This paper will discuss the design school of strategy and the position school of strategy in detail. There will be an explaination of ten schools of strategy. Comparisons will also be made between the design school of strategy and position school of strategy. …
Download file to see previous pages...
Also this school makes chief executive officer as the main formulator of the strategy. The planning school of strategy identifies strategy making as a formal process. It calls for a mechanical and systematic process of strategy formulation with no or little creativity. The cognitive school sees strategy making as a mental process and takes input from different concepts of psychology. This school is largely conceptual in nature. The learning school stresses on learning from past experience and therefore sees strategy making as an emergent process. The power school of strategy argues that negotiating between different power holders within the organization is an important part of strategy formulation. The environmental school sees strategy making as a reactive process that is dependent on the external environment. The cultural school of strategy calls for group work in formulation of strategy. The configuration school of strategy sees strategy making as a process of transformation. The different schools of strategy can be grouped into three larger groups (Mintzberg, Ahlstrand, & Lampel, 2002). First group is prescriptive in nature and consist of design, planning, and positioning school. This group tells how a strategy should ideally be made. Second group tells how the strategy is made and compromises of entrepreneurial, cognitive, learning, power, cultural, and environmental schools. The last group consists of the configuration school that is both prescriptive and descriptive in nature. Design School of Strategy The design school of strategy argues in favor of consciously controlled thought when it comes to strategy making in order to establish a fit between external opportunities and internal competence (Mintzberg, 2006)....
This paper stresses that the position school also puts the job of strategy formulation in the hands of expert. Both the schools do not talk about team work and sharing of information when it comes to development of strategy. Centralized approach in strategy making was the mindset for a long time in management. Knowledge sharing was not considered vital until modern modes of communication were developed. This is why both the positioning school and design school view strategy making coming from a centralized source. Design school assumes that environment is stable and predictable, and there is no uncertainty while the positioning school accepts that market place might change due to competitors and change in demand. But both the schools focus on the economic environment.
This report makes a conclusion that the design school and the positioning school are two of the schools of strategy presented in the book. The design school became popular in later part of 1950s and focuses on creative strategy formulation by the leader with the aim of creating a fit between the outside environment and the competence of the firm. The positioning school was founded by Michael Porter and it focuses on strategy formulation as an analytical process. This school argues that finding the right industry for the firm is essential and offer model for choosing an industry. Then this school suggests that firm positions itself in the industry and then chooses a strategy relative to the position of the firm.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Schools of Strategy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/business/1394740-schools-of-strategy
(Schools of Strategy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3250 Words)
“Schools of Strategy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/business/1394740-schools-of-strategy.
This theoretical paper presents a theoretical analysis, contrasts and synthesis of two schools of strategy. The analysis and evaluation of the two schools of strategy will be based on: How risk un-certainty will be carried out, effective resource allocation, market structure and dynamic changes in business environment.
(1998), he theorised nine different schools in strategic thinking that are categorised into two broad schools: the prescriptive and descriptive. In this essay, the student aims to illumine the similarities and differences of the said schools of strategy, and offer insights and perspectives through an exposition of actual examples, alongside pertinent business literatures.
It is based on the methods of planning that dominate most of the textbooks on strategic management and related disciplines. The second point of view is the evolutionary approach, which is inspired by the concept of biological evolution, particularly its fatalistic metaphor.
The information being researched can also happen to be touching on other aspects, such as social, interpersonal, cultural, or even political contexts. Strategy content research is a data analysis and research method which is found to be extremely viable in the conduction of research touching on a large number of fields and topics.
SEMCO Company Strategy Introduction SEMCO is a company that is a typical example of other companies that have expressed confidence in their growth. It is evidently seen in their performance as they have climbed the ladder to greater heights. However, these are organisations that have opposed the norm of using traditional strategic management concepts.
According to the paper eco-schools as described by the Eco-schools website as “one of five environmental education programmes run internationally by the Foundation for Environmental Education. This programme is free and thereby helps to ensure that sustainable issues are easily managed – in the nurseries, primary schools, secondary schools, or special education schools.