Both parties need one another. Imperial needs Acmes business as it is a large portion of its revenue. Acme needs Imperial as “loss of Imperial as a supplier would be devastating.” Litigation is costly and it would prove very harmful to the…
Download file to see previous pages...
Imperial could find itself with a sudden, severe decrease in its cash flow. It might also have to layoff employees and have equipment sit idle. Simply put, litigation, regardless of the outcome could do irreparable damage to both parties.
In this case negotiation would be the appropriate form of alternative dispute resolution to pursue. The two parties need to sit down face-to-face. They need to lay out there understanding of the ambiguous clause in the contract, seek common ground, and perhaps by consent share any costs or losses involved in their differing interpretations of the clause. If negotiation proves fruitless they should move to mediation. Then an objective and disinterested third party could assist them in understanding one anothers position and finding a middle ground. (Marsh, 2008)
Due to the complexity of the case collaborative law would be the best approach. The case, too complex for a jury, might also be too complex for a mediator or arbitrator, regardless of their qualifications and experience. Therefore, the parties would be wise to sit down together, with their lawyers accompanying them, and work towards an agreement in camera with trained lawyers, able to understand the complexity of the case. If they were to negotiate in good faith, in this private environment with expert legal advice they stand the best chance of resolving the dispute in a fair manner that also takes account of the legal complexities of the situation. Collaborative law would also ensure that the case never ended up in court.
Collaborative law is “cost effective and discrete”, and with trade secrets involved that is precisely what each party needs. (Newitt, “Shot before dawn”) It is an unusual proposal for a business dispute, but most appropriate in this instance.
In this case it is plain that Empire Corporation wishes to avoid a court case There is the danger of disadvantageous precedent being set if the case does go to trial. Also, the company may find
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Principles: A notice refers to a legal concept that is intended at making a part to be aware of the legal process that have effects on their rights, duties and obligations. Some are usually placed in public places whereby they are used to guide or warn the public about what they should or should not do.
The concept of separate legal entity refers to existence of a company and the right that it acquires to sue and be sued in its own name, hold its own property and be liable for any debts accrued (Rose et al 2009). The important phenomenon in respect of separate legal entity is the concept of limited liability that is the liability of shareholders being limited to the extent of unpaid shares.
The main issue that comes into effect in this case is that, within a period of three months after signing the contract, X undergoes a physical injury, which renders him unable to use the health facility for a period of 6 months.
Further, X's brother is not able to make use of the health club facility since he has relocated to Phoenix, Arizona which is a place more than 25 miles from the present vicinity of the health club, and moreover, he cannot make use of his present membership in Silver's Gym in that place.
B says yes. At that point, the sale between A and B has been perfected because the parties by then have intended or agreed to have the goods transferred to the buyer.4 B becomes the owner of the Austin car and he is now under obligation to pay to A the ten thousand pounds, the amount of the cause or consideration or the selling price of the chattel.
A novation ordinarily arises when a new individual assumes an obligation to pay what was incurred by the original party to the contract and the original debtor is totally released from the obligation, which is transferred to someone else (Law Encyclopedia).
The laws have undergone shifts many times, perhaps owing to the fact that international commerce has itself undergone so many developments. Indeed, "each statement of a rule of law is a generalization drawn from this seething, pulsating background of life." (Corbin 1937, p449)
enforceable contract; namely offer, acceptance and consideration (it is important to note that parties entering into a contract must also have legal capacity to do so and it is presumed from the facts given that capacity is not an issue in this case). Lord Wilberforce asserted the rule for formation of contract in New Zealand Shipping Co Limited v A M Satterthwaite, The Eurymedon1:
v. Wash., 326 U.S. 310, 316 (U.S. 1945), the Supreme Court held that in order to subject a defendant to an out of state judgment, the defendant has to have sufficiently substantial contacts with the plaintiff. In the case of Adamson, it is evident that the
As an independent contractor, as he proposed in his new work preference, Chip began to operate as a single entity in mere form of partnership with the Axel Company. ESA stipulates that an independent contractor like the case
Mrs. Palsgraf, the plaintiff, was at a rail station, and while she was on the platform, a man who was carrying a package ran to board a departing plane on another side of the platform. The man lost balance and two guards who were near him attempted
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Case Study on topic Business law case for FREE!