This article is about zero tolerance policies in the work place. Zero tolerance policies refer to strategies that allow for meager compromise on consequences of certain work place mistakes (Punch, 2007). This may relate to scenarios such as violence, harassment…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Download file to see previous pages
In Simon’s case, he had participated in contravening a company’s internet policy (Gerson, Parker, Volokh, Halloran, Cherkasky, 2006). Simon had utilized the company’s intranet to communicate with an unauthorized personality out of the network. The violation was gross since the company had sculptured clear conditions about the policy. This included clear indication of the relevant consequences. The management had notable controls in the same situation. To begin with, it laid a clear policy. This policy indicated that it banned use of the company’s internet and intranet in communication under unstated uses. The company also stated that unwarranted internet use and e-mailing could result into the termination of employment. In addition, the company employed strategic measures of terminating Simon’s tenure. The management made an indirect approach of firing Simon. This would be followed by an explanation of the act that led to the tenure termination. There are controlling and coordination skills that are necessary in this situation. To begin with, it is vital that the company harnesses a proper communication channel. This is a system whereby each employee has adequate information about the company’s policies. In this perspective, the company can invest in an automatic e-mail system that updates on company’s policies and the consequences of breaching the provisions. Besides, meetings, between the management and employees, should be regular for physical information and discussion. In certain instances, zero tolerance policies might be stringent. In this sense, discussion can modify the policies to suit multiple scenarios. It is crucial that employees design and agree to zero tolerance policies. This would absolve the management from blame in cases of grim consequences to employees. The solution that the company employed had particular details. The management strove to strike a vital point in terminating Simon’s tenure. Companies would usually employ sane and rational employees. This means that it could apply formal means of communicating with an affected employee (Brooks & Dunn, 2009). Such communication would take the letter or e-mail method for information. Simon could not have possessed the option of not leaving the company. The use of guards was an informal sense of terminating Simon’s employment. It is devoid of modern managements skills since it seeks to be autocratic oriented. This is because the guards could have employed forceful means in case of resistance by Simon. Element of force is evident from the communication between the security officers and the management. The management was monitoring Simon’s reaction for an additional strategy. However, the company had a proper strategy of informing Simon. To begin with, this demonstrates of zero tolerance on certain violations. It also highlights that the other employees should educate themselves of company’s policies. However, the company can utilize other strategies. This pertains to drawing the same sense on a company’s reputation. The vital element in zero tolerance policies should regard their intentions. Zero tolerance policies should seek to highlight the sense of certain behavior. This is different from the focus of merely humiliating employees. Policies should concentrate on processes rather than the consequences of the same. In this view, the company could have employed an alternative strategy of terminating Simon’s benefits. Termination of benefits could achieve the orientation of the breach. In case of an internet’s condition, Simon could have been barred from the connection. Besides, the company could lock Simon from accessing certain information. Additionally,
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Zero Tolerance Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Zero Tolerance Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/business/1401167-zero-tolerance
(Zero Tolerance Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
Zero Tolerance Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words. https://studentshare.org/business/1401167-zero-tolerance.
“Zero Tolerance Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/business/1401167-zero-tolerance.
The author states that Zero tolerance policy eliminating students who involve themselves in deviant behaviors will prohibit others from becoming disruptive. This will eventually create an improved and peaceful learning environment for the remaining students. These policies are widely spread among the schools in America.
Others feel threatened by an overwhelming threat of violence in their institutions. Certain schools use zero tolerance because it is supported by the authorities. A literature review on the policy is imperative in determining whether these justifications are well-founded.
This principle, in effect, reverses the burden of proof. The presumption of innocence is replaced by a presumption of guilt.
In contrast, Innes (2003) argues that reassurance or neighbourhood policing should be a key component of a 'total policing' philosophy which recognizes that neighbourhood safety is both objective (local crime rates are falling) and subjective
emotional and psychological. In this study we are trying to find out the extent of the problem and to see if the policy of zero tolerance will be effective in reducing bullying incidents that are taking place. The data has been gathered from a multi-cultural society to ensure that the results are not biased and represent the whole society not just a sub-sector.
To achieve this, the department of Zero Tolerance Policing should be made independent so that it may be free from any external interference by "the invisible hand". In the United Kingdom, this policy has been widened to even cover the internet misuse and sexual harassment that were initially not covered.
These policies may address issues such as sexual harassment, workplace violence, stealing, racial comments or observations, lethargic approaches to work and other activities which may harm the company or any of its employee's interests.
Anybody disobeying the policies implemented is usually suspended or fired due to the nature of these policies.
This essay analyzes that zero tolerance can be a source of crime where the victims will suffer stigmatization and humiliation for decisions passed which may be harsh even for minor crimes. Instead of rehabilitating the offenders, they will feel degraded and view themselves as criminals which will not stop their habits but rather increase the cases of crime.
Cases of knife stabbing, mass shootouts, as well as, physical bullying continue to be significantly challenging issues, especially in public schools. It is irrefutable that, even a single case of student noncompliance poses a significant