defamatory in nature. This is because in as much as his statements and comments could have been simple, fair comments to an issue that is of public interest and concern, Knarles had no proof of any kind that his statements were or are the truth. Therefore, as such, Knarles’ statements were made in high disregard of what is the truth, and this is utter recklessness. Consequently, Knarles can be sued for defamation by Ian Chetum. Chetum v. Stucko The next legal issue arises between Ian Chetum and Stucko. The legal issue at hand is still defamation. Just as, stated above, a case of defamation has to be backed by proof that a false statement of a fact has been made about the complainant, and have been made by a third party and caused damage to be liable in court (Defamation. Ewell v. Boutwell, 1924). The statements made by Stucko are obviously factual. If we assume that he made the statements with knowledge that he was falsifying them or blatantly disregarding the truth, then in that case he would be very liable to be charged for defamation. Nonetheless, the truth is often used as a defense for defamation claim – therefore, if the claims and statements are the truth, then Stucko has no case to answer on the grounds of defamation. The Residents v. Chetum This is the next case that the business conflict has brought up. The legal issue at hand is that of Battery. The rule of common law on Battery is that it is the intentional and or offensive act of touching of a third party without their privilege or consent to any way (Battery. Cavuoto v. Buchanan, 2004). When the building owner Ian Chetum tells the plumber from Knarles and Barkley’s company to ‘fix it’, – when referring to the broken boiler, and at the same time knowing that the broken boiler is highly defective, and the manufacturer had recalled their product, Ian Chetum, as the owner of the building is intentionally engaging in a harmful ‘touching’ of all of the residents of his building ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Business Law Final Case Study Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Business Law Final Case Study Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/business/1443627-business-law-final-case-study
(Business Law Final Case Study Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
Business Law Final Case Study Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words. https://studentshare.org/business/1443627-business-law-final-case-study.
“Business Law Final Case Study Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/business/1443627-business-law-final-case-study.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Business Law Final Case Study

Business law

...? Business Law Monsanto Company is a multinational agricultural biotechnology corporation and it is oneof the world’s biggest companies with regard to revenue. The following paper would include a brief account of the history of the company, the products by the company and the position of the company in the global market. Along with the profile of the company all the ethical issues related to the company’s operations and the criticism raised against such issues would be analyzed as well. The company has been subject to ethical implications like; environmental pollution, bribery and false advertisement of its products. The company has been in the midst of legal issues for multiple times and there has been...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

Business law

...?Business Law Table of Contents Question 4 (a)Provide a short account of the commercial background of the case, and key aspects/clauses of the standardized contract in dispute between the parties. 4 (b)Regarding the pivotal clause 7.4, what case law principles governed its ‘proper construction’, in the view of the judges (Jacobson, Lander & Foster JJ) on appeal? 5 (c)What was the nature of the term which the primary judge, Jagot J. had implied into the contract, and on what grounds and case law did the judges on appeal decide that such implied term (of fact) wasn’t required to give ‘business efficacy’ to the contract? 6 (d)Was the appeal decision ‘fair...
14 Pages(3500 words)Case Study

Business law

...?Research Paper On The applicability of common law and equity to contract and tort of Negligence Business Law Case study: Steggles Limited v Yarrabee Chicken Company Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 91 Date: April 2013 Professor: Question 1 Short account of the case (a) This case involved a standard “Broiler Chicken Growing Contract” executed between the said parties. The respondents (growers) role was to rear chicken based in “Hunter Valley Region.” These chicks were supplied to them by the appellants (Steggles) whose processing plant was at Beresfield. When chicks had grown, they were picked and paid for by appellants. The respondents was one of the growers who filed a representative suit claiming...
14 Pages(3500 words)Case Study

Business Law

...U.S.C., sec. 2). On the other hand, the Clayton Antitrust Act, another antitrust law of the United States of America, prohibits "exclusive dealings", "mergers or acquisition" if these acts substantially lessen competition (15 U.S.C., secs. 14 and 18). The US antitrust law refers to the body of laws that make illegal or unlawful certain business practices deemed to hurt businesses or consumers, or both, or violate business ethics. These include anti-competitive behaviors such as monopoly, restraint of trade and commerce, and unfair business practices like exclusive dealings, mergers, and acquisition and other practices...
5 Pages(1250 words)Case Study

