Creative intelligence - Essay Example

?Running Head: Creative Intelligence Creative Intelligence [Institute’s Creative Intelligence The four styles of creative intelligence are intuitive, innovative, imaginative, and inspirational. Intuitive individuals make their decisions because of outcomes and entirely depend on what happened in history to make decisions about present or future. An organization’s leaders can invigorate their dormant company by using this method of intelligence. This style can take an organization to the soaring heights of success by bringing creativity and identifying potentials of different individuals (Proctor, 2010). It accentuates accomplishment, struggle, results, rationalism, past experience, and present mindedness. Experiences play important role in intuitive style because individuals make decisions by comparing the present situation with a past one. This style is commonly preferable for managers and politicians (Lewis, 1995). Innovative style focuses on questioning the traditional customs, they believe in determination, and experimentation. They make complete analysis of the data and they prefer willingness to work rather than hard work. Mostly people who like to experiment and believe anything to be true after experimenting possess this style of intelligence such as engineers and scientists. Mostly, peoples’ virtues are persistence in the face of complications and people can find these virtues in their method of handling any complex situation with ease. Though work place plays a huge role in deciding how people perform but people with innovative style somehow convert their discomfort into opportunities and still manage to make out the best from them (Rowe, 2007). These kinds of people can contribute largely in the success of any organization because they possess the talent of molding the situation in their own favor however, they lack experience like intuitive ones. Combination of intuitive and innovative people can brighten the name of any organization. People possessing third style that is imaginative are able to envisage and make out opportunities, they are artistic, open-minded, and they are not afraid of taking risks and always think in a unique manner. This style describes astuteness and it belongs particularly to musicians, leaders, artists, writers and the ones who make their imagination and creativity their professions. These kinds of people are very elementary for an organization as they like to take risks and organizations mostly lack these kinds of people. They give huge importance to their creativity and always make decision creatively rather than unexcitingly (Proctor, 2010). The last style is inspirational intelligence, which has influences of change in community. They are willing to accept change and bring change, which is for the good of others. This style is mainly for individuals who have some visions and missions in their minds such as teachers, leaders, and writers. If one compares four styles one finds that the intuitive people have insight in solving functional problems, Innovative individuals mostly take a long time to reach to a solution of problem because they analyze every aspect. Imaginative individuals use value judgments to make their decisions and the inspirational ones totally take into account the welfare of other people to make the decisions. When an organization has to make a decision urgently then it should approach intuitive individuals, however, when they have to identify the effects of certain problems in long term, they should contact imaginative individuals. Although each of these styles describes a definite creative intelligence style, a mainstream of people have more than one creative intelligence style (Rowe, 2007). The level of strength for each style results in a conduct for each individual. This approach to creativity expands the possible number of creative intelligence styles. No one denies that it is beneficial to have more than one creative intelligence style because it would help to treat different types of problems at different times. Along with these creative intelligent styles, five forces affect mental models and mindsets. These forces are “education, training, influence on others, rewards and incentives, and personal experience” (Rowe, 2007). Education is a primary thing in any individual’s life because it changes an individual’s perception about this world. Education polishes an individual’s skills and makes him what he becomes in this world. Education to some extent also makes boundaries in learning because it limits the content of learning but its paucities are not more than its advantages. Training is a precise knowledge pertinent to education in which people discover how to deal with transformations and handle complex tasks. These tasks mostly associate with individuals’ own jobs. A singer would know about the pitches and voice-associated matters however, a fashion stylist would have more knowledge about the clothing and colors depending on their precise training. This training is more detailed and noticeable than education and one can easily transform this training (Rowe, 2007). Influence of others is another important force. Societies have great influences of families, friends, books, and relatives. Many individuals’ approach to solving the problems depends on how these individuals perceive different roles in their lives. For example, a child who continuously reads about Newton may become a scientist when he grows up. Society also have great influences of what it watches on television such as after watching reality shows and dancing and singing competition children get so much inspired and start doing what they watch. Children also have great influences of stunts and styles of actors and want to become like them (Proctor, 2010). Rewards and incentives also play significant roles in shaping the mental models and mindsets of individuals. These rewards are both monetary on non-monetary, monetary are direct financial rewards and non-monetary are in terms of appreciation and encouragement by society. These rewards give them motivation towards their work; sometimes motivation towards one aspect might prove to be de-motivation towards other. For example, at times children on getting huge appreciation for sports divert their attention from studies, therefore societies should give equal importance to both and give appreciation even on small achievements in education so that children do not lose their track (Hughes, 2009). Personal Experience is different for everyone; a way one has lived his life, the hardships one has come across in the life, and the leanings that came out of these hardships. Personal experience has its reflection in every step of life whether it is education or it is career because it is what one faces throughout the life. I mostly use my past experience to make decisions about present and future as I already have ideas of what happened in past, what were the reasons behind the happening, what could have been done to prevent this from occurring. Moreover, my training also helps me in what my job asks from me. Whatever I have learnt during my precise training I implement in my job in this way I deal with complex tasks and hardships at my work place and contribute in the success of organization. References Hughes. (2009). Leadership 6E (Sie). Tata McGraw-Hill Education. Lewis, D. S. (1995). Organizational Change: Relationship between Reactions, Behaviour and Organizational Performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management , 41-55. Proctor, T. (2010). Creative Problem Solving for Managers: Developing Skills for Decision Making and Innovation. Taylor & Francis. Rowe. (2007). Creative Intelligence. Pearson Education India. Read More