Unit 1 Assignment: Research - Essay Example

Comparison between ADAAG Standards and UD Principles ADAAG standards UD Principles Interior Floor Surfaces Floor surfaces shall be stable, firm, slip resistant and glare-free.Tolerance for Error: The design minimizes hazards and the adverse consequences of accidental or unintended actions.Interior Floor SurfacesFloor surfaces shall not be heavily patterned.Carpet shall be low profile or low loop construction, directly glued to the subfloor.Equitable UseThe design is useful and marketable to people with diverse abilities.

Interior DoorsUnless equipped with a power door operator, doors shall have level wheelchair maneuvering spaceon both sides of the door, and clear spacebeside the latch, as described in Table 4.1.6.Flexibility in UseThe design accommodates a wide range of individual preferences and abilities.Storage, Shelving and Display UnitsA clear space at least 760 mm (30 in.) by 1370 mm (54 in.) complying with Section 1.1.1 Space and Reach Requirements that allows either forward or parallel approach by a person using a wheelchair shall be provided at accessible storage facilities.

Size and Space for Approach and UseAppropriate size and space is provided for approach, reach, manipulation, and use regardless of users body size, posture, or mobility.Similarities of two ADAAG standards and UD Principles, and how they achieve the same goal for all user populations The first ADAAG standard matches with the first UD Principle because having stable floor surfaces that are firm, glare-free and slip resistant would automatically minimize possible hazards and accidents to the users of the buildings.

Similarly, ADAAG standard number 3 matches with UD Principle because installing maneuvering spaceon on both sides of the doors increases flexibility of the users whether disabled or not. This confirms that there is an overlap between ADA and Universal Design building requirements (Sanford 45).Reasons why ADAAG standards and UD Principles are different The interior design standards stipulated under the ADA and UD are different in the sense that ADA standards state the minimum requirements buildings should meet in order to eliminate discrimination against persons with disabilities.

Universal Design principles on the other hand aim at meeting the best practices for design that are being introduced and improving the current practices in order to meet different peoples needs. Moreover, it appears like ADA standards emphasis solely on disabled people’s civil rights, while Universal Design considers every single user of the buildings (Sanford 48). Universal Design standards apply to all types of buildings while ADA standards may not apply to single family residences.Relevance of Universal Design principles to a design project already adhering to the prescriptive code provisions regulating interior design Universal Design principles have no relevance to projects that are designed while adhering to the prescriptive code provisions regulating interior design because standards regulating interior design are more detailed and inclusive of all Universal Design principles.

Provisions regulating interior design are prepared by professionals (architects and interior designers) who are conversant with Universal Design principles, hence integrate them accordingly. However, it might be necessary to double check just for incase errors of omission occurred during the preparation of interior design codes (Kalin and Harold 56). Works CitedTop of FormBottom of FormTop of FormTop of FormKalin, Mark, and Harold Rosen. Construction Specifications Writing: Principles and Procedures.

Hoboken, N.J: John Wiley & Sons, 2010. Internet resource. Bottom of FormTop of FormSanford, Jon. Universal Design As a Rehabilitation Strategy: Design for the Ages. New York: Springer Pub, 2012. Print.