Business Law - land law

...from another person's Last Will and Testament. Yet another common example is where two or more persons have received separate deeds to the same parcel of real estate." Black's Law (2006). With all things considered, Bill Bob would need to clarify questions that would assist legal counsel in determining whether or not he has a solid case. The questions he needs to answer are as follows: First, is he related to any of the previous owner's, if so, what is his relation to them Hill Bob could have rights to the land through a death decree due to his relation to the previous owners. "Unknown to the owner, a third person - a "squatter" - may be in illegal and unauthorized occupation of a far corner of the land parcel. If...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study

Business law

...he is performing a business transaction but also while entering and leaving the premises. This case comes under the purview of Occupier’s Liability Act 1957. Occupiers Liability Act 1957 The Occupiers Liability Act 1957 regulates occupiers liability to visitors or customers who pay visit to their premises. S 1(2) of the Act defines ‘visitors’ as persons who enter the premises with the permission by the occupier. The Learned Wig is a shop where visitors are invited to do a business transaction. As per the law, visitors are those persons who have the express or implied permission of the occupier to be on the premises to carry out a transaction. Therefore, Henry was a visitor to the...
5 Pages(1250 words)Case Study

Business Law

...Norbert Eelbode v. Grothe and Chec ISSUE background facts When Norbert Eelbode applied for a job with Travelers Inn in the of Washington, the company sent him to Laura Grothe, a physical therapist at Chec Medical Centers, Inc., for a preemployment physical exam, as part of the application process, Before the exam started, Eelbode was obliged to sign a document that stated in part, "I hereby release Chec and the Washington Readicare Medical Group and its physicians from all liability arising from any injury to me resulting from my participation in the exam.”, this document actually releasing from anu liability the doctors and the medical group. During the exam, Grothe asked Eelbode to do an exercise and during it Eelbode... Eelbode v. Grothe...
1 Pages(250 words)Case Study

Business law

...of the company for selling liquor to minors. The law governing the aforesaid legal issues is Title-23 Chapter- 6 of the Idaho Code. According to Idaho Code § 23-604, any person under 21 years of age who shall purchase, attempt to purchase or possess any alcohol beverages, beer or wine shall be guilty of misdemeanor and punished according to the schedule set out in § 18-1502. Moreover, no person licensed in pursuance to title 23 Idaho code shall sell any alcohol beverage to a person under 21 years of age and shall be guilty of misdemeanor in case of its violation. In case of misrepresentation made by purchaser, the purchaser shall also be liable with the licensee (Idaho Code § 23-615). It was held in State vs. Kolliche,...
1 Pages(250 words)Case Study

Business law

...against Buchanan County & Davis. Rule: In the case, Buchanan County & Davis (Appellees) violated laws that disallow negligent hiring and retention under Iowa State Laws (Center 541). Argument: Under the laws on negligent hiring and retention applicable in Iowa State, Buchanan County & Davis, were liable for wrongful conduct by facilitating Bazt’s tortious actions through failure to act on several recommendations and complaints. Conclusion: The case involved claims of negligent supervision and retention against Buchanan County & Davis. PC 8, SS, Grandchamp (1947). Facts: Ammonium Nitrate is a strong oxidizing agent that can facilitate massive...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study

Business Law

...Program: 24 October Business law Case Brief Case and Citation Englert v. Nutritional Sciences Court of Appeal of Ohio, 2008 Ohio-5062 Facts The case is an appeal from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas. Englert was the plaintiff in the original case and appellant in the appeal case while Nutritional Science, with Zeune, are the appellees, previously defendants. Nutritional Sciences produced and dealt in nutritional supplement and ran a promotion in which Englert entered. A panel selected winners in different categories, over a period and one of the promotion’s regulations was that winners had to agree specific regulations before claiming their prices. A provision, put under asterisk, stated that...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Business Law Final Case Study for FREE!

Contact Us