More Useful Comments - Book Report/Review Example

More Useful Comments The abstract summarized key sections of the study. It began by stating the thesis statement that Faustic surveys are labour intensive, time consuming and costly, quite fantastic. The section included all other key sections apart from the results and the conclusion which explains the summary and the position of the researcher. The title is very wonderful making it easier to grasp the purpose of the study. The abstract grabs a lot of attention and drives the readers urge to understand the paper. The study ought to have included some of the key terms to ease compression. The area considered for the study is very convincing given its size that provides a diverse nature of the ecosystem. It is a perfect ground to analyze time and cost issues which are associated with sampling. Despite its large area, the peculiarity and the presence of variety of species gives the researcher a perfect opportunity for the analysis. The area also suits the study because the researcher is likely to incur challenges as they cannot literally count the population to be subjected to the in-depth analysis. This explanation and analysis is super and makes it easy to appreciate the work. You did not mention some of the reasons behind the study. The author failed to extensively present the research problem. It may be tricky for the reader to appreciate what is being described in the paper. You need to remember that the most important part of a study is the problem statement. The question that a reader will ask includes; what is the purpose of the study? What is the problem? Why should it be solved? What solutions do you offer? Are there other studies on this? The questions on sustainability, reliability and validity must also be considered. These sections are missing and the reader might not find a reason to comprehend the views in the paper. Can you also present any argument that opposes the statement that you are presenting? What are they saying? And why are they opposing your points? It is only through these concepts that we get to understand and deduce a conclusion. There is no reasonable results and conclusion if there is no basis for the study. The paper should include views of those who oppose the sentiments in this paper and give a reason why your paper opposes their sentiments. Your paper does not state the research objectives and aims of the study. Please remember that objectives and aims are fundamental in any study. They are the guiding principles in the analysis. What will be your basis for the discussion if the hypothesis is not included? Remember that a study should have both null and alternative hypothesis which can either be accepted or rejected to deduce a conclusion. It is therefore hard to understand what the researcher will be comparing to the existing literature review. You however explain the sample design stating a sample size of 10 which is quite adequate. This is good as it reduces any possibility of biasness. The biggest problem in this paper is that there is no current literature on what you are discussing. You must remember that studies do not float on oceans. There are previous fundamental principles and theories that exist and your study must be anchored on these arguments. You should be refuting, approving or improving on the existing study. You must be able to compare what had been done by other scholars. It is only through this that your study might be presented before reasonable scholars and be understood. This is one critical part that you must never forget to include in your study. Remember that a detailed reference of the same should also be added to enable the reader compare the studies in terms of the problem and the methodology adopted. The discussion on the sites took better part of the paragraphs which were quite irrelevant. The set up of the same did little in terms of grasping the content. It takes better part of the paper and has a lot of technical sections and wordings. Most of these technical terms are unfortunately not included in the paper. You must remember that the paper should be in such a way that can be understood by all. If there are technical terms remember to provide a section in the appendix that explains the same. Having a lot of irrelevant information also diverts the attention of the reader making the study to be completely off the thesis statement. You also fail to explain the issues of ethical consideration and how they are dealt with in the study. It does not cover methods that will be used in measuring of the results. The reader therefore does not know the method adopted. They cannot analyze their appropriateness and relevance to the study. The paper does well by clearly explaining and presenting how mammals and frogs were captured and where they were captured. You have also presented relevant tables and graphs that are helpful in the appendix section in the analysis of the data. The results are helpful in understand the aim of the study and the research thesis. Just improve on the graph, some parts are quite confusing. You detailed some of the key findings of the study. The paper stated that the trapping efforts majorly followed the preceding sessions which recorded some of the captured species. The paper states that only the species that were in the trapping sessions early were more widespread and common. Therefore, it required lesser effort to capture, however the cryptic species generally required a longer time and greater effort to detect; an extended time period of three days only results to the capturing of a trappable species. The paper states that if the study is to inventory a percentage of a small mammal, frog or reptile population, the chances that the results will be the same is high. Both intrinsic and extrinsic factors should be taken into consideration to enhance the understanding of the study. The presentation of methodology is very detailed and matches the research thesis. The methodology is clearly defined making it easier to connect the study and the literature review. You clearly described the participants and the steps that are adopted in the sampling process. The method of sampling that is applied is appropriate and ensures that the entire population is covered. The paper goes further to detail the instruments that are applied and steps applied in the collection of data which matches the study. Less useful comment The critical analysis is very succinct and makes it easy to understand the concept that is being explained. The detailed understanding of the issues being discussed is quite interesting. The author through the explanations adopts a number of descriptive writing skills that make the work quite interesting. Good work. The paper was easy to read and grasp apart from the discussion section. There was a lot of information that could easily confuse the reader and subsequently failing to grasp some of the key concepts. Generally, the arrangement of the paper misses some key points. There are few mistakes in the paper with regards to sentence arrangement and structure. There are a number of long sentences, some of which are not easy to comprehend. There were some technical concepts that could not be easily understood without a proper understanding of the subject. The main suggestion in the paper is that you need to include the literature review section which is very important in any study. Also remember to include objectives, purpose, aim and hypothesis which are also fundamental in any research paper. Consider checking a number of sentence structures. Some of them are quite long and confusing. Reference Assessing sampling effort as part of ongoing surveys of small-medium terrestrial vertebrates, fish and marine invertebrates in mesic south west Australia. Read More